KJV Preservation: It’s no pleasure to differ so widely from many whom are esteemed in the way of Christ, and whose ability and general knowledge far exceeds our own; but to use the words of another, “the Word of God is the greatest, most necessary, and most important thing in Christendom,” and we might add in all of the world, as there is nothing more essential, the neglect of which is to forsake our “own mercy,” Jonah 2:8, and to shut our ears to the only voice that speaks from heaven. Hebrews 1:1-2. For believers, there is nothing more precious as it is the ‘looking’ glass to behold “the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” II Corinthians 4:6. Every glimpse of divine glory, all comfort in affliction, every beam of hope that penetrates the thoughts and settles the mind in “that blessed hope,” Titus 2:13, comes to us through the word of the Lord. It is the sacred lantern by which we behold Christ, the bread by which we are nourished, and the rock upon which we stand. Ephesians 2:20. All truth emanates from its pages, as it governs our lives, formulates our thoughts, and determines the course for all our decisions. It is the only light in a world of darkness, without which man is blind to God’s truth, deaf to His voice, and lost in his own reason. All else will fail! Religion will crumble, nations shall fall, and we all will fade away as a leaf, Isaiah 64:6, “but the word of the Lord endureth for ever, and this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.” I Peter 1:25. There is nothing more needful, nothing more glorious, nothing more divine!
Inspiration without preservation would leave us with no certainty, for what good is a Word once given if it cannot be found today? In every age, God’s people have clung to the Word as their most precious treasure, whether Israel receiving the law at Sinai, David delighting in the Psalms, or the apostles preaching Christ from the Scriptures. It is in this same spirit that we approach the Authorized Version, not as a mere artifact of history, but as a vessel by which the everlasting Word of God has been preserved, proclaimed, and cherished. Paul thanks “God without ceasing,” that when the Thessalonians received the word of God they “received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.” I Thessalonians 2:13. And if the Word is in truth from God, then it deserves the same reverence as the divine Source from which it flows.
The God who breathed out every word of Scripture has also kept every word intact. Our Lord declared, “it is written, that man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.” Luke 4:4. He was quoting from Deuteronomy 8:3, where the same truth was first recorded. But this raises an unavoidable question, how can we live by every word unless every word has been preserved? If even one part has been lost, then the command becomes impossible. Christ did not say we live by most of God’s words, or by whatever fragments might survive the ages, but by every word.
Such a claim leaves no room for uncertainty; it demands assurance that every word remains intact, and it is here that the Spirit of truth, John 16:13, bears witness with divine authority, persuading believers to receive the Bible as Christ Himself received it in His earthly ministry. Our Lord never spoke as the skeptics of modern criticism. He affirmed Moses as the author of the Law, Mark 12:26, David as the sweet psalmist, Luke 20:42, and Daniel as the prophet Matthew 24:15; to Him, these writings were not fragments of uncertain origin, but together they formed one Divine Book, the Scriptures. Christ testified that they were given by the Holy Spirit, Mark 12:36, that not one word could be broken, John 10:35, not one jot or tittle could pass away, Matthew 5:18, and that every line carried God’s authority. Matthew 4:4,7,10. If this was the testimony of Christ concerning the Scriptures, can we believe any less? Christ’s view of Scripture must be ours. He affirmed Moses, David, and Daniel as true authors; He spoke of the writings collectively as the Scriptures; He declared them Spirit-given, unbreakable, and imperishable. To deny the preservation and authority of Scripture is not merely to disagree with men, but to set ourselves against the very testimony of Christ. And if Christ Himself bore witness to the Scriptures as inspired and enduring, then it follows that any view which separates inspiration from preservation leaves us with a hollow confession.
