Divine Authority: One of my relatives, who shall remain unnamed, has managed to gather together as much intellectual rubbish and outright moral insanity as one can possibly fit onto a single platform, ideas that defy not only Scripture, but the simplest laws of reason and life itself. She champions causes that defy God’s created order, abortion as a right, the denial of gender, truth as emotion, and the celebration of confusion and perversity. And yet, astonishingly, her public platform, followed by multitudes, is subtitled simply TRUTH.

Ask my wife how hard I laughed the first time I saw her platform was titled “truth,” and then ask her again how my laughter turned to astonishment when I saw how many followed her. An army of the deceived, driven by feelings, intoxicated with pride, and 100% confident that they alone have it all figured out. “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil.” Isaiah 5:20. People, in my thoughts, glued to their screens, trading opinions like truth and peddling emotion as insight, who have no thought of God and no time to seek the Lord. He is literally in none of their thoughts, and when they do call upon His name, they call upon an idol of their own imagination, a god who accepts them as they are, because, after all, that’s just the “nice” thing to do. And though some may still profess a certain respect for the Scriptures, it reaches no deeper than convenience; they choose the verses that soothe them, the parts that comfort, just in case everything doesn’t work out in the end.

Pilate’s question still echoes through every generation, “what is truth?” John 18:38. It is the same question the world still asks as it gropes along in its own darkness, not really to find the answer, but to avoid it. “For this people’s heart is waxed gross…” Matthew 13:15. Truth was not hidden that day; it stood before Pilate in Christ, and still that same voice speaks from the pages of Scripture, yet man prefers his illusions, proving that apart from divine grace, he will always choose darkness rather than light. John 3:19. What man praises as free thought, Scripture condemns as pride. Yet the God who owed us nothing has spoken! And what He has spoken is enough, light, truth, and glory in His Son, Jesus Christ. Hebrews 1:1-2.

There, divine authority stands unshaken, unaltered by time or opinion. In that light alone, we must seek the truth. Here alone is light for those who walk in darkness, truth for those who would otherwise perish in their own thoughts. Outside of this blessed book, man gropes in darkness. All his brilliance, all his progress, all his philosophy cannot kindle a single beam of true light. The world’s amusements, its games, its glitter, its endless distractions, all will prove empty and bitter disappointments in the end. This is the cruel irony of our age, even as the lights grow brighter, the hearts grow emptier. These endless diversions cannot teach, cannot save, cannot satisfy. “One thing needful.” Luke 10:42.

In the end, truth belongs to revelation, not to human discovery. Hidden from the wise and revealed to the broken, that no flesh should glory in His presence. I Corinthians 1:29. And I truly believe that once revealed, it ceases to be an object of speculation and becomes the atmosphere of thought itself. Colossians 3:16. There is no truth elsewhere, there is no other standard, there is no other authority! Once truth is revealed, it is not simply received, it consumes and transforms. The proud mind yields to truth, the rebellious heart bows low, and we, by grace, believe “the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.” John 2:22. We have no tribunal above scripture, no court of appeal against it. Through all our days, the one great inquiry remains the same, “what saith the LORD?” All else must be silent before that voice. MPJ

Dogs: “Beware of dogs.” Philippians 3:2. In speaking of those who trouble the gospel, our concern is not with the careless world but with the confessing church, those who profess to know grace, yet by subtle turns of doctrine undermine it. Chief among these are many who call themselves “reformed” or “calvinist,” adorning their system with the polished phrase “the doctrines of grace,” as though the truth of God could be divided into compartments or Christ Himself reduced to a series of points. And, I'm not singling out the calvinist or the reformed because of some petty grievance or sectarian spite. That is not the case at all! It is because their teaching comes so perilously close to the truth, that error proves all the more dangerous. Isn’t there an old proverb that says, “the nearer a falsehood approaches the truth, the more dangerous it becomes?” That is exactly the case here.

What makes certain aspects of their theology so perilous is not a rejection of scripture, but its misuse. It's not that they stand aloof from holy scripture, but that they press close to its borders while presenting Christ through a lens clouded by law. Their words are full of Christ, but it is a Christ partly concealed, where grace is mingled with law, and his preeminent glory dimmed by conditions. Another reason I single out the reformed and the calvinist is because I truly believe that within their gatherings exist many who love Christ and delight in His salvation. But here is the heartache, for all their sincerity, even these are too often swept along by the subtle misguidance of a gospel mixed with works. And since what I write is always aimed toward the household of faith, and toward those who are inquiring in the ways of Christ, it is to them that Paul’s solemn voice still resounds, “beware of dogs.” Philippians 3:1-3.

That sounds exceptionally harsh and unloving, but there is nothing unloving in defending the gospel of Christ. Paul uses strong language because eternal things were in view. Those who deviate from the simplicity of Christ, however sincere, disorient the soul, even though they speak with Scripture’s authority, in pleading for holiness and good works. Wonderful, we need more “holiness” and “good” works amongst those that confess Christ, and the Scriptures are clear, those who name the name of Christ, depart from iniquity. II Timothy 2:19. But when obedience is made the condition rather than the consequence of grace, the gospel’s peace is lost, and Christ’s glory is diminished, and what may appear outwardly to promote a holy life often works in practice to obscure the very source of holiness, Christ Himself, until He is nearly eclipsed from view.

Once grace and works are confused, the sinner’s eyes are turned from Christ to his own efforts, to a mutilated gospel, one that is dressed in all the right clothes, but conceals the dagger of self-righteousness beneath its robe. II Samuel 3:27. And how does this confusion spread? It spreads through pulpits, through teachers who drape their words in the language of holiness, but who subtly shift the ground of justification onto obedience and a transformation of life. Faith, they subtly imply, must prove itself in works before God will declare a man righteous. The claim has an air of reverence, draped in words about repentance, obedience, and godly living. Who could resist such words? And yet this is the snare, what sounds biblical in tone actually redirects trust away from Christ, and so undermines the very gospel it claims to defend.

For if a changed life is made part of our justification, then the question must be faced, how much change is enough? How holy must I become before God will declare me righteous? Must we forever put ourselves on the scales, testing and retesting whether our lives display enough change? If so, who among us can stand? One day will condemn the other, and joy and sorrow will fluctuate, leaving the soul chained to uncertainty. Such a religion breeds doubt, not faith; despair, not joy. It binds the conscience to itself, instead of freeing it to Christ. If it depends on us, wouldn't any sense of true scriptural assurance be forever out of reach? To sum it all up, how changed must my life be before God can declare me just? What measure must I reach to obtain that verdict? Tell me then, on this scale of “biblical” conformity, when am I permitted to breathe easy, confident God has actually justified me?

Speak plainly to those who peddle this law/gospel mixture, and, “in no wise,” they will reply, “do our works earn God’s verdict, and do not contribute anything to salvation,” yet with equal force they add, “but without them you cannot be justified.” They are said to be worthless, yet indispensable. What strange contradiction is this? A riddle that only unbelief could invent, and is it any wonder that so many live their days under the shadow of uncertainty, bound by invisible chains that none but Christ can break. You can almost see it written on their faces, weary traces of a lifelong servitude to law. They dare not deny the grace of Christ, for they have been taught from childhood that salvation is by grace; yet a dread of presumption holds them back from resting in that grace. It masquerades as humility, but it is unbelief in disguise. They tremble to claim what they feel no warrant for, and so they hover between hope and fear, between law and grace, never entering into the joy of the Lord. Such may indeed hear their entire lives that “it is finished,” but still their conscience insists that it cannot be that simple. What could be more tragic? They live beneath the sound of the gospel, yet never taste its joy. This is the fruit of a gospel half-law, half-grace, confusion, not Christ. For once conditions and works are added to justification, the message of grace is corrupted, and it ceases to be the gospel at all. Yet as we seek to expose such error, we do so as those whom Christ continually delivers from error ourselves, daily delivering us from our own distortions of truth. God’s preserving grace is our only safeguard, Jude 1:1, for who among us sees all things clearly? We are but dust, upheld only by the same grace we seek to defend, so when we raise our voice against that which distorts the gospel, we do so as one who knows his own weakness, dust upheld by grace, pleading with others to look where we ourselves have found mercy, in Christ alone. Romans 9:3-4.

It is a grief, for many imagine they are strengthening or safeguarding the gospel or serving Christ, yet by tampering with its liberty and shifting the eye from Christ to what lies within, they bind themselves with a burden too heavy to bear. It is the very bondage the apostles warned against, “a yoke which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear.” And tragically, in seeking righteousness by something short of Christ, they obscure the righteousness freely given in Christ. It is like asking the prisoner to forge his own chains, or the dying man to heal himself. Such a burden crushes, because it is built on the delusion that man can add to what Christ has already accomplished, but the gospel stands in its plain glory. Christ is the gospel’s simplicity, and Christ is its glory. To add is to subtract, for all additions blur the clear light of distinguishing grace that radiates from Him alone. Hebrews 1:3.

Additionally, the truth of justification is not locked behind doors for the scholar or moralist to unlock; it is a straight path, so clear that even a child can follow. May we not be unsettled by those who dress it up with clever formulations, for the gospel needs no ornament but Christ. Paul himself warns us not to be led away “from the simplicity that is in Christ.” Christ died, Christ rose, Christ reigns! In Christ alone the sinner is justified, apart from works, apart from merit, apart from any “other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” Acts 4:12. MPJ

Offence of the Cross: The great offence of the gospel, the scandal that the natural heart cannot endure, is this, that everything a man does is defiled. Every thought, every motive, every deed bears the stain of sin. It tells man the truth about himself, that his heart is unclean, his motives corrupt, and his deeds polluted. It leaves him with nothing to offer and nowhere to stand, save in the mercy of God. And because of that, nothing he does can ever make him acceptable before God. That is the offence. It was the same in Paul’s day as it is now. The heart struggles to accept that all its goodness amounts to nothing, and ever seeks to insert some condition, some effort, some trace of self that might help complete what Christ has already finished. Man absolutely refuses to believe that his righteousness has no value before God.

But this is the very thing the cross forbids. The cross proclaims that man has nothing to offer. It leaves no room for self-importance, no space for merit, no contribution for human pride. The natural heart recoils from that. It wants to believe that at least in part, perhaps in obedience, or in repentance, or in faith itself, there is something to commend me before God. “Surely,” the sinner insists, “my sincerity, my moral effort, my devotion must count for something.” Yet the “cross” answers back, no, all that matters is Christ!

From the root of his being, man’s righteousness is defiled. Even his finest virtues, when set beside the holiness of God, emit the stench of corruption. The cross exposes this illusion and proclaims that acceptance with God cannot be earned, supplemented, or maintained by human effort. It rests wholly, immovably, and eternally in the finished work of Christ alone.

This is why the gospel message provokes such hostility. Tell a man that apart from Christ he is lost, and you will touch the nerve of his pride. He is not offended because he loves truth, but because he loves himself. He cannot endure the thought that his goodness counts for nothing. Immediately he protests, “I am not deserving of hell!” or “surely you don’t mean that good, kind, selfless people, my grandmother, my neighbor, are condemned without Christ?” Yet that is exactly what the gospel declares. Without Christ, the goodness of the best stands on the same ground as the wickedness of the worst, both spring from a heart estranged from God. Without Christ, there is no life, no righteousness, no hope. That is the glory and the offence of the cross, that man is nothing, and Christ is all. “But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.” Galatians 6:14. MPJ

Accursed: “For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh.” Romans 9:3. Coming across this difficult verse, and hearing yet another poor exegesis of it, my mind wandered back to something I read about forty years ago, if I recall, in Jonathan Edwards, (though I no longer have his writings to confirm,) but yet, I distinctly remember in one place where he speaks of a believer’s absolute submission to God’s sovereignty, even if it should mean his own destruction. At the time, I remember thinking, “what? I’ve never heard of anything like this before, if this is what real piety looks like, then I’m finished!” Presumably it was just a way of saying that God’s glory should be prized above all else, even self-preservation. This certainly sounds like the very height of godliness, as if nothing could be more spiritual. Call it what you will, but it feels like the spiritual equivalent of volunteering for the gallows, just to make sure everyone knows how devoted and humble you are, and unless spoken in figurative or hypothetical sense it's not real!

Whilst I truly enjoy reading the so-called puritans, and a few men like Edwards who attempted to follow in their wake, I think their spirituality, at least as they described it, isn’t above scrutiny. Ultimately, all such claims, and I'm thinking especially of the tendency to project a height of piety unobtainable by the ‘ordinary’ believer, must be weighed by the truth of Scripture and the test of lived reality, as life has a way of reminding us that we are but “dust and ashes.” Genesis 18:27. Mere words can make us appear very spiritual, but reality unmasks us as we truly are, sinful, weak, and utterly dependent upon Christ for everything. John 15:5.

Back then to the matter at hand, and to that staggering phrase in Romans 9:3, Paul’s declaration of being “accursed from Christ for his brethren’s sake.” What does such a statement mean, and how are we to understand it? I just read John Gill on that verse, as he has a large section in his commentary devoted to its exposition. After reading that, I'm more confused than ever! What in the world did he even just say? Gill's long windedness drives me crazy! As best I can piece it together, he suggests that Paul’s words about being “accursed from Christ” are either hyperbolic or refer to something short of damnation, perhaps being cut off from the visible church, or even offering his life for Israel’s temporal good. In short, according to Gill, Paul is expressing deep love for his kinsmen according to the flesh, but not a literal desire to be eternally cut off from Christ. Okay, no wonder everybody's so confused, we're all too busy reading Gill, or more like trying to find our way out of his long paragraphs.

We know Paul’s words are no exaggeration when he says he bore “great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.” Romans 9:2. But who was the object of this grief? For whom, then, was Paul in such anguish of spirit? His words suggest a narrower focus than simply “every Israelite.” Whilst the apostle does indeed speak of his “kinsmen according to the flesh,” but the language he chooses indicates that his grief centers on a particular people within that larger body, and I would suggest, in the light of other scripture, that he is referring to the elect who had not yet been brought into the “fellowship” of the gospel. I John 1:3.

His sorrow was not a vague nationalistic sentiment, nor a romantic attachment to his heritage, but the deep anguish of one who understood that many of God’s elect were, for the present, still veiled in blindness, awaiting the hour when Christ Himself would open their eyes and bring them into His marvelous light. At first glance, it might appear too narrow to limit this to the elect, but consider the following. First, how he addresses them, “my brethren.” On the surface this might appear nothing more than a racial reference, Paul the Jew speaking of his Jewish brethren. But when Paul uses this word everywhere else, Romans 12:1, I Corinthians 15:1, Philippians 4:1, &c., the pattern is remarkably consistent. “Brethren” is his word for those who are in Christ, fellow believers, those joined to him in the fellowship of the gospel. To interpret this one occurrence differently, as though he were suddenly shifting its meaning to a merely racial category, stretches his language in a way that does not harmonize with the rest of scripture. It is far more consistent to see him speaking of the brethren who were elect, though not yet gathered in, rather than of the nation in a blanket sense.

Next, Paul uses the word “Israelites.” This term can apply broadly, both to the elect and to the reprobate. As he will clarify in verse 6, “not all Israel are of Israel.” So I believe there is some warrant to understand that when Paul calls them “Israelites,” he is not simply applying the name to all who descended from Jacob. Rather, his eye is fixed on those within that body who belong to the true Israel by promise, the elect, his kinsmen according to the flesh, yet distinguished by God’s eternal choice. In using this name, he is not speaking of the nation indiscriminately, but pointing to Israel as defined by God’s promise, the chosen remnant hidden among his brethren. These are the ones for whom his heart was most burdened, those elect according to promise, his true brethren in the spirit, for whom he travailed with unceasing grief until Christ should be formed in them.

Paul then goes further and calls them “the adoption.” Here his anguish is directed toward those who were marked out for sonship, those included in God’s plan of adoption. It is striking that this word is found nowhere else in Scripture except on Paul’s pen. He uses it only four times in the New Testament, and every instance ties it unmistakably to God’s electing grace. In Galatians 4:5 he writes that Christ came “to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons.” In Ephesians 1:5, he declares that God “predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will.” And in Romans 8:15, he reminds believers, “ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.” In each case, adoption belongs to the chosen family of God, never to the reprobate or unbelieving.

It would be unthinkable, then, for Paul to turn suddenly in Romans 9 and wrench this incredibly important word into an entirely different meaning, as though it now applied broadly to all Israel after the flesh. That would not only cut across the flow of Paul’s thought from chapter 8, where adoption is bound to God’s electing grace and the Spirit’s witness, but it would drain the word of the gospel weight Paul has carefully laid upon it. Nor does the Old Testament ever use this term. Adoption is Paul’s distinctive word, always tied to the elect’s new standing as sons through Christ, it's a believer’s sonship, a privilege flowing out of God’s election and Christ’s redeeming work. To stretch it here to include the unbelieving mass of Israel would be to make Paul contradict himself, and to empty the word of its gospel weight.

For those reasons, I suggest Paul’s anguish cannot be understood as a vague, national grief. His burden is not for “Israel” indiscriminately, but for those elect sons yet unborn of the Spirit, the children of promise not yet brought into the light of Christ. And yet, even as Paul fixes his eye on the elect within Israel, he cannot overlook the privileges that had been lavished upon the nation as a whole. This, I think, is why Paul does not stop at their election yet unseen; instead he presses further, setting before them the staggering advantages entrusted to Israel, advantages that render their unbelief all the more tragic. Romans 9:4-5. He lists the astonishing privileges they had been given, the law, the promises, the fathers, and supremely, Christ Himself according to the flesh. And yet, in the hour of their great visitation, they hardened themselves and rejected the very Messiah who had come through their own line. I think that this is the anguish that crushed Paul’s heart. Does not Paul’s lament here remind us of Christ Himself, who wept over Jerusalem and cried, “behold, your house is left unto you desolate.” Matthew 23:37-38. Paul’s lament is but an echo of Christ’s own grief, the sorrow of watching those most richly blessed turn away from the only fountain of life. Paul knew that within that blinded nation were elect souls, chosen of God, not yet brought into the light. For them he travailed, longing for the day when Christ would be formed in them. His grief was not empty, but bound to the certainty that God’s promises never fail. Galatians 4:19.

Verse 5 ties everything back to Christ. Of whom are the fathers, and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, “who is over all, God blessed for ever.” Every promise, every glory, every father pointed to Christ, and outside of Him there is no life, only death. To be without Christ is to be nothing, and to have nothing; no life, no hope, no future, only the emptiness of one cut off from its only source of life, light and hope itself. John 14:6. This is the grief that weighed on Paul’s heart, and with the solemnity of it, he can only end with a seal of certainty, Amen, so it is, and so it must be. Acts 4:12. MPJ

Calvin & Servetus: Brother, my heart goes out to you in hearing of your afflictions. If you mentioned them earlier, forgive me for failing to hold them in mind. But from now on they will not be forgotten. May the Lord remind me often to pray for you. I also appreciate you bringing up the Servetus question. (The Servetus incident was the 1553 execution of Michael Servetus in Geneva for heresy, carried out by the magistrates with Calvin’s approval.) Honestly, it wasn’t something I’d have thought to take up again, but since others have asked about it before, I went back through some earlier thoughts, and along with some notes, there was this quote by John Calvin, which is spot on, so I'm going to begin by sharing that.