What profit is there in speaking of inspiration if preservation is denied? What comfort is it to say there once was an inspired Bible, if no such Bible exists today? Inspiration severed from preservation is like a candle without a flame, or a sword without an edge. The very purpose of God breathing out His Word is undone, unless He also supernaturally keeps that Word for every generation. If Scripture exists only in the originals, then Scripture no longer exists at all. Scripture, in the Bible’s own usage, is not confined to the originals but applies equally to copies and translations. When the Ethiopian eunuch sat in his chariot reading from the prophet Isaiah, Acts 8, he did not hold the original scroll penned by Isaiah’s hand, yet the Spirit calls what he read “Scripture.” The noble Bereans “searched the Scriptures daily,” Acts 17:11, but they did not possess autographs from Moses or the prophets, only copies, and yet these are honored with the name “Scripture.” Our Lord Himself, when He entered the synagogue at Nazareth, read aloud from the book of Isaiah, Luke 4:16-21; and it was no original autograph, but a synagogue copy, and yet Christ declared, “this day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears.” Likewise Timothy, from his earliest childhood, was acquainted with the “holy scriptures,” II Timothy 3:15, not fragile originals locked away in some museum, but copies preserved and received as the Word of God.
This is consistent throughout the whole Bible. Never once is the term “Scripture” used to describe an original manuscript. It always speaks of the Word of God as preserved in the hands of God’s people, the custodians of the faith, to whom the oracles of God were committed, Romans 3:2, and in like manner, in every generation, among those who are members of the household of faith. The preservation of holy scripture was never left to scholars, nor shut up among the curiosities of men, but openly committed to the household of faith itself, the living witness which stands as “the pillar and ground of the truth.” I Timothy 3:15. To them, as Paul declares, “were committed the oracles of God,” Romans 3:2, and through them the scriptures have been preserved in every age, not by clever reasoning but by the absolute authority of God, ensuring that the household of faith might ever hold the lamp of truth in their hands, unbroken, unquenched, and shining through every generation until the end of time. “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, but the word of our God shall stand for ever.” Isaiah 40:8.
And it is here, among Christ’s sheep, that the scriptures remain, guarded and maintained not by clever reasoning but by the faithfulness of Almighty God, Matthew 24:35, that across the centuries the sheep of Christ’s pasture might be called and gathered by the voice of their Shepherd. John 10:16. In other words, the Bible was never meant to be a relic of the past, but a living Word preserved among Christ’s people in every age. Inspiration is not locked up in some long-lost autograph, but lives on in the preserved Scriptures God has given to His church. “My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.” Isaiah 59:21.
Some argue that the King James Bible has been faithfully preserved, yet somehow deny that it is inspired. But how could such a thing be possible? If what God originally gave was inspired, then to preserve it is to preserve that inspiration. Inspiration does not evaporate in transmission. To claim otherwise is theological double talk, an attempt to separate what God has joined together. Preservation without inspiration would reduce the Scriptures to a lifeless relic, a mere form without the Spirit, like a corpse embalmed but no longer living. But the Word of God is not dead; it is “quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword.” Hebrews 4:12. What good would it do us if the Lord merely secured the form of His words, yet withheld the divine breath that gives them life? Inspiration cannot be limited to a one-time event in the distant past, for the Bible itself testifies that, “all scripture is given by inspiration of God,” II Timothy 3:16, present tense, not was. If Timothy’s “holy scriptures” (copies) were inspired, then so are the preserved Scriptures in our hands today. Otherwise, the promise of God is void, and the people of God are left with a book that looks like Scripture but lacks the authority and power of Scripture. Such a notion not only undermines faith, it contradicts the very nature of God who has magnified His Word above all His name. Psalm 138:2.
Among the prevailing opinions of modern scholarship/criticism is their assumption that God’s direct involvement with His Word ceased once the original autographs were penned. Inspiration, they say, was confined to that first act of breathing out His words, and preservation is acknowledged only so far as it relates to the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. Beyond this narrow scope, the transmission of Scripture is treated as little more than a human enterprise, fallible men making fallible copies, translators exercising only their own skill, but without the living hand of God. Yet this view strips preservation of its very power, reducing it to a natural process rather than the providential work of the Spirit. To suppose that the God who gave His Word with infallible care would then abandon it to the corruption of apostate men is nothing less than unbelief masquerading as biblical scholarship. Such a thought diminishes the supremacy of Christ over His own Word, and makes man the final authority. If the Lord has promised to keep His Word pure in every generation, Psalm 12:6-7, then translation itself must be under His guiding hand, lest His promise be made void.
And this is the inevitable result, to deny God’s active hand in preservation is to embrace what can only be called a deistic view of Scripture, as though God merely breathed them out at the beginning, wound them up like a clock, and then stepped aside to let the ravages of time take their toll for better or for worse. After all, it's only God's holy word, the voice by which He makes His truth known to His people.” John 10:27. Would God, having breathed out His Word, then entrust its safekeeping to the careless custody of Augustinian monks or to the rigid traditions of pharisaical scribes to safeguard His inspired text? Shall we imagine that through the long centuries of the reign of papal popes, who did everything in their power to conceal the Scriptures from the common people, God stood aloof, watching His Word bound in cloisters and chained to pulpits? Or that He left it to the skeptical ravings of “Bible” scholars gone mad, dissecting the living Word as though it were a dead specimen, or to so-called ministers who bow down before the shifting sands of Greek definitions as though the original tongues were gods in themselves?
This is not the God of the Bible. His Word is not a relic to be buried in the ruins of history, but a living, abiding seed, I Peter 1:23, incorruptible, eternal, preserved by the same hand that first gave it. The LORD does not merely observe history, but He minutely orders, directs, and orchestrates every single event in time in an all-comprehensive manner to the glory of His infinite majesty and power. “Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power, for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.” Revelation 4:11. Would the God who thundered from Sinai, who wrote with His own finger upon tablets of stone, now fall silent and surrender His testimony to the slow decay of parchment and the endless disputations of “biblical” scholars, men who, under the guise of wisdom, have done all within their power to undermine the Bible? How can that be? The same God who spoke with power then still speaks with power now. What Rome once attempted by locking away the Scriptures from the common people, the modern critics attempt by eroding confidence in their authority. One sought to chain the Bible; the other seeks to destroy its credibility. Yet in both cases the aim is the same, to keep the Word of God from being received as it is in truth, the living, abiding voice of the Almighty.
The same God who gave His Word has also kept it living in the tongues of His people. “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” Matthew 24:35. His words remain not only in ancient manuscripts, but in the tongues of His people, preserved by the same God who first gave them. What blind reasoning could ever persuade us that the Lord, having supernaturally inspired and preserved His Word, would then withdraw and abandon the work of translation to the pride and arrogance of human reason? Are we to believe that God, who governs the fall of a sparrow and numbers the hairs of our head, would leave the most precious treasure He has entrusted to His people, the very words of life, to stand or fall on the skill of scholars? To imagine that God left His Word at the mercy of scholars is to make man the keeper of Scripture instead of God. If He preserves His Word, He also governs its passage into the tongues of His people. Preservation that does not reach the common tongue is preservation in name only. If the word of the LORD is to be “very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it,” Deuteronomy 30:14; Romans 10:8, then it must be in the tongue His people understand. The Lord, in His mercy, has ever made His Word plain to His people, clothing eternal truth in the tongue of common men, ensuring that His Word is not a sealed artifact, but the living voice of the Shepherd to His sheep. “The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” John 6:63.