“We ought to read the Scriptures with the express design of finding Christ in them. Whoever shall turn aside from this object, though he may weary himself throughout his whole life in learning, will never attain the knowledge of the truth; for what wisdom can we have without the wisdom of God?” Commentary on John 5:39. 1553. What a Christ-exalting truth. Calvin reminds us that Christ is not merely in the Scriptures, but is their very center and end. Luke 24:27.

When I think of Calvin, I’m struck by how short his life was, and how much of it was marked by excruciating pain. He endured migraines, asthma, tuberculosis, and even painful kidney stones that left him writhing, yet he pressed on with his labors to the end. Though he died at just fifty-four, and though his days were filled with sickness and trial, he persevered, sealing his short life with a testimony of unshaken confidence in Christ. In a letter written near the end of his life, to William Farel, April 2, 1564, he writes, “as for me, I am fast going down-hill, and draw nigh to death; nor is it to be wondered at if I feel weary and faint after such weakness. But it is enough for me that I live and die in Christ, who is gain to all his people, both in life and in death.” From his will, written just weeks before his death, he says, “I give thanks to God that He has had mercy upon me, whom He has made partaker of His gospel, and has given me grace to serve Him by means of my work.” I can scarcely read these words without feeling ashamed of my own unthankfulness. Calvin, wasting away in weakness, gives thanks simply for the fact that the LORD had brought him into the fellowship of the gospel.

I’m also reminded of the Puritan John Owen, who endured sorrows almost beyond belief. He buried eleven children in succession, lost his wife, suffered under ongoing weakness of body, bore the shame of political disgrace, and felt the pressures of persecution, and yet through it all, the Lord kept him thankful, fixated on the glory of Christ. And like Calvin, his testimony was not of resentment but of Christ. At the end his words were still full of Christ. From his final letter to a friend, dated August 23, 1683, one day before his death, Owen writes, “I am going to Him whom my soul hath loved, or rather, who hath loved me with an everlasting love, which is the whole ground of all my consolation. The passage is very irksome and wearisome, through strong pains of various sorts which are all issued in an intermittent fever. All the things of the other world are grown exceedingly small. Oh, how vain is everything in respect of Christ, and the salvation of the gospel!” What astonishes me most is that Christ so filled his thoughts, that even at the very door of death he could see all else as nothing, and Christ alone as his everlasting treasure.

I’d better stop myself before I start rambling on about ‘reformation’ history or parliamentarian history, two of my favored side topics, so back to Servetus. It goes without saying that what follows is largely my own conjecture, perhaps better called perspective, offered from more of a historical lens than a strictly scriptural one. But whatever the path, our desire is to bring every thread back to the Scriptures and to Christ. It is worth noticing that those who most eagerly bring up the Servetus affair are usually not sincere seekers of truth, but opponents of the gospel itself. Arminians, skeptics, and enemies of sovereign grace often seize upon this single episode as a weapon to discredit the doctrines Calvin taught. They are less concerned with Servetus’ fate than with using his death to obscure the glory of Christ’s finished work, and to tarnish the memory of a man whose chief offense was exalting God’s sovereignty and exposing the emptiness of human merit.

This incident has long stood as the darkest blot on John Calvin’s legacy, yet I believe that much distortion surrounds the event. The picture of Geneva as a blood-stained tyranny under Calvin is greatly exaggerated. In fact, history records only two (compared with the tens of thousands slain by the Roman Inquisition) capital punishments during his lifetime, the beheading of Jacques Gruet, who had openly conspired to murder Calvin and overthrow Geneva’s government, and the burning of Michael Servetus, who had long been condemned throughout Europe as a heretic. It's worth mentioning that Servetus wasn’t an innocent victim of Calvin’s personal vendetta; he was a long-standing agitator, a denier of the Trinity, and condemned by both Roman Catholics and Protestants alike. His case exposes more the mindset of sixteenth-century Europe, where heresy was treated as a civil crime threatening the fabric of society, than Calvin’s personal cruelty. Additionally, Calvin though he approved of Servetus’ execution as just, himself had no civil authority to arrest or execute; these were decisions carried out by Geneva’s magistrates. Still, his theological approval of Servetus’ execution as a blasphemer and “murderer of souls” reveals the limitations of his thinking, and the blind spot of the reformers who still tied church and state together, still entangled in medieval assumptions that the church must enforce orthodoxy. The lesson is clear, the gospel is defended not by the magistrate’s sword but by Christ’s Word. Calvin was a gifted servant of God, yet like all men, he was fallible and in need of the same grace he preached.

Thus, while we may honor Calvin as a profound teacher and instrument in God’s hand, we must also recognize that his approval of Servetus’ death was a serious departure from the spirit of Christ. It reminds us that history, though infallibly ordered and maintained, is full of flawed vessels, men who advanced the cause of truth, yet remained in need of the very grace they proclaimed. MPJ

Females: In the warmer months, much of my writing begins from the back deck, where a large oak and walnut tree sort of frame the view. After I got home from work last week some time, I sat down to begin some reading and was interrupted by two squirrels that were chattering loudly at each other, and chasing each other from limb to limb. They kept racing around in circles, darting along the same branches again and again. Whether a male pursuing a female or the other way around, the scene made me pause in admiration of God’s handiwork and stirred a memory of something that is sort of obvious, but nevertheless most extraordinary. “When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained.” Psalm 8:3.

Let me preface this by saying that I’m no “scientist” in the world’s eyes. Besides, a genuine scientist, (literally, “one who knows,”) is not the man who boasts in his research while denying his Maker, but the one who bows before Christ, “in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” Colossians 2:3. Scripture reminds us that the foundation of all true science is the acknowledgment of the Creator Himself. “The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge.” Proverbs 1:7. But it doesn’t require advanced degrees or a laboratory to see what is plain before our eyes, life itself is a testimony to the wisdom and handiwork of God. At the very heart of His design lies this unshakable truth, “so God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Genesis 1:27.

Every creature that walks, flies, or swims bears witness to a simple but profound truth, life continues only where male and female exist together. From the smallest insect to the largest whale, reproduction requires the complementary design of male and female. No species sustains itself by male alone. Without the female, the line perishes. One generation and gone forever. Yet we find in every corner of creation, from the smallest insect to the mighty elephant, both male and female, fitly framed to continue life. Again, I'm not a scientist, but doesn't this undeniable reality pose a serious dilemma for atheistic evolution? If creatures arose by blind chance across “millions of years,” how did a corresponding female appear at the precise moment needed for life to continue? Did countless species all just happen to evolve a female companion simultaneously? Did the fish wait for millions of years for a mate while he withered alone in the sea, the deer graze without a doe, or the bee swarm without a queen? Examples could be multiplied, but no, such fables collapse under their own weight. “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.” Psalm 14:1.

The atheist faces an unanswerable riddle here? If life “evolved” by blind accident, how did the female arise in every species, with perfect timing and complementary design, capable of conception, gestation, and birth? Such coincidences defy reason. Scripture says plainly, “male and female created He them.” Genesis 1:27. Such words remind us that God’s design, the pairing of male and female, seen in every corner of life, was never partial or uncertain, but perfect, complete, and overflowing with fruitfulness from the first moment of creation. “But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowls of the air, and they shall tell thee; Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee, and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee. Who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the Lord hath wrought this?” Job 12:7-9. The order, beauty, and harmony of this design proclaim the wisdom and power of the Creator, and this creation witness cannot be silenced, but ever proclaims its unmistakable glory. “Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.” Psalm 19:2. From sunrise to sunset, creation never ceases to proclaim what man in his pride would deny, that the wisdom and power of God are written into every corner of life. “O Lord, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all, the earth is full of thy riches.” Psalm 104:24. MPJ

Antichrist: Of course, everyone perks up at this subject. This is the theme that really fascinates us. Who really wants to wrestle with the gospel, or to weigh carefully the difference between truth and error? Those things are dull and tedious. It’s only the gospel of salvation. Ephesians 1:13. Who has time these days to trace the glory of Christ through the Scriptures, or to test every doctrine by the Word of truth? We barely trouble ourselves with the gospel, scarcely pause to adore the beauty of Christ, and remain content with a shallow grasp of His Word. After all, what is it really? Only truth or error, only life or death. Nothing worth losing sleep over. “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life, and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.” John 3:36. But when it comes to antichrist, then we're all ears, then we're talking about something that really matters. A shadowy villain, a world-shaking spectacle, a headline apocalypse to tickle our imaginations. I'm tingling all over just thinking about it! Forget the risen Lord; give us the Man of Sin!

I had once determined not to wade too far into eschatological thoughts, beyond a few ‘necessary’ remarks on dispensationalism and the fevered “end-times” industry that surrounds it, as I was content to leave these matters aside. But I have changed my mind. Why? Because what passes today as common knowledge about “the antichrist” is not only built upon shaky foundations, but, in my judgment, represents a subtle assault upon the very person of Christ. The assumption runs so deep, so unquestioned, that to even challenge it feels dangerous, even heretical, to many. Across the spectrum, whether one claims pre-millennial, post-millennial, amillennial, or some hybrid historic stance, the idea of a looming, singular antichrist figure at the end of the world is simply taken for granted. The imagination of the church has been captivated by it. In this sense, “all the world wondered after the beast,” Revelation 13:3, not only in popular prophecy charts and pulp-fiction novels, but even in the supposedly more careful systems of respected theologians. But what if the whole construction is wrong? What if God’s Word directs us away from an imagined end-time tyrant, and instead exposes the antichrist spirit already at work among us? What if the true danger of antichrist has never been a shadowy political or religious leader waiting in the wings, but a present and spiritual denial of the Lord Jesus Christ Himself?

Few assumptions in the modern church run deeper, or stand less examined, than the idea of a final antichrist figure who will dominate the world stage at the end of time; yet, I am somewhat persuaded that this is not what scripture teaches, and it is precisely this assumption that must be brought to light, if we are to have a correct understanding of the present reign of Christ. To enthrone an antichrist, whether in the beginning, middle or end of some so-called “falling away” at the “end” of the age, (II Thessalonians 2:3, a verse used to build an entire escalogical system of fear around,) is exegetically unwarranted and theologically destructive, as it ignores the straightforward witness of Scripture and effectively displaces the triumphant reign of Christ with the shadow of a mythical usurper.

Those who build their eschatology around a final antichrist enthroned at the end of the age are not standing on the plain testimony of Scripture. For the Word of God consistently directs our eyes, not to some phantom usurper, but to the reigning Christ. “The LORD said unto my Lord, sit at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.” Psalm 110:1. This is the most quoted Old Testament verse in the New Testament, depicting not a deferred rule, but the present reign of Jesus Christ, enthroned until the final enemy, death itself, is destroyed. Christ now reigns from the right hand of the Father, exercising unchallengeable dominion until every foe is subdued before Him. As Paul declares, “for He must reign, till He hath put all enemies under His feet.” I Corinthians 15:25. This is no partial rule, nor a reign deferred to the end of time, but present and active sovereignty. God has already set Christ “at His own right hand in the heavenly places, far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and hath put all things under His feet, and gave Him to be the head over all things to the church.” Ephesians 1:20-22. The universal sway of His kingdom is therefore certain, and the absolute authority behind it is divine. Christ’s people live and labor under no rival throne, for the risen Lord who purchased them with His blood now governs all things for their sake. The picture is not of Christ waiting helplessly for history to unravel until antichrist arrives, but of a present enthronement, actively advancing until the last foe is defeated.

The antichrist assumption robs these texts of their plain meaning. It shifts the center of redemptive history away from Christ and onto a caricature, and enthrones a phantom ruler where Scripture enthrones the risen KING. That is the very spirit of antichrist. Christ reigns now, and He will appear at the end not to begin His reign, but to consummate the victory already secured by His cross and resurrection. “I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him; his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.” Daniel 7:13-14.

Antichrist rules the day, and that with a witness, as all the three major eschatological positions stand together and support each other at that point, though they differ in the arrangement of times and seasons, and in the charts and schemes they devise. They all unite on this, that a singular antichrist figure or spirit must emerge at history’s either tragic or triumphant end, and in so doing they turn the eyes of believers from the present reign of Christ to a caricature who lives only in their schemes. And once that premise is swallowed, the rest follows easily, believers are ushered along into a world where prophecy is no longer read but packaged, and where systems, not scripture, set the agenda. Essentially, it's a packaged commodity, and it's no surprise that we eagerly line up for what is being handed freely out. I know the feeling well; I stood in that same checkout line for years, and still find myself sorting through the residue of what I once took home. I dabbled here and there, borrowing fragments from different systems, reshaping their claims and sanding down their rough edges, until I had patched together a scheme of my own. But the more I built, the less it held together, until in the end it felt like I was simply forcing myself to believe, if that’s even possible. In truth, I was never convinced by any of them. My disillusionment with the whole field of eschatology ran so deep that for nearly twenty years I refused to touch it. Though my reading in those years was wide and voluminous, whenever a book veered toward prophecy or end-times, I closed it and moved on. Even now I usually leave the subject untouched and often act as if I know even less than I pretend to know, and speak of it as little as possible. Yet in reflecting on this antichrist assumption, I feel pressed to put something in writing, and I only hope that what I say accords with Scripture. I Thessalonians 5:21.

Of course, once you start asking questions of Scripture, you soon discover that the shelves are already well-stocked with answers, boxed, labeled, and ready to save you the trouble of thinking for yourself. I’m no stranger to that marketplace, I once bought the charts, unfolded them like treasure maps, and tried to pretend the pieces lined up; but as I already said, they never did, and I think perhaps most of us have either been or are being propelled onward because this “marketplace” of end-time theories sells nothing but prebuilt kits and cleverly designed ready-made systems, each pandering to one’s chosen bias, and many of these come complete with a denominational label and a “historic” seal of authenticity.

All of which only shows how deeply the assumptions run. And so, back to the point, simply mention antichrist, and the imagination immediately runs to a dark figure or a corrupt system expected to appear at the close of history. That’s the standard assumption, and most believers nod with confidence, “of course, I know all about him.” Yet their certainty is built, not on the testimony of Scripture, but on a scaffolding of tradition, speculation, and a molding of the scriptures to suit their eschatological imagination. The text is no longer the master but the clay, pressed into shape to prop up what they are already convinced is true. With that assumption taken as unquestionable fact, believers then comb through the Bible, piecing together verses to reinforce their conclusion. But the glaring mistake is this, instead of beginning with Scripture itself and letting it define antichrist, they start with a presumption and then force the text to fit. Had they allowed Scripture to speak first, they would have discovered something entirely different.

If we consider the term antichrist, and we limit ourselves to what the scripture declares, we will soon discover that the only inspired author who uses the word “antichrist” does not cast him as a future tyrant, but as a present reality, already at work in the world. The word “antichrist” is mentioned four times in the Bible, and all by the same inspired author. Three times in First John, and once in Second John. That’s it, only four times. 1. “Little children, it is the last time, and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.” John does not push antichrist to the distant future; he locates it in his own day, pointing to many, not one. I John 2:18. 2. “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.” I John 2:22. This is not speculation but definition. To deny Jesus as the Christ is to deny the Father, and such denial is what John calls antichrist. 3. “And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God, and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.” I John 4:3. The antichrist is not waiting in the wings of history; his spirit was already active in the first century, embodied in false teachers who denied the gospel. 4. “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.” II John 7. Again, antichrist is not one figure looming at the end of history, but many already at work; not a political tyrant, but the spiritual reality of every voice that denies Christ is come in the flesh.

This is remarkably straightforward. John makes it simple, antichrist is whoever denies Christ. I don’t see the suspense, unless, of course, we are tempted to sell prophecy books or peddle some end-times circus act. Here is the complete doctrine of antichrist in scripture, four short verses. No global dictator, no apocalyptic mastermind at the end of time, and no prophetic puzzle to decode. Instead, John says antichrist is already here, wherever the truth of Christ is denied. The sad irony is that the “church” has taken John’s plain words and refashioned them into something altogether different, whole systems of fear built around a phantom menace the bible somehow forgot to mention. Meanwhile, the true antichrist, often seated comfortably in their own assemblies, strolls past in broad daylight with a bible tucked under his arm.

John’s teaching on antichrist is the exact reverse of what most people assume. He shifts the idea from a future monster to a present reality, from one solitary figure to many, and from a single person to a heresy and doctrinal denial of Christ. What John actually does is dismantle the modern caricature of antichrist. He takes it out of the future and sets it in the present, takes it out of one man’s hands and puts it in the mouths of many, takes it out of politics and roots it in false doctrine. Again, the apostle insists on this, antichrist was no distant threat but a present reality. He says it outright in I John 2:18 and 4:3, many antichrists had already appeared; and in I John 2:22 and II John 7, he identifies them by their denial of Jesus Christ. Antichrist is not just a figure but a worldview, a distortion of Christ’s person and His finished salvation, defined not by political power but by theological denial. At its core, antichrist is anything that strips Christ of His identity or diminishes the sufficiency of His sacrifice. For antichrist is not merely a figure but a philosophy, it is a rival gospel, a twisted narrative that seeks to replace the LORD of glory with a fraud; a counterfeit gospel that always trades Christ for something smaller, something less. That denial is the heartbeat of antichrist. Colossians 2:8.

Although Scripture itself uses the word only in John’s epistles, two other places are often pressed into service to build an “image of the beast.” The first is Daniel, but that I'll just set aside for the moment, since I hold firmly that Daniel has nothing to do with what people now label “the last days,” and still less with the doomsday puzzles that collapse every decade, only to be repackaged for the next audience. Another supposed home for antichrist is the Book of Revelation, where prophecy decoders have dressed him up as the beast. But since scripture itself never makes that identification, I’ll set that aside for now as well, and attempt to bring this to a conclusion by looking at Paul's Second Letter to the Thessalonians.

Here Paul addresses believers who were unsettled by false reports about the coming of Christ, and it is here that many claim to find their strongest case for a future antichrist. “Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, that ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand.” II Thessalonians 2:1-2. This is the passage most often enlisted to prove the rise of a future antichrist; yet Paul’s concern is not to outline some distant figure at the end of history, but to calm believers who had been shaken by false reports, fearing that the “day of Christ” had already arrived. When Paul speaks of the coming of Christ and our being gathered to Him, Paul anchors their hearts in Christ, assuring believers need not be troubled or deceived, for nothing has overturned the reign of Christ. The tragic irony is that what Paul gave to steady anxious saints has been turned into a launchpad for elaborate antichrist systems. Where Paul anchors the church in Christ, interpreters have shifted the spotlight to a phantom ruler the scriptures never name.