The tragedy of modern versions is not simply their contradictions, but their consensus, that man sits as judge over the Word of God. In their arrogance, men have placed God’s Word on the dissection table and are handling it like a corpse to be examined, subjecting it to their scalpel, not realizing that it is they who will one day be judged by it. John 12:48. Such tampering has only one result, a Bible reshaped in the likeness of man rather than received as the voice of God. Men have reconstructed the Bible after their own image. Instead of bowing to the authority of God’s Word, they have refashioned it to reflect their own philosophies, their own doubts, their own culture, and their own sin. Where God has spoken plainly, they insert ambiguity; where He has exalted Christ, they diminish Him; where He has drawn clear lines, they blur them. This is not preservation but perversion, not translation but distortion. It is the old lie of the serpent clothed in modern scholarship, “yea, hath God said?” To reconstruct the Bible after man’s image is to dethrone God and enthrone human wisdom. Every time a verse is cut away, every time Christ’s deity is diminished, every time the objective “faith” of Christ is substituted for the subjected “faith” in Christ, (otherwise known as Luther’s sola fide,) or the propitiatory work of Christ is diminished, the hand of man reshapes Scripture into a reflection of himself. But in contrast to man’s tampering, we behold the hand of God guiding His Word with perfect care.
Here the contrast is plain, man corrupts, but God preserves, and it is in this very contrast that we behold the marvel of God’s providence in history. He raised up men, fitted them with rare ability, and ordered the times so that the translation of His Word into the English tongue was carried out with meticulous care. Yet our confidence is not in the brilliance of men, but in the faithfulness of Christ, who declared that His words shall never pass away.
Here is a challenge to those who dismiss this so-called “extreme” view: If not the Authorized Version, then what? Name the Bible to which you will bow without hesitation, the book whose every word you receive as the voice of God. If you cannot identify a present and preserved Scripture, then you have no absolute authority at all, only the shifting sands of human opinion and scholarship. But Christ’s sheep do not live by uncertainty; they live by “every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” Matthew 4:4. The question cannot be avoided, was the Spirit of God at work in the giving of the Authorized Version? If the answer is “no,” then we are left with nothing more than the work of men, subject to error and uncertainty, and the church has no sure Bible in her hands. But if the answer is “yes,” and we confess that it is, then the Scripture we hold is not merely the fruit of human scholarship, but the result of God Himself guiding and overruling, so that His Word might be faithfully transmitted to His people.
It is with some reluctance that I take this further step, for I have no desire to offend those who preach Christ, yet necessity compels me to say a few things plainly. Thinking about those who have preached, or who are presently engaged in declaring the gospel, one cannot help but notice how many of them use only the King James or Authorized Version. Perhaps it provides them with a feeling of standing in the “old paths,” or gives a certain air of orthodoxy, tradition, or calvinistic flavor. Yet one cannot help but wonder how many truly regard it as the very Word of God, inerrant and preserved. Many will say that it is the most faithful translation, drawn from the most trustworthy text, and that they stand emphatically upon all which the bible teaches, taking it as their final authority. (One cannot but wonder, if it’s their final authority, what is their other authority?) But when pressed, that “final” authority often turns out to be something else, some imagined reconstruction of “the originals,” or the turn of a lexicon or word study that will usually tilt in the direction of one’s preconceptions. In this way, the KJV becomes for them more a banner to wave than a foundation to rest upon. They climb aboard the King James bandwagon with great enthusiasm, but quickly disembark at the first stop, the so-called “original text,” (which, ironically, does not exist,) where human scholarship lures them from trusting God’s preserved Word. They all follow the breadcrumbs of one another, lest they fall out of fellowship with their fellow deniers of an inspired Bible.
How often have we heard this expression? “This is the best translation!” Why does everybody talk like that, all following one another’s tail, as if mouthing the same safe phrase were proof of conviction? It sounds orthodox, it sounds traditional, but it is little more than a borrowed cloak of credibility. To call the Bible merely “the best” is to imply degrees of imperfection, as if God’s Word were a matter of preference rather than certainty. Saying “the best translation” is not conviction but compromise, and it dodges the real question. Do you believe it is the Word of God?
In this present dark age, when delusion runs unchecked and error parades itself as truth, it is all the more needful that those who name the name of Christ be rooted and grounded in the certainty of God’s preserved Word. “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Psalm 11:3. To be unsettled here is to leave ourselves open to every wind of doctrine, and to be swept along with the erroneous conclusions of the skeptics.