Scripture continues, “let no man deceive you by any means, for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?” I Thessalonians 2:3-5. What was meant to calm trembling hearts has become fuel for centuries of prophetic frenzy. These verses, designed to anchor the church in Christ, have been twisted into the unveiling of a rival savior. Thus the gaze shifts, not to the risen Christ, but to the “man of sin,” paraded as if he were the true centerpiece of redemptive history. Paul’s warning is straightforward, do not be deceived. The “falling away” and the revealing of the “man of sin” were not given as puzzle pieces for a prophetic chart, but as immediate encouragement to the Thessalonians. They feared the day of Christ had already arrived, but Paul assures them it had not. These signs were not far-off curiosities but realities tied to their own time, preparing them for persecution and pointing them back to the sufficiency of Christ’s reign.

We must remember the context. The Thessalonians were suffering under real opposition, and Paul’s words were meant to steady them in that storm. “The man of sin” is described in terms that fit the arrogance of earthly powers, opposing God, exalting self, sitting in the temple of God as if divine. Rome itself, with its emperors demanding worship, fits this description far more naturally than a yet-to-appear super villain thousands of years later. Paul is equipping them to see through blasphemous claims of power in their own day, not scripting a drama for ours. His concern is to keep the church from being shaken, to remind them that Christ reigns, and that no pretender, whether emperor, priest, or false prophet, can rival His throne. Christ’s kingdom is unshakable, and His victory already secured.

The imagery of one “sitting in the temple of God” would have struck Paul’s hearers with immediate relevance. For them it was not a puzzle piece for the distant end, but a vivid reminder that earthly rulers will always attempt to usurp divine honor. The emperors did so openly; religious leaders did so more subtly, yet both alike were doomed pretenders, for Christ alone sits enthroned. Paul’s description of the “man of sin” was never meant to make believers quake, but to sharpen their discernment. In a world, (much like our own,) where emperors crowned themselves divine and priests corrupted the worship of God, the temptation was to believe that such arrogance might overthrow the kingdom of Christ. But Paul exposes it for what it is, a counterfeit throne, a borrowed power, a fleeting boast. The church needed reminding that while men parade as gods, only ONE has been exalted to the right hand of the Father. “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:9-11. And so Paul’s words, far from feeding speculation, call believers to rest in the unshakable triumph of Christ. The “man of sin” rises and falls in every generation, as do all those that usurp the gospel of Christ, but the gospel remains, the kingdom advances, and every tongue will one day “confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:11.

In conclusion, the oversized, future antichrist that dominates modern prophecy is not biblical. The Bible identifies antichrist as the beast, the man of sin, and the many who deny Christ, already present, already active. So let every scheme be tested and every assumption silenced before the word of God. Our only stability is Scripture, and Scripture enthrones the risen Christ. Christ has triumphed, Christ now reigns, and His dominion is everlasting. “Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end.” Isaiah 9:7. Antichrist is a mindset, a false gospel in disguise, a perversion of truth that obscures Christ and scorns His finished salvation. Let us hold fast to the Word, bending our thoughts beneath its authority until all glory rests on Christ alone. “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” John 17:17. MPJ

Gospel Fruit: Some follow-up thoughts to my previous post. Speaking to the disciples, Christ warned of those who outwardly appear pious but inwardly are enemies of the truth, concluding with the words, “wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” Matthew 7:20. Too often this verse is twisted into measuring a man by outward appearance or moral performance. But Christ Himself explains what the “fruit” is, it is doctrine. In this context nothing more and nothing less. The dividing line is the gospel itself, good fruit is the doctrine of Christ; bad fruit is the doctrine that denies Him. “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” II John 9. This is why He warned His disciples, “take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.” Matthew 16:6. Their minds at first ran to loaves and provisions, yet Christ’s point became clear, “then understood they how that He bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.” Matthew 16:12. Their fruit was their doctrine, and it was poison. To depart from the doctrine of Christ is to depart from Christ Himself. As it is written, “whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” II John 9. The line of fidelity to Christ is drawn in the truth of His gospel, and nowhere else. To abide in the doctrine of Christ is to have both the Father and the Son; to depart from it, no matter how devout the exterior, is to be without God. John 8:31. MPJ

Truth Matters: The other day, shortly after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, I had some personal correspondence with a friend. In passing, I remarked that, whatever the reason, the LORD had removed him, for his work was done. This simple observation was somehow taken to mean that I was declaring Charlie Kirk a true believer in Christ. For this I was reprimanded, though in truth I had never even heard of Kirk until the day he was cut down by an assassin. My words carried no judgment of his eternal state, but rather a sober recognition that life and death are determined by God alone. “So Saul died for his transgression which he committed against the LORD… therefore he slew him, and turned the kingdom unto David the son of Jesse.” I Chronicles 10:13-14. The testimony of Saul’s end reminds us that men do not perish by chance, nor do they outlive the purpose of God. Saul's work was done; his death came at the very moment decreed, for reasons the Lord Himself had appointed. Whether in mercy or in judgment, God numbers our days, fixes the bounds of our habitation, and removes us in His time. To acknowledge this is not to make pronouncements about a man’s ultimate destiny, but to confess the absolute sovereignty of God over life and death. Every life begins and ends at the Lord’s appointment, and no one departs this world a moment sooner or later than God has decreed! Job 14:5. Kings, rulers, and common men alike rise and fall by His decree. Saying a man’s course is complete is not to canonize him, nor to romanize him after the fashion of papal sainthood, but to simply acknowledge the sovereignty of God in these matters of life and death. “The LORD killeth, and maketh alive, he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.” I Samuel 2:6.

Additionally, and in harmony with these thoughts, I would add that our place in this world is not to enthrone ourselves as judges of who is saved and who is lost. That tribunal belongs to Christ alone, Romans 14:4, before whom every knee shall bow and every tongue confess. Our calling is of a different order, to discern truth from error by the light of God’s Word, to confess the name of Christ without wavering, and to hold fast the gospel entrusted to us. I Timothy 1:11. When all is said and done, the only distinction between those that “are of God,” and those that are “of the world,” I John 4:5-6, is mercy and grace alone. Not wisdom, not resolve, not conviction, but simply “the grace of God, and the gift by grace,” which is by Jesus Christ. Romans 5:15. “By the grace of God I am what I am.” I Corinthians 15:10.

As I have been affirming, we are not the arbiters of men’s eternal condition. That prerogative belongs to the Lord alone, who searches the reins and the heart, Jeremiah 17:10; yet at the same time, Scripture commands us to contend earnestly for the faith, Jude 3, to test the spirits whether they are of God, I John 4:1, and to separate light from darkness. This is not optional; it belongs to our allegiance to Christ, Matthew 12:30, and is nothing that we can treat lightly. To love Christ is to love His truth, and to love His truth is to stand unflinchingly for it. John 8:31. So yes, please excuse us, if we seem a little too intense or overly passionate about that which is more precious to us than life itself, Matthew 10:39, the truth of Christ’s person and work. If these words fail, then our whole hope collapses. I Corinthians 15:19. Likewise, please forgive us if we cannot treat the blood of Christ with contempt, whether by denying its power, or by shrugging at it as though it were just some bible concept, and what we believe or understand about it, doesn't really matter. Hebrews 10:29. Additionally, pardon us if we cannot speak of the gospel as though it were one option among many, like choosing a brand of coffee or a political platform, as if eternal truth were a matter of preference. Do not be surprised if we appear a little narrow-minded when it comes to Christ, or a bit unyielding when it comes to His glory. “For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me.” John 17:8.

This presses upon us a sobering consideration, can we truly divide a man from his teaching? The answer is no, it’s impossible. A man’s words reveal his heart, just as fruit reveals the tree, for out of “the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh,” Matthew 12:33-34, and the fruit cannot be split from the tree that bears it. “Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.” Matthew 7:17-18. For this reason the apostles not only warned against false ideas but also identified those who spread them. Paul cautioned the church to mark those who cause divisions contrary to the doctrine they had learned, Romans 16:17; John wrote plainly, “if there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed.” II John 10. Such warnings show us that the man and his message stand together. To fellowship with one is to lend credibility to the other. And although we are not apostles, nor pretend to be, yet loyalty to Christ demands faithfulness to his words.

The apostles never shied away from naming those who denied the faith. Paul spoke of Hymenaeus and Alexander who had made shipwreck, I Timothy 1:19-20, and of Hymenaeus and Philetus whose false teaching was eating like a canker, II Timothy 2:16-18. John exposed Diotrephes for his pride and malicious words. III John 9-10. Faithfulness to Christ demands that we expose false apostles and deceitful workers, warning the flock of ravening wolves, whatever the cost, Romans 16:17; for when the gospel is corrupted or distorted, silence is betrayal, and to embrace those who deny Christ is to partake of this “evil deed,” II John 10-11, yet the Lord Himself will render the final verdict, for all authority is His alone. Our part is not to seize His throne, but to remain faithful to His truth, confessing His name without compromise, whatever the cost. MPJ

Postscript: I couldn’t help but notice that his portrait has been sitting on the front page of SermonAudio ever since his assassination. That, to me, is a tragic irony. Here’s a platform that claims to uphold “historic Christianity,” yet it highlights a man whose public voice showed little to no grasp of the gospel of Christ. With so many Calvinists backing that site, you’d think there would be greater discernment. But perhaps this only shows how easily even those who pride themselves on doctrinal precision can drift from the heart of the gospel when Christ Himself is not the measure. The world treats truth as negotiable, but the gospel is life or death. Truth does matter, it is life and death, heaven and hell, Christ or nothing. We do not consign men to hell, but neither can we separate them from their words. Error must be named, truth confessed, and Christ exalted. To tolerate lies in the name of charity is not love but treason against Christ.

Greater Love: “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.” John 15:13-14. Last night, while reading John 15 together with my wife, I came to verse 13, already knowing what was before me, and anticipating one of the most extraordinary sayings of our Lord, words that almost take your breath away. “Ye are my friends.” Can this truly be so? Especially when weighed against the reality of our own vileness and insignificance. I mean, I’ve got to be the worst friend ever! How often do I harden my heart, wander after foolish desires, indulge the flesh, fail to pray, break my promises, complain or murmur under difficult circumstances, &c. By any measure of loyalty or steadiness, I’d be the worst of friends, disloyal, distracted, doubting, questioning the Lord’s goodness and circling back to the very sins I promised to forsake. Honestly, when I start to list out the ways someone can be a poor friend, the examples just keep piling up, and, to my shame, I see myself in almost every one of them; and yet, this is precisely the wonder of it all.

Many of us know what it is to feel alone or friendless. Even in this age of endless connections, where social media boasts of “friends” beyond number, real life often reminds us that true companionship is rare, sometimes found only within our own household, and perhaps not necessarily there either. Matthew 10:36. And so when we hear of Christ speaking in terms of such infinite condescension, “ye are my friends.” What greater astonishment could there be? Such a thought leaves the soul speechless. That Christ, who lacks nothing and overflows with infinite blessedness, who knows all that I am and all that I am not, would call me His friend? “Not that we loved Him, but that He loved us,” comes to mind. I John 4:10. That Christ would ever say this of me, the worst friend imaginable, is staggering. To common sense it seems absurd; and apart from faith impossible to even begin to embrace as applying to ourselves. How could ONE so pure, so faithful, so infinitely blessed, ever call us His friend? Our constant failures rise up as witnesses against us, and honesty and reason tells us to cast such thoughts immediately aside. But we can't! We are captivated and mesmerized by “the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 8:39.

We want this more than anything! Such love leaves us in awe, and we treasure it as life’s greatest pearl. Matthew 13:46. Yet the more we prize it, the more keenly we feel our weakness, realizing how poor a friend we have been to Christ. The LORD alone can give grace to look beyond our unfaithfulness and to cling to the staggering truth that Christ’s word is more certain than all our trembling apprehensions about our failures as His friends. “If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful, he cannot deny himself.” II Timothy 2:13.

Then comes a word from Christ that can leave one staggering, as though His friendship were secured only by perfect obedience, when he continues, “if ye do whatsoever I command you.” That little word “if” almost seems to spoil everything. For how can such a thing be? We know our bent to sin, our weakness in obedience. How can the Lord, who knows our inability, require a life of perfect conformity? In one sense, the promise of being Christ’s friend seems dashed to pieces under the weight of such an impossible condition. Who can claim such perfect obedience? As above, the more we look within, the more we see failure upon failure, commands neglected, affections misplaced, duties half-heartedly performed, sins repeated again and again. The very verse that should confirm Christ's friendship instead seems to expose our unworthiness all the more, as our peace slips away, common sense argues, and a voice whispers, “could Christ truly mean me when He speaks these words?”

The “if” in Christ’s words is not the language of condition, nor a hurdle we must clear to earn His love; but I believe one of evidence, even ownership; for when the Lord says, “ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you,” we can be assured from the analogy of scripture that Christ is not laying down a bargain, as though obedience were the price we pay to purchase His friendship. The whole testimony of Scripture assures us that His love is not bartered but freely given. Isaiah 55:1. Rather, I think, these words echo the evidence of friendship already established by grace, depicting the life of those that are in Christ, as being identified with the words of Christ. In the light of Christ crucified, every act of following after Him becomes the echo of His love already set upon us, and the evidence that we abide in the One who first laid down His life for His friends. And yes, that fruit is imperfect, often mingled with failure and sin; stumbling along the way, sometimes grievously, but, in mercy, the direction of their heart is Christward, for “the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus” their Lord, has fixated them there.

I think in one very real sense, Peter’s words to Christ are the anthem of every faltering friend. After his bitter fall and the grief of denying his friend, he never really ceased to love Christ, and from that broken place could only say, “Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee.” John 21:17. In these words we hear the voice of faltering friends whose hearts are Christward, not for the constancy of their love, but for the constancy of His love that turned them to Himself. And so we circle back to those breathtaking words of Christ, “ye are my friends.” What began in wonder, ends in wonder still, not only in these words of infinite condescension, but in all of life. “Not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” I John 4:10. The Lord is ever mindful of his friends and surrounds himself with those that love him. Malachi 3:17. MPJ

Alongside the study of Scripture, I also enjoy researching history, especially British Parliamentarian and Reformation history, and have spent countless hours exploring those fields in particular. My interest also extends to early American history and the way our country was deeply influenced by scripture, dissenting faith, and the pursuit of liberty of conscience. Yet I have often noted that the Pilgrims did not come purely as champions of religious liberty in the modern sense. Many of them were driven not because they wished to extend freedom of conscience to all, but because they were losing the power to enforce their own religious authority in the old country. Ironically, in fleeing persecution, they sought a new land where they themselves could establish rigid boundaries, enforce conformity, and demand allegiance to their particular interpretation of Scripture.

In this way, the very impulse that led them across the sea was bound up with a sectarian rigidity that quickly turned to the persecution of those who differed, and none felt this more sharply than the Baptists. Though they too sought to live according to conscience and scripture, they became the targets of fines, banishment, and even imprisonment at the hands of those who themselves had fled persecution. The irony is striking, men who had once suffered under the heavy hand of religious conformity became, in the New World, enforcers of their own. This contradiction reminds us how easily the pursuit of liberty can be corrupted when men cling not to Christ, but to their own authority to rule in His name.

What brought this to mind were some words I recently came across from John Robinson, 1576-1625, the pastor of the English Separatists who later became known as the Pilgrims. Robinson’s congregation had settled in Leiden, Holland, in 1609, after fleeing persecution in England. By 1620, part of that congregation resolved to emigrate to the New World. Before their departure, Robinson preached his famous farewell sermon to those preparing to sail on the Speedwell (later transferring to the Mayflower) and eventually establish the Plymouth Colony. Robinson himself remained in Leiden with the larger portion of the congregation, intending to follow later, but he never did. Robinson’s farewell sermon to the Pilgrims contains a striking warning, one that feels as relevant now as then, a sober reminder to honor the past without idolizing it, and to look beyond men’s writings to the Scriptures themselves, where the light of Christ never grows dim. “For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” II Corinthians 4:6.

These are Robinson’s words, “the Lutherans cannot be drawn beyond what Luther saw; the Calvinists, they stick where Calvin left them. This is a misery much to be lamented; for though they were shining lights in their times, yet God did not reveal His whole will unto them, and if they were alive today they would be as ready to and willing to embrace further light, as that they had received.” (John Robinson Farewell Sermon 1620.)

Robinson’s warning exposes a danger as real in our day as in his, the tendency to rest in the discoveries of our “fathers” rather than pressing on in the light of Christ. This danger is not confined to the followers of Luther or Calvin, but repeats itself in every age, men fastening themselves to teachers, hardening into systems, and neglecting the truth that only Christ is the Light. Just this past week, as I was driving home from work, I tuned in to a sermon audio feed from a local Protestant Reformed congregation. They were live-streaming what appeared to be an examination of a candidate for the ministry, essentially a public question-and-answer session. At first I had some difficulty following, not being familiar with their procedures, but it soon became clear that this young man, likely one of their theological students, was being carefully examined on matters of scripture and doctrine, and was expected to respond in harmony with their particular brand of Reformed Christianity. What struck me most was that, in sorting through their questions, he often leaned not on Scripture but on memorized lines from their confession and catechism, as though preparing for the pulpit required little more than passing a theological entrance exam.

These confessional forms, though originally intended as expressions of belief, have in practice become the framework upon which entire traditions prop up their doctrinal systems. It is not only the “reformed” who do this, but anybody that leans upon the writings of men, be it catechisms, councils, or creeds, as though they carried equal weight with Scripture itself. What was once a guide becomes the rule, and the Word of God is treated as commentary on man’s commentary. Here we see how easily reverence for tradition slips into reliance upon it. What begins as a safeguard for truth soon becomes a substitute for Scripture, and the very spirit Robinson lamented in his day takes root again, men halting where their fathers halted, instead of pressing on in the light of Christ, a light too often obscured beneath the shadow of human systems.

History shows how quickly movements harden into monuments of their founders. The Lutheran clings to Luther, the Calvinist to Calvin, the Puritan to Owen, the Baptist to Gill, the Methodist to Wesley, &c. In honoring men, their followers risk fossilizing partial glimpses of truth into rigid systems. But Christ’s riches cannot be confined to any one man. The Scriptures are ever-living, and the Spirit continues to unfold Christ to His people. John 16:14. God did not reveal the fullness of His counsel to Luther or Calvin, however brilliant their witness. Their strength was not in completing any given task, but in walking obediently in the light they were given. If they were alive today, Robinson hinted that they would be as quick to grasp fresh light as they were to embrace what was first revealed. It is a grave mistake when believers stop where their teachers stopped, as if the truth revealed to one man were the sum of all God’s counsel. The brightest lights of former days were only servants of Christ who walked faithfully in the measure of light given them. Their faithfulness was not in exhausting truth, but in following Christ as far as they were led. To turn their discoveries into a finished system is to betray the very example they set, and when their authority is appealed to in matters of faith and practice in place of Scripture, it can become a subtle contradiction of the very faith once delivered to the saints. May we be reminded that the Word of God is an inexhaustible treasury; and though we are grateful for the portion given to those before us, may the Lord lift our eyes to the greater light still shining in Scripture, where Christ is revealed in His inexhaustible glory. John 5:39.

In rereading the above, I should note that I am not speaking against confessions themselves, but only against giving them preeminence. Confessions of faith do serve a purpose. After all, anyone can claim, “the Bible is my creed,” but such a statement can mean almost anything. A confession at least attempts to summarize what a body of believers understands the Scriptures to teach, offering clarity and guardrails where vague appeals to Scripture often fail. At their best, they can help distinguish truth from error and remind us where the “church” has stood in the past; yet they must never be treated as equal to the Word of God, for their value lies only in how faithfully they reflect the Scriptures, not in standing beside them as a final authority. MPJ

An eye for an eye: In the Sermon on the Mount, Christ is teaching against a personal spirit of retaliation. The “eye for an eye” principle was a judicial standard meant for magistrates, not for personal vengeance, or for individuals to settle personal grudges. But people had twisted it into an excuse for personal revenge. His disciples are not to respond to personal insults, injuries, or injustices with the same spirit of retaliation. Instead, they are to reflect the meekness and patience of their Master. Turning the other cheek is not passivity in the face of lawlessness, but the refusal to repay evil with evil. Romans 12:17-21. To “turn the other cheek” does not mean to approve of sin or to ignore injustice; it means that the Christian refuses to repay evil with evil, leaving vengeance to God, and bearing wrongs in a way that displays the Spirit of Christ.

What brought these words of Christ to mind was Paul’s response in Acts 23, where he rebuked Ananias as a “whited wall.” At first hearing, it almost sounds like a contradiction of our Lord’s teaching on the mount, yet looking closer, Paul was not lashing out in violence or seeking personal revenge, he was exposing hypocrisy and unlawful conduct in the midst of a judicial setting. His words echo the prophets, Ezekiel 13:10-12, who likewise rebuked leaders who pretended holiness while corrupting the way of the Lord. Matthew 23:27. Paul is appealing to the very law that Ananias claimed to uphold, showing that the priest had acted unjustly by ordering him struck contrary to the law. Paul wasn’t defending personal pride or reputation, but calling out injustice in God’s name. When Christ Himself was smitten, John 18:22-23, He didn’t literally “turn the other cheek” in silence either, but firmly said, “if I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil, but if well, why smitest thou me?” That’s almost the exact stance Paul takes. Christ set the pattern of patient boldness, not silent acquiescence to injustice, showing us how to bear wrongs without revenge and to overcome evil not with retaliation but with truth and grace. The key is to discern the difference between lashing out in anger and bearing witness to the truth, between repaying evil with evil and exposing evil by the light of Scripture, while remaining steadfast in that truth.

Matthew 5 cannot be understood as canceling justice or diminishing the law of God, but as redirecting our gaze from personal retaliation to God’s justice fulfilled in Christ. The principle of “eye for an eye” was not repealed but eternally satisfied in His death. If that standard were set aside, the cross would be unnecessary, even meaningless. But because God’s justice cannot be brushed away, Christ bore its full weight. Thus Matthew 5 does not weaken the law or soften justice, it magnifies grace by showing that justice is satisfied only in Christ. At the cross He endured the exact measure of wrath that sin required, without reduction or escape, so that the law’s righteous standard might be met once for all. His death was not symbolic but substitutionary, the principle of “eye for eye, tooth for tooth” carried out in full, as Christ perfectly and finally satisfied the law’s demand for all whom He came to redeem. Outside of Him, the same justice falls on the sinner without mercy; in Him, it is already satisfied. Romans 8:1-4.

And what about the verses that follow? “And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.” Matthew 5:40-43. To most of us these words seem far too demanding, almost beyond reach, as if Christ were setting an impossible standard, especially as they strike against our natural instinct to protect ourselves, our rights, and our possessions. Yet that is exactly the point. In ourselves we recoil at such commands, for they expose the selfishness and pride that lies at the core of our corrupt nature. They strip away every excuse and fix our hope on Christ, who embodies this life in fullness and counts it as ours before God. These words feel impossible because they are. They reveal not our strength but our frailty and sin, so that the gospel may stand forth as our only hope in Christ.

Additionally, I believe that the commands about the cloak, the second mile, and the generous hand are not new burdens for the flesh to carry, but gospel realities that display how grace reorients our thinking and living, anchoring us in Christ, who is made unto us wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption. These words are not impossibilities for us to achieve, but glimpses of the life formed by the gospel, the life of those who have received mercy, and who now, by that mercy, walk in a way that testifies of the love of Christ. So these words are not a checklist of duties, but a revelation of how grace renovates our life in Christ. They strip away self-reliance, expose the futility of clinging to possessions or rights, and bear witness to a life preserved by the grace of Christ. Jude 1. MPJ

Public Education: Our children are the most important trust the LORD has placed in our hands, and it is vital that we honor that sacred responsibility in every area of their lives. Few decisions weigh more heavily than where they will receive instruction, for every day their hearts and minds are being shaped by what they are taught. To suppose that public schools are “neutral” is a deadly delusion, for within those walls the wisdom of man is enthroned, and the Word of God is cast aside. And if we even toy with the idea of surrendering our children to the state for their education, what does that reveal about our so-called “faith”? Do we actually believe the gospel we profess, or are we content to let Caesar disciple our sons and daughters in the creed of unbelief?

How can we say we are nurturing them in the fear of the Lord while deliberately placing them under instructors that hate Christ, and who have no regard for the Scriptures. Such who use their position to mock the gospel and normalize sin, as they seek to replace God’s Word with the wicked philosophies of men? Such a duplicity is contrary to the faith, and borders on hypocrisy, as its bitter fruit is seen in the countless children who grow up to despise the Christ their parents only honored with their lips.

When the children of Israel learned the ways of the Canaanites, they quickly bowed to their gods. Judges 3:5-7. The psalmist laments that they were “mingled among the heathen, and learned their works.” Psalm 106:35. The Lord had warned them, “for they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods, so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.” Deuteronomy 7:4. The lesson seems unmistakable, immerse children in the world’s system, and most will bow to its idols and embrace its values, trading the truth of God for the lies of the age. Why then should we expect a different outcome when our own sons and daughters are daily catechized in a system that exalts man and excludes Christ?

Again, let me emphasize this undeniable fact that public schools are not neutral ground. They are temples of secular humanism, catechizing the next generation in the religion of the state. When Christian parents place their children under such instruction, they are not merely “educating” them; they are delivering them to the very enemy of Christ. Is it then any wonder that multitudes grow up fluent in the world’s language, captivated by its spirit, and hardened against the truth of God? The daily lessons, pledges, and celebrations all reinforce the creed of secular humanism. Man is autonomous, truth is relative, morality is self-defined, and God is irrelevant.

Step into the modern classroom with eyes open, and it becomes unmistakably clear that education has been replaced with secular indoctrination. Children are no longer simply taught skills; they are trained to think, act, and believe according to the dictates of secular humanism. Parents are cast as threats, while children are treated as wards of the state, to be molded and shielded from the “harmful” influence of their parents’ convictions. The outcome is tragically predictable, young men and women shaped by the world’s philosophy, who see little need for Christ and willingly exchange the truth of God for the lies of the age.

One of the most common objections raised against homeschooling is the supposed need for children to be “socialized.” Socialized into what? Socialized to think, talk, and act like the rest of the world? To absorb its corrupt values, chase its idols, and normalize its sins? If success is measured by how well a child can blend into a culture that rejects Christ, then public schools stand second to none in turning out model citizens of unbelief. Children are trained to think as the world thinks, to prize what the world prizes, and to scoff at what God declares is good. To send children into the public school system in order that they might “fit in” is to desire for them the very thing Scripture warns against. Romans 12:2. What good is it to be “socialized” if in the process their souls are secularized?

Consider how directly opposed to Christ the world’s teachings are, yet these are fed daily to children in the classroom. They no longer teach you how to think, but what to think. At one time they were devoted to the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic, but now they have become centers of indoctrination, essentially catechizing children according to the spirit of the age. Transgender ideology is pushed with militant zeal, evolutionary myths are paraded about as unquestionable truth, and sex education, stripped of purity and holiness, normalizes fornication, redefines marriage, and celebrates what God condemns throughout the Scriptures. This is not unbiased or harmless learning but wholesale indoctrination in a worldview crafted in defiance of the living God. The result is the systematic training of children to despise Christ, to scoff at His Word, and to embrace the very lies that lead to destruction.

Even reading, writing, and arithmetic, though in their place important, in light of eternity fade into nothing. What matters is not whether Johnny can read, but whether his name is found in the Lamb’s Book of Life. Revelation 20:15. That sobering reality should outweigh every earthly concern. Believers are told to raise their children “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord,” Ephesians 6:4, and how can this be accomplished by sending them away to be tutored in unbelief? How can we fulfill God’s command while placing them daily under those who deny His Word and scorn His Son?

Hear the clarity of Scripture in Ezra’s rebuke, words that speak as powerfully to us today as they did then. “And now, O our God, what shall we say after this, for we have forsaken thy commandments which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, the land, unto which ye go to possess it, is an unclean land with the filthiness of the people of the lands, with their abominations, which have filled it from one end to another with their uncleanness. Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth forever.”

In closing, I am not suggesting that every parent who sends their children to public schools does so out of a lack of love or care for them. Far from it, most do so with the very best of intentions. But what I am urging is that we weigh our choices in the light of God’s Word. Love must be governed by truth. The real question is whether our decisions as parents spring from Scripture or from mere convenience, from eternal priorities or temporal comforts. Surely, we all want the best for our children, but here is the searching issue, what do we count as ‘best’? Do our priorities mirror the fleeting concerns of the world, or do they spring from the eternal truth of God? The question is not whether we love our children, but whether we love them enough to lead them in the way of Christ, with Scripture as their guide. MPJ

“Maschil of David; A Prayer when he was in the cave. I cried unto the LORD with my voice; with my voice unto the LORD did I make my supplication.” Psalms 142:1. Consider this, that one of the psalms that comforts weary saints was first composed in the depths of a cave. David looked beyond the cave to the God of mercy, and with confidence declared that the Lord would yet “deal bountifully” with him, verse 7. What a testimony, when everything outwardly pressed him down, he still expected only goodness from the hand of God. Outwardly, David was a fugitive; inwardly, he was a worshiper. Psalm 34:1. In the company of many who were distressed like himself, David’s spirit still felt overwhelmed; yet in that place his confidence was that the Lord knew his path. Not only did the Lord know his way in general, but He knew David’s path in particular, every turn, every hiding place, every breath of fear. And more than this, the LORD sustained that path particularly, upholding His servant step by step until the day of deliverance.

The same God that David called out to whilst overcome with untold sorrows is the same Lord God whom we may now approach in Christ, our great High Priest; and through His unchanging priesthood, our access is secure. His priesthood does not waver with our weakness nor expire with time. Hebrews 7:24-25. Where David found refuge in shadows, we come by a new and living way, where grace and mercy are ever open to us in Christ Jesus, and through His unchanging priesthood, our access is secure, for the same High Priest who opened the way for His people as a body also remembers each one by name; even as the high priest of old wore the names of Israel upon his breastplate, so Christ remembers His own, one by one, in the presence of God. The hidden burdens we carry, the sighs too faint for others to notice, the silent fears, and the needs never spoken, &c., are all remembered by Christ in His intercession before the Father. “He calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.” John 10:3. His priesthood is not a blanket covering alone, but a personal intercession that regards every child with particular remembrance and unfailing love. “Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands; thy walls are continually before me.” Isaiah 49:16. MPJ

“Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Ephesians 5:20. In recent months, my wife and I have found ourselves noticing the strange absence of gratitude in daily life. More than once we have given something unexpected, even substantial by our modest means, only to find it entirely unacknowledged. Two of these were wedding gifts for ceremonies to which we were not even invited, gifts given freely, yet never so much as acknowledged. And as we spoke about this last night, we realized there were half a dozen other instances in just the past month where kindness seemed to vanish into silence. Even one of our daughters left us puzzled, as my wife had to reach out three different times just to confirm whether something we had mailed to her ever arrived, especially since we had already been billed for it. We were not looking for recognition or trying to display our kindness, yet it still amazed us to see how widespread unthankfulness has become. The smallest expression of gratitude, a word of thanks, is strangely missing in so many places?

And yet, when I pause, I am reminded that this same spirit of ingratitude is found in us all by nature. What we criticize in others is but a shadow of ourselves, for if their silence is painful, how much more does our own neglect of gratitude toward God reveal the unthankfulness of our own hearts, and how much more should that ingratitude lead us to marvel at the grace that covers even this sin. Micah 7:18. Our voices fail and our minds stray; we can't even begin to render to the Lord the glory due unto His name, nor give Him true thanks, except through Christ who stands in our place. “For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.” Ephesians 2:18. Here is the glory of the gospel, our unthankfulness has been met with Christ’s perfect gratitude. Where we have failed to honor the Giver, Christ honored Him in all things. Romans 5:19. Where we have received mercies without acknowledgment, Christ blessed His Father for daily bread, Matthew 15:36, for answered prayer, John 11:41, for the gracious unveiling of divine truth, Luke 10:21, even for the cup of suffering placed before Him. Matthew 26:27-28. Our silence is answered by His thanksgiving; our neglect is upheld by His faithful intercession. And if this is true even in our thanklessness, how much more in every aspect of our lives, where Christ’s mediatorial work stands as our only sufficiency. Hebrews 9:24. MPJ

Brook Cedron: When David fled Jerusalem because of Absalom’s rebellion, the text says, “and all the country wept with a loud voice, and all the people passed over, the king also himself passed over the brook Kidron, and all the people passed over, toward the way of the wilderness.” II Samuel 15:23. It is there that he apparently wrote Psalm 3 and Psalm 41. Not only had his own son Absalom betrayed him, but so had his closest advisor Ahithophel, who like Judas Iscariot, hung himself when his conspiracy crumbled. II Samuel 17:23.

The brook Cedron, or Kidron, was a narrow channel of water running through a dark valley just outside Jerusalem, at the base of the Mount of Olives, east of the city. Its waters were blackened by the blood and refuse from the temple sacrifices, carried by a conduit down from the altar. What defiled the sanctuary was poured into this stream, so that its very name, Kidron, meaning black or murky, spoke of uncleanness. John Gill even mentioned that local farmers would purchase the soil and sediment of its waters to dung their fields. Gill went further than the mere historical detail, seeing in this brook a spiritual emblem. To him it pictured the world itself, its pollution, its darkness, its griefs and burdens, all lying between the believer and the heavenly Zion.

For David, the Lord’s anointed, to depart Jerusalem in tears and cross that brook was a striking picture of deep humiliation. It shows us the bitter fruit of sin, though forgiven, David’s past transgressions brought sorrow into his own house, and here he bears the weight of God’s chastening hand. Psalm 38:3-4. In the Book of I Kings, we learn how Asa, King of Judah, after taking away the sodomites out of the land, (either by driving them out of the land, or by putting them to death according to the law of God, Lev 20:13,) dethroned his own mother for her idolatry, and the idolatrous image she had set up he destroyed, reducing it to ashes by the Brook Kidron. I Kings 15:13. Thus, the brook itself becomes linked with sin and idolatry, its dark waters often receiving the ashes of false gods and the tokens of man’s rebellion against the Lord.

Approximately 900 years later another King crossed that same brook. On the night of His arrest, Jesus “went out with His disciples over the Brook Kidron, where there was a garden.” John 18:1. Through this brook the Lord Jesus passed on the night of His betrayal. And if this black torrent represented the defilement of sin, then how fitting that Christ, bearing the iniquities of His people, should tread its banks with such heaviness of soul. Psalm 110:7, speaks of Messiah drinking “of the brook in the way,” and here the shadow becomes substance. What David once knew in sorrow when he crossed the brook, fleeing from Absalom, Christ knew in fullness as the greater Son of David. Matthew 21:9. David passed over as an exile; Christ passed over as the willing Surety. David bore his shame; Christ bore our sin. MPJ

A hopeless endeavor: “For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.” Romans 10:3. From the beginning of the world, man has never ceased to labor with his own wisdom to span the impassable gulf that sin has fixed between himself and God. Luke 16:26. The philosopher imagines reason will do the trick; the moralist clings to his virtues; the religionist multiplies ceremonies and traditions. All alike engaged in the same hopeless task.

And although their methods differ, they share one ruinous feature that every human scheme to reach God has in common which is to deflate God's holiness and inflate man’s worth. The holiness of God must be softened, the corruption of man must be excused, until at last the two might appear capable of meeting somewhere in the middle. “Thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself, but I will reprove thee, and set them in order before thine eyes.” Psalm 50:21. The gospel exposes this as both blasphemy and folly. God cannot be lowered, nor man exalted, without destroying truth itself. To diminish divine holiness is to deny God; to flatter human dignity is to deny sin. No bridge built on such lies will ever stand. Job 8:13-15.

The gospel moves in an altogether different direction. It does not call men to scale heaven by their own efforts, nor does it reduce the Almighty to a mere collaborator in man’s redemption. Such corruption reshapes “salvation” into a bargain struck between God and man, making the sinner appear as a partner rather than a condemned malefactor. This is to overturn the very nature of grace, for grace ceases to be grace the moment it is mingled with works. Romans 11:6. The sinner is not God’s associate in redemption, but a guilty wretch for whom the ransom was paid. The gospel declares that God Himself has come down in Christ, not to meet man in the middle, but to stoop to him in the very depths of his ruin. Anything less is not gospel but fraud, dressing human pride in the garments of religion. At the cross we behold holiness upheld, justice answered, mercy exalted, and salvation poured out as a free gift of grace. Where every human scheme collapses, the work of Christ triumphs. Here “reconciliation” is not manufactured but accomplished, by grace alone, in Christ alone. MPJ

Nimrod: “And Cush begat Nimrod, he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; wherefore it is said, even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.” Genesis 10:8-10. It is striking how suddenly Nimrod appears in the scriptures. Without warning, he bursts from the genealogy as the first prominent “mighty one in the earth” after the flood, as a figurehead of human strength and ambition, the embodiment of man’s attempt to carve out greatness apart from God. Scripture records that Nimrod “was a mighty hunter before the LORD,” indeed, the mighty one in the earth. His name itself means “rebel,” and the Hebrew text paints him as insolent and tyrannical. The phrase “before the LORD” I am told suggests bold defiance, as when sin filled the earth “before God” in the days of Noah, Genesis 6:11, or it may mean simply in the open sight of God. For “neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight, but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.” Hebrews 4:13. 