There is so much more that could be said, from ancient tamperings, to Origen’s Alexandrian corruptions, to Jerome’s Vulgate, and down through Westcott and Hort with their so-called “new” text, to which I might add, that these two men, along with those who embrace their skepticism, must rightly be named among the chief corruptors of the Word of God, who have done more to destroy the reputability of scripture than any that have gone before, by exalting a handful of corrupt manuscripts over the time-tested text of the church, they sowed seeds of doubt that have borne bitter fruit in nearly every modern version. The lingering effect of their work has not been greater confidence in the Bible, but a widespread suspicion that no Bible can be fully trusted, as though the voice of God must be filtered through the judgment of critics. Their legacy is confusion, not clarity; uncertainty, not assurance.
God is not the author of confusion, I Corinthians 14:33, yet confusion is exactly what arises when the authority of Scripture is questioned and parceled out among a multitude of competing versions, allowing scholars and publishers to set themselves as arbiters of truth, rather than falling down before the absolute authority of Scripture. Each new rendering, each alteration of words, echoes the ancient whisper of the serpent, “Yea, hath God said?” Instead of one sure voice, men are met with a babble of contradictions, and doubt spreads like leaven until confidence in Scripture itself is weakened, a slow erosion that strikes at the very heart of the gospel witness. What man unsettles with his revisions, God establishes with His unchanging Word. Isaiah 40:8.
With these thoughts in mind, I will go out on a limb to confess that I am “shipwrecked” in the persuasion, (which many may call extreme,) that the Authorized King James Bible is God’s inspired, preserved, and only authority; the sure and settled Word of God in our own tongue, and present and perfect testimony of His truth in English, and that God still speaks, and that his voice can be distinctly heard speaking in this word. Anything less than this inevitably reduces God’s promises to the myths of “lost originals,” depriving the sheep of Christ’s fold of the one sure voice of their Shepherd, and leaving them to wander amid the clamor of man’s opinions.
For me, the matter can end no other way. If God has preserved salvation in Christ, then He has likewise preserved His Word, the very instrument by which that salvation is made known. “Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart, for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.” Jeremiah 15:16. MPJ
Additional Comments: Thanks, brother. That was a very long post, and I really appreciate you or anyone taking the time to read it. I actually started writing it a few months back and only stumbled across it again on Friday. After proofreading it three or four times, I noticed some repetition here and there, but honestly I was so weary of re-reading it that I just decided to post it as it stood. My desire is that it might prove helpful to those confused about this important matter of Bible preservation, and what people dismissively label “King James onlyism,” a term I don’t much care for. For me, it’s not about waving a banner for a translation or a party spirit, but about clinging to the certainty that God has not left His people without a sure and settled Word. I believe this is a matter of confidence in the faithfulness of Christ, not merely in the skill of translators or the traditions of men. If the sheep of Christ are to know the Shepherd’s voice, then that voice must be clear, preserved, and distinct. That is why I wrote what I did, not to stir debate, but to encourage trust in the living Word of God that still speaks with absolute authority today. With brotherly love in Christ, Marc
Hey brother, I appreciate the question. It's a good one. When I speak of the King James Bible as the inspired and preserved Word of God, I’m not narrowing that down to the first 1611 printing with its spelling quirks, marginal notes, or printer’s errors. What I’m speaking of is the text itself, the inspired words, not the incidental features like old spellings or typesetting of a particular edition. The same way we don’t say Timothy had to hold the very first parchment of Isaiah to have “the Scriptures,” II Timothy 3:15, we don’t need to hold the very first printed sheets from 1611 to have God’s Word today. The translators’ work, brought forth by God’s providence, gave us a settled English Bible. Later printings only corrected typographical slips and standardized spelling, but the substance, the inspired, preserved words, remained the same. So, no, the claim isn’t that only the first printing of 1611 was inspired, but that the Authorized Version, as God has preserved and carried it forward, is His pure Word in English. Hope that's sorta helpful. Marc