What was birthed in Nimrod’s kingdom of Shinar has reverberated through the ages, it reappears wherever religion cloaks pride with piety, wherever man enthrones himself while invoking the name of God. It is the worship of man, dressed up as the worship of God. Rome did not invent it; she only perfected the art of cloaking paganism with christian language, enthroning priestcraft in the place of Christ. Jeremiah 51:7. Its mission is clear, the deification of man, the rejection of God, and the use of political and religious tyranny to enslave. Revelation 13:7-8.

The Reformation brought a great breaking forth of light, yet even there Babylon left its trace. Many were indeed delivered from Rome’s tyranny, yet in place of one great tower, they built many smaller ones, repeating Babel’s confusion under Protestant names. Creeds and confessions, useful as they may be, soon became walls and fortresses to divide. Denominations multiplied, each one claiming the higher ground, each one laying brick upon brick until Protestantism itself became a patchwork of towers, Babel rebuilt, not in stone but in systems of men. Matthew 15:9. Every “new boss” is the same as the old boss. What Nimrod sought by conquest, religion achieves by tradition, and enforces by creed. Thus, Nimrod becomes more than an ancient name. He is a type of every ruler, nation, or movement that exalts human might and unity against the throne of Christ. Men may join hands, build towers, and rally kingdoms, but the word of God is sure. “The LORD came down.” Genesis 11:5. Every Babel must fall. Every Nimrod will perish. The kingdoms of this world are doomed to crumble, that the kingdom of our Lord and of His Christ might stand forever. Revelation 11:15. Nimrod reminds us that every rival power is temporary, but Christ’s dominion is everlasting. MPJ

Is the Gospel Clear? Referencing my last post, where mention is made of being resolute in the gospel declaration, a friend remarked with the following reply, (a thought that I suspect all of us wrestle with,) “it all depends upon how deep one is made to go down the rabbit hole. If one would be resolute, one can never to himself rule out the possibility of being deluded.” I began to think about this on the way home from work today, and will share some thoughts.

Believers are naturally wary in this matter, fearing the danger of presumption more than anything else. Experience has taught them that apart from Christ they are nothing, and that the human heart is unstable and prone to self-deception. Jeremiah 17:9. Such an awareness causes them to tread carefully, leaning not on their own understanding but on the Spirit of truth, who alone anchors them in Christ.

But what are we left with if this is true? If we are indeed deceived in that truth that we've embraced in reference to the gospel of Christ? Amongst other things, it would imply that the gospel is not clear, that it can be interpreted in countless ways and no one can ever know who is right. That conclusion is somewhat devastating because in my thoughts it strikes at the very core of the gospel itself. If the gospel is not clear, then the cross is shrouded in uncertainty, and the promises of God are left hanging in mid-air. It would mean that no one can ever know with confidence whether they are truly in Christ, for what is obscure cannot be believed with assurance. And if such were the case, then the distinction between truth and error would vanish altogether. Isaiah 5:20. The reason so few see it is not because the message is muddled, but because it must be revealed by the Spirit. II Corinthians 4:3. What remains hidden to the world is made plain in Christ, for the gospel does not blur the line between truth and error but sets it in sharp contrast. In Christ the dividing line is unmistakable, and by His grace the people of God are kept, not in confusion or speculation, but in the quiet confidence that His work is complete, Hebrews 10:14, and in that confidence they look to Him alone for all their salvation. Hebrews 12:2.

This is a marked line of distinction between those that are Christ's, and those that are not, a distinguishable “spot” of separation, Deuteronomy 32:5, which characterizes and formulates the believer's entire life in this sphere of God’s ultimate glory in Christ, or what we know as life. Romans 11:36. “The Lord knoweth them that are his,” II Timothy 2:19, and will not leave his elect to guesswork in the gospel of Christ. John 10:27. False gospels may mimic the language of truth, but they bear another mark. God’s children are known by their trust in Christ alone, their spot is the “spot” of God's children, Deuteronomy 32:5, resting in the finished work of the cross, where the line between truth and error is made plain, and salvation is seen in Christ alone. Galatians 6:14. If the gospel were uncertain, such distinctions would collapse, and every way would seem alike. But God has spoken plainly in the gospel of His Son, Hebrews 1:2, and in Christ the difference between light and darkness, faith and unbelief, is laid bare with unshakable certainty. “Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world, he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.” John 8:12. MPJ

A universalist friend has begun to oppose me sharply because I pointed out from Scripture what I believe to be a denial of the doctrine of Christ. He accuses me of thinking I know everything. I know that isn’t true, but it is bewildering and painful to be painted with that brush, as though certainty in Christ’s gospel were the same as arrogance. Painful for all believers because it always mingles such an accusation with a hint of plausibility, and the child of God, sensitive of conscience and desiring to be clothed in humility, feels the wound keenly even if the charge isn’t true. Though not a single one of us would claim infallibility, yet neither can we speak of God’s truth as if it were uncertain or negotiable. To be told that conviction is nothing more than conceit feels like a blow to the very root of faith, as though standing firm upon the gospel were itself a kind of pride. Surely there is a difference between claiming all knowledge and standing resolute in the truth Christ has revealed.

Such accusations echo the enemy’s voice, for this has been his method from the beginning. In Eden, the serpent’s subtlety was not a direct denial, but a whisper of suspicion, “hath God said,” Genesis 3:1, and when we attempt to stand firmly on the gospel, the adversary comes with the same insinuation, “hath God truly spoken; or is this only your private opinion, your own clever reading into scripture.” Thus he mingles accusations with doubt, hoping to shake our confidence. Yet the answer remains the same, our confidence is not in ourselves, nor in our interpretation, but in the Word of God revealed in Christ. His sheep know His voice, John 10:27, and that voice is clear and certain, however much the enemy mocks.

Such accusations echo the enemy’s voice, for this has been his method from the beginning. In Eden, the serpent’s subtlety was not a direct denial, but a whisper of suspicion, “hath God said,” Genesis 3:1, and when we attempt to stand firmly on the gospel, the adversary comes with the same insinuation, “hath God truly spoken; or is this only your private opinion, your own clever reading into scripture.” Thus he mingles accusations with doubt, hoping to shake our confidence. Yet the answer remains the same, our confidence is not in ourselves, nor in our interpretation, but in the Word of God revealed in Christ. His sheep know His voice, John 10:27, and that voice is clear and certain, however much the enemy mocks.

Such accusations echo the enemy’s voice, for this has been his method from the beginning. In Eden, the serpent’s subtlety was not a direct denial, but a whisper of suspicion, “hath God said,” Genesis 3:1, and when we attempt to stand firmly on the gospel, the adversary comes with the same insinuation, “hath God truly spoken; or is this only your private opinion, your own clever reading into scripture.” Thus he mingles accusations with doubt, hoping to shake our confidence. Yet the answer remains the same, our confidence is not in ourselves, nor in our interpretation, but in the Word of God revealed in Christ. His sheep know His voice, John 10:27, and that voice is clear and certain, however much the enemy mocks.

The gospel is not our speculation but God’s revelation; it does not rise from the shifting opinions of men, but descends from the unchanging Word of God, written, preserved, and fulfilled in Christ. Hebrews 1:1-2. Paul says, “I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation.” Romans 1:16. To declare it timidly or doubtfully would undermine its divine authority and power. Paul warns against giving an “uncertain sound.” I Corinthians 14:8. If the message is blurred, souls are left unsure about the only way of salvation. We dare not imagine that error and compromise are harmless, for they strike at the honor of Christ Himself. II Peter 2:1-2. “He that is not with me is against me.” Matthew 12:30. Neutrality here is an illusion, Christ is either confessed in truth or denied in error; there is no middle ground.

If the gospel is certain, then to speak with certainty is no sin. Besides, it's impossible for those that belong to Christ to treat the gospel as though it were negotiable, or to speak of the clear message of Christ as if it were uncertain. Believers do not claim to know everything, nor should they give that impression. Yet when it comes to the gospel of Christ, it cannot be reduced to one opinion among many. If the saints sound strong at times, it is only because His truth is too precious to compromise. Jude 1:3. MPJ

What God Cannot Do: Think about this, the scripture says thou shalt not kill, yet God kills every day, (“I kill and I make alive,” Deuteronomy 32:39,) and not only one with whom he is at odds with so to speak, but with those who may be considered his friends. John 15:14. Is God under His own rule of right and wrong? Is there some higher, immutable standard to which He has bound Himself, some law that measures Him? To speak in such terms is folly. The law proceeds from His throne, not above it. To imagine that the Giver is bound by the same prohibition as the receiver is to blur the line between Creator and creature. “For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king.” Isaiah 33:22.

His commandments reflect His holiness as it relates to men, not as it constrains Himself. God cannot lie, Titus 1:2, not because He is bound by some external chain, but because His very nature is truth itself. He cannot deny Himself, II Timothy 2:13, not because He is limited, but because He is unchanging, faithful, and perfect. To suggest that God is bound to some external law is to dethrone Him and enthrone law as supreme. If there were such a law above God, then God would not be God.

It's good to often be reminded that God's ways are not our ways, Isaiah 55:8, neither can he be measured by man's rule. Job 11:7-9. To attempt to bring the Almighty under the categories of human fairness, reason, or proportion is to reverse the order of things. The Creator is not subject to the reckoning of His creatures. He is absolute, sovereign, infinite, and eternal. The only “cannot” that belongs to Him is the “cannot” of contradiction to His own Being. In other words, GOD cannot cease to be GOD. Here is the foundation of worship, that GOD is GOD, unchangeably so. Every thread of creation is woven by Him, sustained through Him, and drawn back unto Him, to whom all glory belongs. Romans 11:36.

From this truth flows the certainty of the gospel. The God who elected us in Christ before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4, is the same God who redeemed us by the blood of His Son, and the same God who will glorify us at the last day. And this is the bedrock of our hope, for “the God that cannot lie, promised before the world began,” Titus 1:2, life eternal in Christ Jesus our Lord. MPJ

In my attempt to read the Bible from cover to cover for the first time in my life, I arrived at II Samuel chapter 11, this morning. This is the chapter which narrates how David remained in Jerusalem while his army went to war, saw Bathsheba bathing, committed adultery with her, and when she conceived, attempted to cover it by recalling her husband Uriah. When Uriah would not go to his wife, David arranged for him to be placed in the heat of battle and abandoned, leading to Uriah’s death. David then took Bathsheba as his wife, and she bore him a son. The chapter ends with the solemn statement, “but the thing that David had done displeased the LORD.” II Samuel 11:27.

David committed adultery and committed murder, and Scripture does not minimize that. Yet when we speak of his person or character, it is important to remember how God Himself describes him, “a man after mine own heart.” Acts 13:22. His fall was real, and the sins were grievous, but his identity was not bound up in being “an adulterer” or “a murderer” in the sense of a settled course of life. Those titles, in Scripture, usually denote people whose pattern is unrepentant continuance in such sins. I Corinthians 6:9-11. David's repentance, Psalm 51, shows the difference between a child of God who falls into sin and one who lives in it. He bore heavy consequences in this life, but God did not leave him under that identity. David was not “marked” as an adulterer or murderer forever; he was a forgiven sinner, restored by grace, though still scarred by sins consequences.

Interestingly enough, in I Kings 15:5, it says, “David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.” Notice how David’s life is summed up. The adultery and murder are not denied, but they are not what defines him. Though David sinned grievously, God still holds him forth as one who walked in His ways. This distinction is vital for the believer. Sin may stain us, but it does not define us if we are in Christ. God remembers His children in Christ’s righteousness, not in their shame. Just as David’s life is remembered as a walk in God’s ways, so the believer’s life, though marred by failure, is summed up in grace, “ye are washed, ye are sanctified, ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus.” I Corinthians 6:11. Such is the triumph of divine grace, that God does not define His people by their darkest day, but by His eternal purpose in Christ. David’s sins were real, but the record of heaven calls him “a man after God’s own heart.” What God declared of David, He declares of all who are in Christ, their story is no longer written in sin, but in righteousness. “This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.” Isaiah 54:17. The believer’s comfort is not that he has never fallen, but that Christ has never failed. His obedience stands where ours falters, and His blood speaks pardon where our conscience condemns. MPJ

An Arminian Transcript: “I hope the Lord will bless us as we come together in His name. Try to do the Lord's will. That's the main thing in this life, doing the Lord's will. And His will is that not any should perish, but that all should come unto repentance. Jesus paid the way for every man, boy, woman, and girl at the age of accountability to get to heaven. He shed His blood, the only way from earth to heaven. And we can come to Him, and all that do come to Him with a broken heart and a contrite spirit gets born again. When you give up yourself, you give up sin, you give up the world. You want the Lord above everything else in this world. I tell you, and you pray through, out of your own heart, talk to God, reason with God out of your own heart. You've got to have forgiveness of your past sins. And I tell you, the Lord will transform you and change you on the inside like He did me over 30 years ago. I tell you, it's a joy to be saved. I've already made my peace, my calling and election for sure. The Bible says if you do that and you rebel against the Word of God, then you'll be cut off and that without a remedy. But you just need to come to the Lord and while there's time, while the door is open, while He's extending His salvation to you, like we've always said and like the Bible says, that God always offers mercy before judgment. And thank God He’s got mercy upon me.”

The above is the first paragraph, without any alteration, of a sermon transcript that was featured on SermonAudio this week, broadcast by some Baptist “Church” in Georgia. As I began to listen, one thing became immediately crystallized in my mind, which is the undeniable fact that a “great gulf fixed,” Luke 16:26, separates the gospel of Christ from this message! This is no variation of the gospel, but its reversal. It replaces the promise of God with the possibility of failure. It tells the sinner that he is not helpless but whole, not guilty but capable, not ruined but repairable, so long as he tries hard enough. Such a message is not merely weak, it is anti-Christ. It is a “gospel” of self-redemption, man exalting himself in the place of Christ. II Thessalonians 2:4. It’s idolatry in religious dress, a golden calf built from the fragments of human will, and is as opposite to the gospel as light is to darkness, as life is to death. Isaiah 5:20.

Just as the Lord described the impassable chasm between heaven and hell, so too there is an unbridgeable gulf between the grace of God in Christ Jesus and the man-centered religion of Arminianism. One proclaims what Christ has done, finished, effectual, eternal. The other proclaims what man must do, conditional, uncertain, and dependent upon his own contribution. This “gulf” is not only doctrinal but personal, for it exposes the way a man regards himself before God. Matthew 12:34. It's the difference between a beggar who cries for mercy and a boaster who prescribes remedies. And so it is with all who trumpet such sermons, (blind guides leading the blind,) because they do not see themselves as ruined sinners, every word flows with blind confidence about what man must do, what man can offer, what man must decide. But this is the exact opposite of how the gospel addresses us. The gospel does not flatter the strong, but lifts the beggar from the dunghill. Psalm 113:7. Not only does it not come to the “whole,” it's not even addressed to them. Luke 8:10. Christ declared, “they that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick. I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” Luke 5:31-32. Those who imagine the way to life is “trying harder,” “praying through,” or “making peace with God” have never been silenced before God. Job 42:6. They speak as if sinners were not ruined and undone, but as if they were moral agents, capable of negotiating peace terms with the Almighty. This ‘poisons’ the very well of salvation. A “gospel” for the “whole” is nothing but poison to the sick. “For their vine is of the vine of Sodom… their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.” Deuteronomy 32:32-33. MPJ

KJV Preservation: It’s no pleasure to differ so widely from many whom are esteemed in the way of Christ, and whose ability and general knowledge far exceeds our own; but to use the words of another, “the Word of God is the greatest, most necessary, and most important thing in Christendom,” and we might add in all of the world, as there is nothing more essential, the neglect of which is to forsake our “own mercy,” Jonah 2:8, and to shut our ears to the only voice that speaks from heaven. Hebrews 1:1-2. For believers, there is nothing more precious as it is the ‘looking’ glass to behold “the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” II Corinthians 4:6. Every glimpse of divine glory, all comfort in affliction, every beam of hope that penetrates the thoughts and settles the mind in “that blessed hope,” Titus 2:13, comes to us through the word of the Lord. It is the sacred lantern by which we behold Christ, the bread by which we are nourished, and the rock upon which we stand. Ephesians 2:20. All truth emanates from its pages, as it governs our lives, formulates our thoughts, and determines the course for all our decisions. It is the only light in a world of darkness, without which man is blind to God’s truth, deaf to His voice, and lost in his own reason. All else will fail! Religion will crumble, nations shall fall, and we all will fade away as a leaf, Isaiah 64:6, “but the word of the Lord endureth for ever, and this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you.” I Peter 1:25. There is nothing more needful, nothing more glorious, nothing more divine! 

Inspiration without preservation would leave us with no certainty, for what good is a Word once given if it cannot be found today? In every age, God’s people have clung to the Word as their most precious treasure, whether Israel receiving the law at Sinai, David delighting in the Psalms, or the apostles preaching Christ from the Scriptures. It is in this same spirit that we approach the Authorized Version, not as a mere artifact of history, but as a vessel by which the everlasting Word of God has been preserved, proclaimed, and cherished. Paul thanks “God without ceasing,” that when the Thessalonians received the word of God they “received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.” I Thessalonians 2:13. And if the Word is in truth from God, then it deserves the same reverence as the divine Source from which it flows.

The God who breathed out every word of Scripture has also kept every word intact. Our Lord declared, “it is written, that man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.” Luke 4:4. He was quoting from Deuteronomy 8:3, where the same truth was first recorded. But this raises an unavoidable question, how can we live by every word unless every word has been preserved? If even one part has been lost, then the command becomes impossible. Christ did not say we live by most of God’s words, or by whatever fragments might survive the ages, but by every word.

Such a claim leaves no room for uncertainty; it demands assurance that every word remains intact, and it is here that the Spirit of truth, John 16:13, bears witness with divine authority, persuading believers to receive the Bible as Christ Himself received it in His earthly ministry. Our Lord never spoke as the skeptics of modern criticism. He affirmed Moses as the author of the Law, Mark 12:26, David as the sweet psalmist, Luke 20:42, and Daniel as the prophet Matthew 24:15; to Him, these writings were not fragments of uncertain origin, but together they formed one Divine Book, the Scriptures. Christ testified that they were given by the Holy Spirit, Mark 12:36, that not one word could be broken, John 10:35, not one jot or tittle could pass away, Matthew 5:18, and that every line carried God’s authority. Matthew 4:4,7,10. If this was the testimony of Christ concerning the Scriptures, can we believe any less? Christ’s view of Scripture must be ours. He affirmed Moses, David, and Daniel as true authors; He spoke of the writings collectively as the Scriptures; He declared them Spirit-given, unbreakable, and imperishable. To deny the preservation and authority of Scripture is not merely to disagree with men, but to set ourselves against the very testimony of Christ. And if Christ Himself bore witness to the Scriptures as inspired and enduring, then it follows that any view which separates inspiration from preservation leaves us with a hollow confession.

What profit is there in speaking of inspiration if preservation is denied? What comfort is it to say there once was an inspired Bible, if no such Bible exists today? Inspiration severed from preservation is like a candle without a flame, or a sword without an edge. The very purpose of God breathing out His Word is undone, unless He also supernaturally keeps that Word for every generation. If Scripture exists only in the originals, then Scripture no longer exists at all. Scripture, in the Bible’s own usage, is not confined to the originals but applies equally to copies and translations. When the Ethiopian eunuch sat in his chariot reading from the prophet Isaiah, Acts 8, he did not hold the original scroll penned by Isaiah’s hand, yet the Spirit calls what he read “Scripture.” The noble Bereans “searched the Scriptures daily,” Acts 17:11, but they did not possess autographs from Moses or the prophets, only copies, and yet these are honored with the name “Scripture.” Our Lord Himself, when He entered the synagogue at Nazareth, read aloud from the book of Isaiah, Luke 4:16-21; and it was no original autograph, but a synagogue copy, and yet Christ declared, “this day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears.” Likewise Timothy, from his earliest childhood, was acquainted with the “holy scriptures,” II Timothy 3:15, not fragile originals locked away in some museum, but copies preserved and received as the Word of God.

This is consistent throughout the whole Bible. Never once is the term “Scripture” used to describe an original manuscript. It always speaks of the Word of God as preserved in the hands of God’s people, the custodians of the faith, to whom the oracles of God were committed, Romans 3:2, and in like manner, in every generation, among those who are members of the household of faith. The preservation of holy scripture was never left to scholars, nor shut up among the curiosities of men, but openly committed to the household of faith itself, the living witness which stands as “the pillar and ground of the truth.” I Timothy 3:15. To them, as Paul declares, “were committed the oracles of God,” Romans 3:2, and through them the scriptures have been preserved in every age, not by clever reasoning but by the absolute authority of God, ensuring that the household of faith might ever hold the lamp of truth in their hands, unbroken, unquenched, and shining through every generation until the end of time. “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, but the word of our God shall stand for ever.” Isaiah 40:8.

And it is here, among Christ’s sheep, that the scriptures remain, guarded and maintained not by clever reasoning but by the faithfulness of Almighty God, Matthew 24:35, that across the centuries the sheep of Christ’s pasture might be called and gathered by the voice of their Shepherd. John 10:16. In other words, the Bible was never meant to be a relic of the past, but a living Word preserved among Christ’s people in every age. Inspiration is not locked up in some long-lost autograph, but lives on in the preserved Scriptures God has given to His church. “My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.” Isaiah 59:21.

Some argue that the King James Bible has been faithfully preserved, yet somehow deny that it is inspired. But how could such a thing be possible? If what God originally gave was inspired, then to preserve it is to preserve that inspiration. Inspiration does not evaporate in transmission. To claim otherwise is theological double talk, an attempt to separate what God has joined together. Preservation without inspiration would reduce the Scriptures to a lifeless relic, a mere form without the Spirit, like a corpse embalmed but no longer living. But the Word of God is not dead; it is “quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword.” Hebrews 4:12. What good would it do us if the Lord merely secured the form of His words, yet withheld the divine breath that gives them life? Inspiration cannot be limited to a one-time event in the distant past, for the Bible itself testifies that, “all scripture is given by inspiration of God,” II Timothy 3:16, present tense, not was. If Timothy’s “holy scriptures” (copies) were inspired, then so are the preserved Scriptures in our hands today. Otherwise, the promise of God is void, and the people of God are left with a book that looks like Scripture but lacks the authority and power of Scripture. Such a notion not only undermines faith, it contradicts the very nature of God who has magnified His Word above all His name. Psalm 138:2.

Among the prevailing opinions of modern scholarship/criticism is their assumption that God’s direct involvement with His Word ceased once the original autographs were penned. Inspiration, they say, was confined to that first act of breathing out His words, and preservation is acknowledged only so far as it relates to the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. Beyond this narrow scope, the transmission of Scripture is treated as little more than a human enterprise, fallible men making fallible copies, translators exercising only their own skill, but without the living hand of God. Yet this view strips preservation of its very power, reducing it to a natural process rather than the providential work of the Spirit. To suppose that the God who gave His Word with infallible care would then abandon it to the corruption of apostate men is nothing less than unbelief masquerading as biblical scholarship. Such a thought diminishes the supremacy of Christ over His own Word, and makes man the final authority. If the Lord has promised to keep His Word pure in every generation, Psalm 12:6-7, then translation itself must be under His guiding hand, lest His promise be made void.

And this is the inevitable result, to deny God’s active hand in preservation is to embrace what can only be called a deistic view of Scripture, as though God merely breathed them out at the beginning, wound them up like a clock, and then stepped aside to let the ravages of time take their toll for better or for worse. After all, it's only God's holy word, the voice by which He makes His truth known to His people.” John 10:27. Would God, having breathed out His Word, then entrust its safekeeping to the careless custody of Augustinian monks or to the rigid traditions of pharisaical scribes to safeguard His inspired text? Shall we imagine that through the long centuries of the reign of papal popes, who did everything in their power to conceal the Scriptures from the common people, God stood aloof, watching His Word bound in cloisters and chained to pulpits? Or that He left it to the skeptical ravings of “Bible” scholars gone mad, dissecting the living Word as though it were a dead specimen, or to so-called ministers who bow down before the shifting sands of Greek definitions as though the original tongues were gods in themselves?

This is not the God of the Bible. His Word is not a relic to be buried in the ruins of history, but a living, abiding seed, I Peter 1:23, incorruptible, eternal, preserved by the same hand that first gave it. The LORD does not merely observe history, but He minutely orders, directs, and orchestrates every single event in time in an all-comprehensive manner to the glory of His infinite majesty and power. “Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power, for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.” Revelation 4:11. Would the God who thundered from Sinai, who wrote with His own finger upon tablets of stone, now fall silent and surrender His testimony to the slow decay of parchment and the endless disputations of “biblical” scholars, men who, under the guise of wisdom, have done all within their power to undermine the Bible? How can that be? The same God who spoke with power then still speaks with power now. What Rome once attempted by locking away the Scriptures from the common people, the modern critics attempt by eroding confidence in their authority. One sought to chain the Bible; the other seeks to destroy its credibility. Yet in both cases the aim is the same, to keep the Word of God from being received as it is in truth, the living, abiding voice of the Almighty.

The same God who gave His Word has also kept it living in the tongues of His people. “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” Matthew 24:35. His words remain not only in ancient manuscripts, but in the tongues of His people, preserved by the same God who first gave them. What blind reasoning could ever persuade us that the Lord, having supernaturally inspired and preserved His Word, would then withdraw and abandon the work of translation to the pride and arrogance of human reason? Are we to believe that God, who governs the fall of a sparrow and numbers the hairs of our head, would leave the most precious treasure He has entrusted to His people, the very words of life, to stand or fall on the skill of scholars? To imagine that God left His Word at the mercy of scholars is to make man the keeper of Scripture instead of God. If He preserves His Word, He also governs its passage into the tongues of His people. Preservation that does not reach the common tongue is preservation in name only. If the word of the LORD is to be “very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it,” Deuteronomy 30:14; Romans 10:8, then it must be in the tongue His people understand. The Lord, in His mercy, has ever made His Word plain to His people, clothing eternal truth in the tongue of common men, ensuring that His Word is not a sealed artifact, but the living voice of the Shepherd to His sheep. “The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” John 6:63.

The tragedy of modern versions is not simply their contradictions, but their consensus, that man sits as judge over the Word of God. In their arrogance, men have placed God’s Word on the dissection table and are handling it like a corpse to be examined, subjecting it to their scalpel, not realizing that it is they who will one day be judged by it. John 12:48. Such tampering has only one result, a Bible reshaped in the likeness of man rather than received as the voice of God. Men have reconstructed the Bible after their own image. Instead of bowing to the authority of God’s Word, they have refashioned it to reflect their own philosophies, their own doubts, their own culture, and their own sin. Where God has spoken plainly, they insert ambiguity; where He has exalted Christ, they diminish Him; where He has drawn clear lines, they blur them. This is not preservation but perversion, not translation but distortion. It is the old lie of the serpent clothed in modern scholarship, “yea, hath God said?” To reconstruct the Bible after man’s image is to dethrone God and enthrone human wisdom. Every time a verse is cut away, every time Christ’s deity is diminished, every time the objective “faith” of Christ is substituted for the subjected “faith” in Christ, (otherwise known as Luther’s sola fide,) or the propitiatory work of Christ is diminished, the hand of man reshapes Scripture into a reflection of himself. But in contrast to man’s tampering, we behold the hand of God guiding His Word with perfect care.

Here the contrast is plain, man corrupts, but God preserves, and it is in this very contrast that we behold the marvel of God’s providence in history. He raised up men, fitted them with rare ability, and ordered the times so that the translation of His Word into the English tongue was carried out with meticulous care. Yet our confidence is not in the brilliance of men, but in the faithfulness of Christ, who declared that His words shall never pass away.

Here is a challenge to those who dismiss this so-called “extreme” view: If not the Authorized Version, then what? Name the Bible to which you will bow without hesitation, the book whose every word you receive as the voice of God. If you cannot identify a present and preserved Scripture, then you have no absolute authority at all, only the shifting sands of human opinion and scholarship. But Christ’s sheep do not live by uncertainty; they live by “every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” Matthew 4:4. The question cannot be avoided, was the Spirit of God at work in the giving of the Authorized Version? If the answer is “no,” then we are left with nothing more than the work of men, subject to error and uncertainty, and the church has no sure Bible in her hands. But if the answer is “yes,” and we confess that it is, then the Scripture we hold is not merely the fruit of human scholarship, but the result of God Himself guiding and overruling, so that His Word might be faithfully transmitted to His people.

It is with some reluctance that I take this further step, for I have no desire to offend those who preach Christ, yet necessity compels me to say a few things plainly. Thinking about those who have preached, or who are presently engaged in declaring the gospel, one cannot help but notice how many of them use only the King James or Authorized Version. Perhaps it provides them with a feeling of standing in the “old paths,” or gives a certain air of orthodoxy, tradition, or calvinistic flavor. Yet one cannot help but wonder how many truly regard it as the very Word of God, inerrant and preserved. Many will say that it is the most faithful translation, drawn from the most trustworthy text, and that they stand emphatically upon all which the bible teaches, taking it as their final authority. (One cannot but wonder, if it’s their final authority, what is their other authority?) But when pressed, that “final” authority often turns out to be something else, some imagined reconstruction of “the originals,” or the turn of a lexicon or word study that will usually tilt in the direction of one’s preconceptions. In this way, the KJV becomes for them more a banner to wave than a foundation to rest upon. They climb aboard the King James bandwagon with great enthusiasm, but quickly disembark at the first stop, the so-called “original text,” (which, ironically, does not exist,) where human scholarship lures them from trusting God’s preserved Word. They all follow the breadcrumbs of one another, lest they fall out of fellowship with their fellow deniers of an inspired Bible. 

How often have we heard this expression? “This is the best translation!” Why does everybody talk like that, all following one another’s tail, as if mouthing the same safe phrase were proof of conviction? It sounds orthodox, it sounds traditional, but it is little more than a borrowed cloak of credibility. To call the Bible merely “the best” is to imply degrees of imperfection, as if God’s Word were a matter of preference rather than certainty. Saying “the best translation” is not conviction but compromise, and it dodges the real question. Do you believe it is the Word of God?

In this present dark age, when delusion runs unchecked and error parades itself as truth, it is all the more needful that those who name the name of Christ be rooted and grounded in the certainty of God’s preserved Word. “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” Psalm 11:3. To be unsettled here is to leave ourselves open to every wind of doctrine, and to be swept along with the erroneous conclusions of the skeptics.

There is so much more that could be said, from ancient tamperings, to Origen’s Alexandrian corruptions, to Jerome’s Vulgate, and down through Westcott and Hort with their so-called “new” text, to which I might add, that these two men, along with those who embrace their skepticism, must rightly be named among the chief corruptors of the Word of God, who have done more to destroy the reputability of scripture than any that have gone before, by exalting a handful of corrupt manuscripts over the time-tested text of the church, they sowed seeds of doubt that have borne bitter fruit in nearly every modern version. The lingering effect of their work has not been greater confidence in the Bible, but a widespread suspicion that no Bible can be fully trusted, as though the voice of God must be filtered through the judgment of critics. Their legacy is confusion, not clarity; uncertainty, not assurance.

God is not the author of confusion, I Corinthians 14:33, yet confusion is exactly what arises when the authority of Scripture is questioned and parceled out among a multitude of competing versions, allowing scholars and publishers to set themselves as arbiters of truth, rather than falling down before the absolute authority of Scripture. Each new rendering, each alteration of words, echoes the ancient whisper of the serpent, “Yea, hath God said?” Instead of one sure voice, men are met with a babble of contradictions, and doubt spreads like leaven until confidence in Scripture itself is weakened, a slow erosion that strikes at the very heart of the gospel witness. What man unsettles with his revisions, God establishes with His unchanging Word. Isaiah 40:8.

With these thoughts in mind, I will go out on a limb to confess that I am “shipwrecked” in the persuasion, (which many may call extreme,) that the Authorized King James Bible is God’s inspired, preserved, and only authority; the sure and settled Word of God in our own tongue, and present and perfect testimony of His truth in English, and that God still speaks, and that his voice can be distinctly heard speaking in this word. Anything less than this inevitably reduces God’s promises to the myths of “lost originals,” depriving the sheep of Christ’s fold of the one sure voice of their Shepherd, and leaving them to wander amid the clamor of man’s opinions.

For me, the matter can end no other way. If God has preserved salvation in Christ, then He has likewise preserved His Word, the very instrument by which that salvation is made known. “Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart, for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.” Jeremiah 15:16. MPJ

Additional Comments: Thanks, brother. That was a very long post, and I really appreciate you or anyone taking the time to read it. I actually started writing it a few months back and only stumbled across it again on Friday. After proofreading it three or four times, I noticed some repetition here and there, but honestly I was so weary of re-reading it that I just decided to post it as it stood. My desire is that it might prove helpful to those confused about this important matter of Bible preservation, and what people dismissively label “King James onlyism,” a term I don’t much care for. For me, it’s not about waving a banner for a translation or a party spirit, but about clinging to the certainty that God has not left His people without a sure and settled Word. I believe this is a matter of confidence in the faithfulness of Christ, not merely in the skill of translators or the traditions of men. If the sheep of Christ are to know the Shepherd’s voice, then that voice must be clear, preserved, and distinct. That is why I wrote what I did, not to stir debate, but to encourage trust in the living Word of God that still speaks with absolute authority today. With brotherly love in Christ, Marc

Hey brother, I appreciate the question. It's a good one. When I speak of the King James Bible as the inspired and preserved Word of God, I’m not narrowing that down to the first 1611 printing with its spelling quirks, marginal notes, or printer’s errors. What I’m speaking of is the text itself, the inspired words, not the incidental features like old spellings or typesetting of a particular edition. The same way we don’t say Timothy had to hold the very first parchment of Isaiah to have “the Scriptures,” II Timothy 3:15, we don’t need to hold the very first printed sheets from 1611 to have God’s Word today. The translators’ work, brought forth by God’s providence, gave us a settled English Bible. Later printings only corrected typographical slips and standardized spelling, but the substance, the inspired, preserved words, remained the same. So, no, the claim isn’t that only the first printing of 1611 was inspired, but that the Authorized Version, as God has preserved and carried it forward, is His pure Word in English. Hope that's sorta helpful. Marc

Divine Imputation: A friend asked me to share some thoughts on divine imputation. I'll preface it with this, that much of what I'm attempting to convey is going to sound like a ‘personal’ confession of faith, and in a sense it is, but not in the spirit of setting up an “article of faith,” but I really don't know how to word it any differently without losing precision, or blurring the truth or lessening its weight. This is simply where I stand at present, until the LORD is pleased to give clearer light. I Thessalonians 5:21.

Divine imputation is the legal act of God’s grace whereby He accounts Christ as bearing the guilt of His people, and His people as possessing the righteousness of Christ, on the basis of Christ’s suretyship. Negatively, God “will not impute sin” to His elect, Psalm 32:2; Romans 4:8, because their guilt has been transferred to Christ, who “bare” their “sins in his own body on the tree,” I Peter 2:24, as it is written, “and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.” Isaiah 53:6. Positively, God imputes to believers the obedience and righteousness of Christ, so that they are “made the righteousness of God in him,” II Corinthians 5:21, justified “without works,” Romans 4:6, and accepted as “complete in him.” Colossians 2:10. This ‘act’ does not make Christ inherently sinful, nor believers inherently righteous; it is a judicial reckoning grounded in covenant headship and substitution. Romans 5:19. As Adam’s disobedience was imputed to his posterity unto condemnation, so Christ’s obedience is imputed to His seed unto justification and life. Romans 5:18-19. Imputation is not transfusion but reckoning. Our sins were counted to Christ, though He remained spotless; His righteousness is counted to us, though we remain sinful in ourselves. By this gracious exchange, “Christ was delivered for our offences, and raised again for our justification.” Romans 4:25.

Union is the fountainhead. Chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4, crucified with Him, Galatians 2:20, buried with Him, Romans 6:4, raised and seated with Him in heavenly places. Ephesians 2:6. Complete in Him, Colossians 2:10, abiding in Him as branches in the Vine, John 15:4, and joined to Him as his body and bride. Romans 12:5, 7:4. All that God does for His people flows from this vital oneness with His Son, in whom we live, and move, and have our being. Acts 17:28. Imputation, therefore, is not a bare transaction carried on at a distance, but God’s reckoning of what is already true in Christ our Head.

Union explains imputation, for apart from being one with Christ, there could be no reckoning of His righteousness to us or our guilt to Him. Imputation explains substitution, for the only reason Christ could stand in the sinner’s place is because their sin was truly charged to His account and His obedience counted to theirs. And substitution explains why God is both just and the justifier, because at the cross justice is satisfied, and grace is magnified, so that He remains righteous while declaring righteous the one who believes in Jesus. Romans 3:26.

Next, the ‘conversation’ turned to the “reality” of imputation, something I have not thought about for years, and in attempting to trace back the dividing points of what has been said before, is all a giant cloud bank to me now. Yet even through the haze, one thing remains clear, Christ is not divided, nor is He parceled out into the finer points of theological systems. Union with Him is whole, and all that flows from Him is one. Sometimes our distinctions serve clarity, but they can also make us forget that all righteousness, all life, all salvation is bound up together in the Person of Christ Himself.

The “real imputation” vs. “not-real imputation” talk is a false dichotomy. Scripture never makes that division. When God imputes, His reckoning is true and effectual, because it flows from our union with Christ and His suretyship. Imputation is not make-believe and not infusion; it is God’s judicial accounting, Christ made sin for us, we made the righteousness of God in Him. Romans 4:6,11.

Sometimes the phrase “real imputation” is used as if others believe in a “fake” or “unreal” imputation. But no one who believes the gospel is saying that. What God imputes is real. His reckoning corresponds to truth. Christ’s righteousness is real, and when God imputes it, it is as unchanging as the word of God which declares it. To say otherwise is to diminish both His righteousness and His grace. Imputation isn’t about adding adjectives like “real” or “not real,” as these only distract from the unity and simplicity of the gospel. Scripture’s own language is clear enough without our embellishments. If God reckons us righteous in Christ, then that is fact, not fiction. Blessed be “THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.” Jeremiah 23:6. MPJ

PS: I just wrote a short post on imputation, not to really answer much of what you brought up, but just to sort of gather my own thoughts together. You mentioned the darkness during the crucifixion showing our inability to look into such mysteries, and that is so true! At the cross the heavens grew dark, and in that silence we can see our own limits. The gospel humbles us because it takes us where human reason cannot go, into the mystery of God forsaking His beloved Son that sinners might be received. As Paul says, “great is the mystery of godliness.” I Timothy 3:16. On the other hand, as the Lord grants us a clearer view of this gracious reckoning, it draws us into greater awe of His sufferings, even when so much remains beyond our understanding. Just a glimpse of Christ crucified is enough to humble us and fill us with gratitude. We may not understand every detail, but we do know this. Christ “was made sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” II Corinthians 5:21. I think you “touched” the heart of it, righteousness is not floating in the air, but bound up in union with the Righteous ONE. “Of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us…righteousness.” I Corinthians 1:30. Todd is so very correct when he says, “these are not matters to argue about but to bow in total reverence.” Have a great night, Marc

“It is written in the prophets, and they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.” John 6:45. What a promise! There is nothing haphazard, nothing left up to man to figure out; not resting on our wit, our wisdom, nor our ability to somehow reason our way to God, but grounded wholly in Christ who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life. John 14:6. No exceptions, no uncertainties, every one of the elect shall be taught by God. God alone is the Teacher, Christ alone is the Way, and every one taught of the Father shall come. Here is the immovable ground of our consolation, not man’s attempt to puzzle out the gospel, but the eternal promise of God’s distinguishing grace in Christ. II Timothy 1:9.

When Scripture says that God’s people are “taught of God,” John 6:45, it does not imply that every saint becomes a skilled theologian, able to frame every truth in precise words. Rather, it means that the Spirit has written the truth of Christ on their hearts, so that when the gospel is proclaimed, they know it to be the voice of their Shepherd. John 10:27. It is a knowledge of recognition in distinction from a knowledge of articulation. In other words, the Spirit-taught “yes” in the believer’s soul will always align with the truth of Christ, even if they may lack the vocabulary to express it. The Spirit’s teaching ensures recognition of the truth, beyond human vocabulary. John 16:13. Salvation is in Christ, not in the measure of our comprehension, and yet that true knowledge, however simple, always has Christ as its content and boundary. MPJ

“Woe unto you, scribes and pharisees, hypocrites, for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” Matthew 23:15. This passage speaks directly to the spirit of religious zeal divorced from the truth of the gospel. Christ condemns the pharisees not for their lack of energy, sincerity or effort, but for their corrupt message and system. Their labors multiplied deception rather than truth, producing converts bound more securely in delusion than they had been before. And this is not confined to the Pharisees of old.

Today’s institutionalized and contemporary “church” is much the same, cloaking itself in scattered and detached fragments of bible truth, offering a general confession that has no root in Christ. Zeal without truth, converts without Christ. The name of Christ or rather “Jesus” is employed only to lend credibility to their system which, though cloaked in ‘christian’ attire, is nothing more than man-centered idolatry. The end of this kind of religion is always the same, it loses sight of God and collapses into a baptized humanism, where everything is for the benefit of man. Its creed is human need, its gospel is human comfort, and its god is man enthroned beneath a bible veneer. Everything bends toward man. Christ is no longer proclaimed as “Lord, to the glory of God the Father,” Philippians 2:11, but diminished to a life coach, a problem-solver, or personal advisor - a divine therapist, a self-help guru, in essence nothing more than a resource at man’s disposal to secure his own happiness. “Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever.” Romans 1:25.

It is the “gospel” turned on its head, man becomes the center, and their caricature of Christ is pushed to the margins. Everything turns manward. The Scriptures may still be quoted, but they are stripped from their context and repurposed to build an idol of man’s own making. Such a system, however draped in the trappings of christianity, is nothing but idolatry draped in biblical language. When they “convert” you, you “become” twice the child of hell, before, you were a “lost” sinner, but now you are a deceived sinner. In that sense, its converts are not merely lost sinners in need of grace, but now deceived sinners imagining themselves safe because of a false gospel. MPJ

Have we ever attempted to convey some gospel truth to someone, especially in regards to sovereignty, election, particular redemption, &c., and along with the usual scowl, are reprimanded with these words or similar, “you must think you are really special, part of some chosen few, better than the rest of us,” &c., which reproach is heavy indeed, and cuts deeply, for it contradicts the very spirit of the gospel in the believer’s heart, which is not to magnify oneself, but to glorify God in Christ. “Not unto us, O LORD, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory.” Psalm 115:1. For the believer knows better than anyone that the exact opposite is true. Grace leaves no room for boasting, for how can one who has been brought low in the dust imagine himself higher than his neighbor? Isaiah 26:5. To have glimpsed even the hem of Christ’s garment is to be stripped of all pretensions, and to see oneself as vile and bankrupt before God, Isaiah 6:5, which makes it nearly impossible to think less of others. Such a sight leaves the soul with no pedestal upon which to stand, no superiority to claim, no comparison to make, for the believer has seen the truth of his own condition, that he is undone and without strength. The Christian’s confession is not, “I am better,” but rather, “I am nothing, and Christ is all.” One paradox of the gospel is that the more it lifts us in Christ, the more it breaks us in ourselves. The world supposes that election and particular redemption breed arrogance, but the opposite is true. These truths have a crushing effect on pride and cultivate nothingness. A believer who has tasted the grace of God in Christ Jesus knows himself as nothing more than a debtor to that grace. MPJ Additional Thought:The Lord’s people often find it impossible to think less of others, because they already think so little of themselves outside of Christ.

A trademark of the Papist religion, and most of its Protestant stepchildren, is that “ignorance is bliss,” yet ignorance breeds nothing but pride! For pride thrives only where the heart is veiled, and man remains ignorant that outside of Christ he possesses nothing but sin and death. John 3:19. Should a man be awakened to the truth that he drinks from a fountain that he cannot command or fathom, and walks in a light not his own, a light he cannot kindle nor quench, his pride collapses at once. This lays open the deep folly of pride, for pride can only grow where light has not yet entered, “having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart.” Ephesians 4:18. To know the truth of our condition is to know we are but dust, and that whatever good, wisdom, strength, or grace we possess has been received, not produced. The proud man boasts of much, but in truth he possesses nothing but his sin. Jeremiah 9:23-24. Pride is therefore not merely ignorance in general, but ignorance of grace in particular. To see Christ rightly is to see self rightly, and in that sight pride withers. I Corinthians 4:7. For how can a man boast, when he lives by borrowed breath, walks in a borrowed light, and is upheld at every moment by a mercy whose depths he will never exhaust? Ignorance is not bliss, and ignorance of Christ is fatal! Hosea 4:6. MPJ

In Matthew 9:36, we read that when Christ “saw the multitudes,” that he “was moved with compassion on them, because they fainted, and were scattered abroad, as sheep having no shepherd.” In reading this, it struck me how the Lord did not divide them into classes of worthiness, nor did He withhold His kindness from one group while extending it to another. In one sense, He acknowledged only their need, not whether they were Jew or Gentile, rich or poor, respectable or despised, moral or immoral, learned or unlearned. His compassion was not parceled out according to human distinctions, but flowed to all who were lost and wandering.

He ‘saw’ them all alike, lost, needy, perishing. There is surely a lesson here for us as we consider the people the Lord brings into our lives. People with so many different backgrounds, different beliefs, and different ways of life; all kinds of people, all so amazingly unique and wonderfully crafted; people of every ethnicity, people of every religion, and every background, &c., even those whose lives run ‘contrary’ to God’s design. And if Christ looked on such multitudes with compassion, should it not be the same with us? For apart from Christ, all men stand in the same condemnation, and all alike are in need of the same mercy. Whether neighbor or stranger, friend or foe, the religious or irreligious, all alike need the same gospel, the same Christ, the same salvation. To embrace them, (not in the “bonds” of Christ, for that is impossible outside the gospel,) in the bonds of humanity, and in the truth that apart from Christ we are all in the “same condemnation,” Luke 23:40, (“for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God,” Romans 3:23,) and outside of Christ have no hope and are without God in the world. Ephesians 2:12.

In a sense, I would equate it to seeing ourselves in others, or “myself in everyone’s eyes.” Titus 3:2-3. In their weariness, we see our own weakness; in their wandering, our own straying; in their sin, our own corruption; and in their need, our own desperate need of Christ. This recognition keeps us from pride and makes compassion natural. For if we see ourselves in another’s misery, we cannot despise them without despising ourselves, and more than that, without forgetting the pit from which we were dug, and the mercy that first raised us up in Christ. “For who maketh thee to differ from another, and what hast thou that thou didst not receive?” I Corinthians 4:7. MPJ

My thoughts on Dobson. Christ matters more than what the world calls Christianity! James Dobson died today, and so, only with some hesitation I write this, yet I feel compelled to share a few thoughts. When my children were growing up, (and my wife and I are blessed with six of them,) on family road trips, we would often listen to Adventures in Odyssey, which probably was one of their (Focus on the Family) main programs. This program was geared to teens and younger children, and although I'm pretty bad at remembering, I know it featured some really likeable characters. Eugene & Connie come to mind, &c., who were always caught up in lessons about “doing the right thing.” Since we did not allow our children to listen to the radio, this was our entertainment on road trips. We had a full size conversion van, all tinted, and everybody just piled in the back. It was the ultimate family party bus, and I was the captain! It was the best of times.

Although our exposure to the entire Focus on the Family culture was limited to this, I knew that behind the children’s programs stood a much larger movement shaping what many people thought Christianity was. That influence reached far beyond family entertainment and self-help. For many, it defined the Christian life almost entirely in terms of family values, parenting techniques, and psychological counsel, and what most thought “Christianity” looked like in America. His voice reached millions, promoting a mixture of psychology, family values, and conservative morals. To the broader culture, he was almost the spokesperson for “Christian family values.” But therein lies the tragedy, what he offered was not the gospel of Christ’s grace, but morality clothed in Christian language, behavior reform mistaken for the faith of Christ, it was simply morality dressed up as Christianity.

From the little I’ve read, and from actually listening to him when I was in my early twenties, I know Dobson leaned heavily on humanistic psychology, blending it with various self-help techniques and behavioral therapies under the banner of “Christian counseling.” This self-help approach turned people inward, not only for relief from life’s struggles, but for salvation itself. It made salvation about you, your faith, your choices, your blessings, your life story, all centered on what you received rather than on Christ Himself, offering a remedy for life’s hardships and a counterfeit salvation.

God becomes little more than a servant to make life easier, while “Christianity” is reduced to self-help steps wrapped in a thin covering of Bible verses and churchgoing. On the surface it looks wholesome, but in reality it undermines the gospel, teaching families to rely on methods and morals instead of calling upon the name of the LORD who alone orders our steps, &c., and when their message turns to the “good news,” it became another gospel altogether, the gospel of free will, where salvation rests on man’s decision rather than Christ’s blood. This is no gospel at all, for it denies the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement and makes the sinner his own savior. Whoever does not see this has missed the very foundation of the Christian faith, which can be summed up in this: GOD is GOD. He alone saves, He alone redeems, He alone is sovereign over every soul. The entire system Dobson endorsed turns this on its head. It does not exalt God but man. It portrays man as the master of his own destiny, while reducing God to a servant, one who waits upon man’s will, who responds to man’s decision, who exists to save when called upon. What could be more wicked than such a thought? This is not the gospel of Christ, but a blasphemous distortion that robs God of His glory and leaves sinners with nothing but themselves. The true gospel proclaims a God who reigns, a Christ who saves to the uttermost, and a salvation that depends not on him that willeth, nor on him that runneth, but on God that showeth mercy. Romans 9:16. To embrace or endorse this sort of Christianity is to blaspheme the name of Christ by presenting a God who serves man, rather than the God who reigns over all. And here lies the danger, when we accept this counterfeit Christianity, we may still use all the right words, grace, faith, salvation, jesus, but we mean something utterly different. Words without truth deceive, and deception here is fatal. To deny the gospel of grace is not a small error; it is to deny Christ Himself. That is why this must be spoken openly and without compromise. The gospel of Christ is too precious to be distorted by the hands of men! To call error what it is, is not hatred but love, for only in Christ is there salvation, and to turn aside from Him is to embrace death. This is the religion the world has embraced as Christianity.

So, did Dobson leave behind a visible legacy? Absolutely! But not one of Christ-centered truth. His mark was to merge psychology with Christianity, to elevate moral reform above gospel grace, and to spread a false message of salvation, a distortion that in effect replaced the Christ of Scripture with one of his own making, and in so doing has left many utterly confused about what the true gospel is. MPJ

Aging & Christ: “Even to your old age I am he; and even to hoar hairs will I carry you, I have made, and I will bear; even I will carry, and will deliver you.” Isaiah 46:4. For many of us, aging is no longer just a passing thought that we can just set aside for the time being, but a truth that becomes clearer with every passing day. It's a blessed consideration in the light of the gospel, but in any other light, almost inconceivable to attempt to navigate! We wake to find ourselves older, weaker, more aware that this life, however precious, is brief. “For what is your life? It is even a vapor that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.” James 4:14. A truth that becomes clearer as the years go by. The mirror shows it, the calendar confirms it, and the aches of our bodies remind us that time marches on. II Corinthians 4:16. Scripture speaks plainly, “man that is born of a woman is of few days, and full of trouble. He cometh forth like a flower, and is cut down; he fleeth also as a shadow, and continueth not.” Job 14:1-2. What a sobering testimony of our fleeting existence, and striking reminder of our dust-like state before Almighty God. Genesis 18:27. We have no power to add a single day to our lives, and no strength to hold back the hand of time. Matthew 6:27. And yet, as the days pass and our strength wanes, we are reminded of how utterly dependent we really are. Aging has a way of humbling us, as it tends to strip away illusions of self-sufficiency, reminding us that our strength was never our own to begin with, pointing us beyond what is passing to Christ, the unchanging ONE, who upholds our life from the first breath to the last. “My times are in thy hand.” Psalm 31:15.

And if I’m honest, my greatest fear at the hour of death, or in the long or short seasons leading up to it, {though I'm sure I can come up with about a dozen more, being so fretful and unbelieving at times,} is not pain as such, nor even dying itself, but perhaps losing my mind and forgetting the gospel truths that have been my lifeline. Thoughts of Christ delight my soul, and keep me alive, as it were. I think, what is life apart from Christ? What is strength, or memory, or health, if the LORD seems absent? “Because thy lovingkindness is better than life.” Psalm 63:3.

Here’s also where my struggle deepens. I love this world; I love my family, my work, my 'brethren' in Christ, etc., and just the “ordinary” affairs of daily life. I can whittle away hours just soaking in the world around me, observing people, watching birds, strolling through a garden, watching the sun set, or simply sitting quietly with a cup of coffee, etc., I love it all, and I constantly stand amazed at the artistry of God’s hand in creation. To me everything is “the grace of life,” I Peter 3:7, and I’m so thankful for it all! “In everything give thanks, for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you.” I Thessalonians 5:18. And perhaps because of this, I have never been one to look at life and call it “all a mess,” though I realize, more with each passing day, that here we have no continuing city, but we seek one to come. Hebrews 13:14. Along those thoughts, I have often been bewildered, and unchristianized in my own mind, as I listened to brethren, some much younger than myself, longing to go home and be with Christ, and speak of the world as some dark and detestable place! That's not me! I'm not ready to go anywhere! Yet I know this also, the Lord has His own way of instructing us.

Another thing that I'm constantly learning is the fact that the Lord often doesn't give ‘grace’ until it is needed, and though now we may look upon, whatever it is, as almost unbearable, when the Lord's appointed time comes, we may find it made sweet in Christ; strength is not given until we are brought into weakness, or in other words, those things that we fear that the Lord may bring upon us as we are growing older and more feeble, (whether they transpire, or others take their place,) may just be the very things that drive us closer to Christ. And the grace we imagine we will lack, He withholds until the moment it is required, but when it comes, the bitter is turned to sweet in Christ. “And he said unto me, my grace is sufficient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness.” II Corinthians 12:9.

Perhaps the older we grow, the more we see that ‘our’ story is not about how well we have kept ourselves, but how faithfully the LORD has kept us. Genesis 24:1. Looking back, the pages are full of our sin, weakness, wandering, and unbelief, but woven through them all is the unbroken thread of Christ’s sufficiency. Romans 5:20-21. How fragile we are, but also how faithful Christ is. “My flesh and my heart faileth,” Psalms 73:26, and indeed it does, and we're not called to pretend otherwise. We know that we cannot sustain ourselves, “the journey is too great” for us, I Kings 19:7, but Christ giveth “power to the faint,” Isaiah 40:29, “for he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust.” Psalm 103:14. MPJ

Additional Thought: Thanks. We all struggle, maybe not in exactly the same ways, but there is a common thread that ties every believer together in Christ. That thread is His mercy, mercy that finds us in our frailty and never lets us slip away. “It is of the LORD'S mercies that we are not consumed, because his compassions fail not. They are new every morning: great is thy faithfulness.” Lamentations 3:22-23. I think perhaps the older we grow, the more precious it is to be kept, as in one sense, when our “hands” can no longer hold tight to all that which once defined us, they are freed to cling more tenaciously, by His grace, to Christ alone. Have a wonderful day, Marc

Just today, August 24th, 2025, I read that a well-known celebrity paid nearly thirteen million dollars for a sports card, a small piece of cardboard with a picture on it! Notwithstanding whatever shrewdness may be involved in such a transaction, consider the irony of it all in light of the “one thing needful.” Luke 10:42. Only one thing, and no amount of wealth can buy it. The treasures of men vanish with time; they fade like grass, riches rot, and beauty decays. It’s good to be often reminded, as Abraham confessed, that “we are but dust and ashes.” Genesis 18:27. Our life is but a vapor, appearing for a little while and then vanishing away. James 4:14. And yet, knowing this, men will still bankrupt themselves for the things of this world, while showing no interest in salvation, no regard to truth, no time for Christ.

We may cling to anything and everything in this life, only to discover in the end that we have nothing. “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” Mark 8:36. In fact, to cling to anything but Christ is to be left with nothing. Without Him we are hopelessly lost, whether we know it or not, boast of religion or despise it, whether we appear moral or plunge headlong into sin. At the end, all distinctions vanish, only Christ matters. “Thus saith the LORD, let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in his riches; but let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me.” Jeremiah 9:23-24. MPJ

LIFE SURGE: My wife on her FB feed keeps getting these advertisements for some sort of inspirational event coming to our area next month sometime. It's called LIFE SURGE. Here is how they describe themselves. “WHAT IS LIFE SURGE? Life Surge is a one-day live event designed to inspire, train, and equip believers to advance God’s Kingdom. We believe in faithful stewardship, using wealth as a tool to expand God’s Kingdom, share the gospel, and leave an eternal legacy. Life Surge empowers Christians to integrate their faith into their work and wealth, maximizing their impact for Christ. Join thousands of believers who are ready to honor God with their resources and live with eternal purpose. Through powerful worship, world-class speakers, and biblical financial insights, you’ll walk away, with clarity on your divine calling, be grounded in biblical wisdom for your finances, equipped with practical tools to build a legacy, be reignited with purpose to impact your family, community, and the Kingdom. This is a Movement. Not a Concept. This is a Transformation. Not a trend. This is a Community. Not a CROWD.” That’s quite the statement!

As I’m trying to read their mission statement, there’s this annoying countdown timer at the bottom of the page telling you that you have only a few hours to buy tickets at a special reduced price. Here is that breakdown: “Right now if you click on the link you can purchase a $197 ticket for the special price of $49, but only while this deal lasts. Additionally, there is a $497 option, but that has already been sold out. That included: The Best Seats. Priority Entry. Life Surge Digital Program. Life Surge Keepsake Wristband. Life Surge Tour Lanyard. Fresh Boxed Lunch Included ($15 Value) BONUSES. Photo with Tim Tebow. Photo with Calvin Johnson. Photo with Willie Robertson. So, are You Ready to Surge Your Life God's Way?”

This completely boggles the mind! How does any of this have even the faintest resemblance to Christ, the Scriptures, or the Gospel itself? It’s nothing more than a religious sideshow, a shameless charade clothed in “christian” language, making a mockery of anything remotely related to God or the scriptures; and the saddest part is how desperate and undiscerning people must be to engage with such deception, mistaking it for some expression of christianity when it is nothing but a lie. There is not the faintest trace of true christianity in any of this, unless one mistakes christianity for little more than niceness, feigned humility, and outward kindness. Meanwhile the gospel is silenced, the truth is dragged through the mud, and multitudes are kept busy with religion and all its pageantry.

It's so obvious that they use what the world calls Christianity as a tool to propel themselves forward and to promote their own agenda. They dress it up in spiritual language and market it with slick slogans, but at the heart it is nothing but self-exaltation. They say it’s about “advancing God’s Kingdom,” but in reality it places man at the very center. Notice how every promise revolves around you, your wealth, your calling, your purpose, your legacy. Christ is mentioned, but only as a convenient accessory to serve man.

One of the most troubling aspects of this Life Surge message is their constant obsession with building a legacy. A legacy for who? For your name? For your fleeting, pathetic life which God gave you for one reason only, that Christ might be glorified, whether in your salvation or in your destruction. “The LORD hath made all things for himself; yea, even the wicked for the day of evil.” Proverbs 16:4. The gospel of Jesus Christ is the exact opposite of this man-centered sham. It is not about you! Scripture never once calls anyone to build a legacy! Philippians 3:7-8. On the contrary, it calls believers to lose their lives for Christ's sake, Luke 9:24, to set their “affection on things above, not on things on the earth,” Colossians 3:2, it declares that “all flesh is grass,” Isaiah 40:6, that the “world passeth away,” I John 2:17, and that “here we have no continuing city, but we seek one to come.” Hebrews 13:14. The believer’s hope is not in being remembered for a legacy, but in being found in Christ and His righteousness alone. Philippians 3:9.

Listen to these words of David, spoken when he was hidden away in a cave, cut off from all the comforts of life, betrayed by his own men, and reduced to a man with nothing left but to cast himself wholly upon the Lord, “I cried unto thee, O LORD; I said, Thou art my refuge and my portion in the land of the living.” Psalm 142:5. What a confession. The weight of his words are staggering, he did not cry, “give me back my kingdom,” or, “let my name endure,” but rather, “thou art my portion in the land of the living.” What else is there to seek? What else endures? As Peter would later declare, “Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life.” John 6:68. Now listen to David again, many years later, no longer in the cave but reigning as king, “the LORD is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup, thou maintainest my lot. The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places; yea, I have a goodly heritage.” Psalm 16:5-6. From the darkness of a cave to the splendor of the crown, David’s confession was the same, the LORD was his portion. “Whom have I in heaven but thee, and there is none upon earth that I desire beside thee.” Psalm 73:25.

What a contrast to the spirit of the age, which treasures wealth, reputation, and legacy as the measure of all things, and then sprinkles it with a veneer of religion, not enough to interfere with anyone's life to any great extent, but perhaps just enough to soothe the conscience, christianize one's ambitions, and call a worldly life “Christian.” “Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits.” Isaiah 30:10. It is religion made safe, designed to give the illusion of heaven while clinging fast to the world. “No man can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” Matthew 6:24. David’s confession silences all such pride. It shows us that true blessedness is not found in what we gather, leave behind, or secure for our name, but in having the Lord as our portion. This makes the spectacle before us all the more nauseating, as men exploit the name of Christ not to proclaim Him, but to enrich themselves.

After all, I hope we for a minute don’t think this has anything to do with money? My wife looked up how much Tim Tebow makes for a single speaking engagement, and the figure is somewhere between $75,000 and $100,000, and up to a million dollars for “special events.” That's hilarious, these guys figured out how to make some serious money! One night on stage and he makes more than many of us do in a year. I work 45 hours a week at a meat processing plant and have never once made $75,000 in a year, yet these “christian celebrities” can pocket that in an evening under the guise of ministry. Dang, that’s a lot! Well let’s just hope these guys are tithing off of all this, as giving God the leftovers, sounds like a perfect business model for overall success in life. Do we not see the truth of Christ’s words here? “For the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” Luke 16:8. The people of this age know how to scheme, how to market, how to build platforms, how to draw crowds, how to amass fortunes, &c., and nowhere is this more evident than in religious spectacles of this nature, built on marketing and strategy rather than Christ. They discovered a clever way to package religion, turn “christ” into a brand, turn “worship” into an event, and the name of “jesus” into a money-making empire. Essentially, it’s the shallow world of christian celebrities and entertainers, where the name of “christ” is commercialized, religion is packaged, sold and consumed like cheap entertainment, and the world loves it, as it loves its own. John 15:19. That is why these spectacles are applauded, celebrated, and embraced, because they are born of the same spirit as the world itself. The world recognizes its own voice in the message, its own image in the methods, its own cravings in the promises, and so it loves what it sees. “They are of the world, therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.” I John 4:5.

At times one almost feels driven to disown any connection with what the world calls “christianity.” Not from a spirit of pride or self-righteousness, as though we ourselves were anything, but from a sense of profound astonishment that we've been given any measure of ‘gospel’ light to detest this sort of religious fraud that substitutes man for Christ. And if our Lord was zealous to cleanse His temple then, how much more should His people now be zealous to protest against these things, with hearts stirred that the worship of Christ should not be trampled under the feet of religious merchants. The child of God cannot stomach a religion that flatters the flesh, exalts man, and dares to profane the holy name of Jesus. As it is written, “the name of GOD is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you.” Romans 2:24. MPJ

“Jesus saith to him, he that is washed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit, and ye are clean, but not all.” John 13:10. In reading through John 13, only the day after writing my “timing of justification” post, and not looking for anything in particular, but Christ, John 5:39, I couldn’t help but pause at the 10th verse, where the Lord speaks about being clean. “Ye are clean,” are his exact words, and as I thought about them, other scriptures came to mind, like I Corinthians 6:11 & Jude 24.

I was struck with how these words could perhaps relate to the matter of justification, especially the thought that God has never looked upon His people apart from Christ, but ever as comprehended in Christ their Surety, when they were chosen in Him before the world began. (“According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love.” Ephesians 1:4.) Had they been viewed in themselves, apart from their Head, they must have perished with Adam in his transgression; but being comprehended in Christ their Representative, they were never separated from Him in the divine mind. “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” I Corinthians 15:22. (Highlights the two representative heads: Adam bringing death – Christ bringing life.) Hence their sins could be justly imputed to Him, and His righteousness as justly imputed to them. II Corinthians 5:21.

With those thoughts in mind, when Christ said to His disciples, “ye are clean,” we know that He was not pointing to some outward ceremony of washing, but to that inward purging which only His blood could accomplish. From the standpoint of the gospel, they stood clean even before the cross was lifted up, for in the eternal counsel of God they were already comprehended in Christ their Surety. The cleansing was not uncertain, nor depended upon the unfolding of time, but upon the finished certainty of Christ’s sacrifice, settled in the purpose of God, secured in the covenant of grace, and therefore as sure before it was offered as after it was shed.

This is why the Old Testament saints were no less clean than the apostles gathered in that upper room. Though the blood had not yet been shed in time, it was already accounted as shed in God’s decree and covenant. Their sins were not merely passed over in suspense but put away in Christ, whose death would in due time ratify the eternal counsel of God. Thus Abraham, Moses, David, and all the elect before Calvary were justified the same way as Peter, John, and all believers today, through the one offering of Christ, once for all. Hebrews 10:14.

Everything consummated at the cross, reconciliation, redemption, justification, was not the beginning of salvation but its public fulfillment in history. Christ, the eternal Surety, carried the guilt of His people before they ever believed, before they were ever born, before time itself. And for that very reason, Christ was able to say with authority to His own, “ye are clean.”

What a statement! “Ye are clean.” Whatever else may be said about this text, I absolutely love these definitive declarations of Christ that define the believer’s standing in Him. Such words are not left to our feelings, nor to our wavering experiences, but rest entirely upon His authority and His finished work. Additionally, in these words, “ye are clean” we see that even in our weakest moments, Christ does not re-apply His blood as though our standing depended on repeated cleansing. Rather, He reminds us that in Him we are already clean every whit, and then, in condescending grace, He stoops to wash the “dust” from our feet, not to make us His, but because we are His. “Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood.” Revelation 1:5. MPJ. Additional Thought: I do not say this to exclude other interpretations that may be faithfully drawn from the text, but to unfold the gospel truth that seemed to shine out here, that the disciples were already accounted clean in Christ, even before the cross, but never apart from the cross.

“And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, the LORD, the LORD GOD, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty.” Exodus 34:5-7. The moment Adam transgressed, the law declared its verdict, “the soul that sinneth, it shall die.” Ezekiel 18:20. Yet Adam lived. Why was he not instantly destroyed? Indeed, how is it that mankind itself still exists? Was his sin somehow excused? Was it overlooked? Could justice be suspended in midair, or set aside, even for a moment? “Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil, and canst not look on iniquity.” Habakkuk 1:13. God never overlooks sin! Every transgression must either be borne by the guilty or answered in the appointed surety. Romans 3:25-26. This was no suspension of justice, but the very essence of the gospel. The sentence that should have consumed Adam was accounted to Christ. Isaiah 53:6. “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin.” II Corinthians 5:21. God hath made Christ to be sin for us, and Adam’s transgression was no exception.

God’s forbearance in delaying judgment was never leniency apart from justice, but was always grounded in Christ, looking to the work He would accomplish in His death and resurrection. Romans 3:25. The second half of that verse from II Corinthians 5:21 tells us, “that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” Adam was spared, not because God overlooked sin, but because righteousness already stood for him in Christ. In a gospel sense, Adam’s continued existence was grounded in this, the righteousness of Christ secured life for him, just as it does for every saint across all ages. Christ’s work reaches backward and forward. The cross looks both directions. Romans 3:25 makes this explicit, that God set forth Christ, “to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God.” That includes Adam, Abel, Abraham, and all the saints before the cross. They were spared and accepted because Christ’s atonement, though accomplished in time, was reckoned from eternity. In other words, Adam lived because Christ was “made sin” for him, and Adam was accepted because Christ is “the righteousness of God” for him. Christ was no afterthought, but “the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” Revelation 13:8. Adam lived because Christ stood.

Justice was not delayed but always secured in Christ until revealed at the cross. “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; to declare, I say, at this time his righteousness, that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.” Romans 3:25-26. From what I can ‘see’ this passage shows why Adam and others were spared before the cross, not because justice was suspended, but because Christ was the appointed propitiation. II Timothy 1:9. There, delayed justice met its appointed hour, when all the sins of all God’s elect, from Adam onward, were executed upon Christ. Isaiah 53:11. God’s mind toward His people did not change at the cross; it was there revealed what had always been true, grace given in Christ Jesus before the world began. Titus 1:2. .

Alongside these considerations, let me add this thought, which is that the testimony of scripture consistently shows that those that belong to Christ, (“and ye are Christ’s,” I Cor. 3:23,) have never been considered apart from Christ, and that justice on their behalf has always rested in Him. Ephesians 5:32. In a gospel sense justice never regarded them outside of Christ’s righteousness. “According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love.” Ephesians 1:4. Thus, every sparing of Adam, Noah, Abraham, and all the saints before Christ’s death was not “justice on hold,” but justice already reckoned as satisfied in their representative surety. Hebrews 9:26. When Christ laid down His life, it was the representative death of all the elect in HIM. “I lay down my life for the sheep.” John 10:15. What was settled in eternity was unveiled at Calvary. II Samuel 23:5. In that moment, that “which was kept secret since the world began,” Romans 16:25, was now “made manifest.” Daniel 9:24. Besides, if the elect had ever been regarded apart from Christ, their end would have been Adam’s end, perishing under the curse. But they were never seen outside of Him. From eternity they were chosen “in Him,” Ephesians 1:4, and in time they are called, justified, and glorified in Him. Romans 8:30. His people have always been seen in Christ, never apart from Him. “I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.” Malachi 3:6. No sin is ever excused or overlooked; every transgression is either laid on Christ, or the sinner perishes under its full weight apart from Him. “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Romans 6:23. This shows both sides, that sin always receives its due wages, death; and that life is only found in Christ. Thus salvation is not a story of God setting aside justice for grace, but of justice and grace embracing in Christ. “Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace have kissed each other.” Psalm 85:10. MPJ

Timing of Justification: Roughly two years ago, I was asked by a friend to share my view on the “timing” of justification, a subject that, at the time, seemed to be stirring no small controversy, and one which was being used as a battering ram to take out any with opposing views to their own. I declined! And then again, a different friend a few months ago asked the same question, and once again, I just answered with probably two sentences, as I attempted once again to avoid the topic. Not because I didn’t care or had nothing to say, but because I knew I wasn’t then, and I’m still not now, completely settled in my own mind. I’ve heard solid, scripture-based arguments from both sides of this question, and it’s made me want to tread cautiously.

For clarity, I will call the two positions under consideration eternal justification and justification exclusively at the cross. In short, eternal justification holds that before creation, God set His elect in Christ and, on that basis, reckoned them righteous, with the cross in time as the appointed moment when that eternal verdict was executed and revealed. Justification exclusively at the cross asserts that justification was accomplished at a definite moment in history, when Christ bore His people’s sins, satisfied divine justice, and was raised for their justification, making the cross the decisive point at which God declared them righteous.

Both views, when seen in the light of the gospel, leave no room for the third; namely “justification by faith” understood in the unscriptural sense that God’s act of justifying the sinner takes place when he or she believes. This makes faith not the God-given gift that bears witness to an already-secured righteousness, but the condition upon which God’s verdict depends, as though His acceptance were suspended until man performs the act of believing. Such thinking is simply arminian conditionalism dressed in theological double talk, making man’s response the decisive hinge instead of Christ’s finished work. It shifts the ground of justification from the cross to the sinner’s experience, thereby denying the once-for-all accomplishment of reconciliation when God, in Christ, reconciled His people to Himself through His obedience unto death, perfectly satisfying the law and securing righteousness on their behalf. Philippians 2:8. This is foreign to the gospel and must be refused outright. Ephesians 5:11.

Quite honestly, I’m not exactly sure what the “reformed” view even is in all its details, but as I understand it, they generally teach that a sinner is justified at the moment he believes, sola fide, with faith being the point at which righteousness is imputed to him. (Some gospel regenerationists in the “grace” camp also embrace a distorted form of this.) To my mind, this comes uncomfortably close to arminian thought, the only ‘calvinistic’ safeguard being that such faith they call “the gift of God.” In this way, grace remains in the vocabulary, yet the decisive hinge is still the sinner’s act of believing, rather than Christ’s completed work in time, which alone secured our righteousness before God. John 19:30.

In thinking about the “timing” of justification, we can say before anything else that our safety lies not in tracing that moment on a calendar, but in beholding the unchangeable CHRIST as “the LORD our righteousness.” Jeremiah 23:6. Whether one holds to an eternal decree or an exclusive cross-centered accomplishment in time, the heart of the matter for all who look to the LORD for salvation is that justification is in Christ alone, grounded in His work alone, and made known to us by the Spirit, who will never let us rest anywhere else. To lose sight of this is to lose sight of the gospel itself. I Corinthians 1:30-31.

With that foundation laid, the question naturally follows, if our justification rests entirely in Christ, when did God first regard His people as righteous in Him? This is where the distinction between eternal justification and justification at the cross comes into focus. Those who believe in eternal justification, rightly understood in the light of the gospel, also affirm justification at the cross. The issue is not the reality of justification at the cross, but the point, “according to God’s eternal purpose in Christ,” Romans 11:5, at which His people were first declared righteous in His sight. Eternal justification affirms that before the world began, God set His elect in Christ and beheld them clothed in His righteousness, Numbers 23:21, with that verdict grounded wholly on the certain accomplishment of His atoning death and resurrection in time. Revelation 13:8. “In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” Ephesians 1:11.

In the light of God’s immutability and absoluteness, it’s a bit difficult to see how one who has an understanding of the gospel can deny that justification has an eternal aspect? God is eternal and unchanging. Hebrews 13:8. His purpose in Christ unshaken, His counsel unalterable, His will unthwarted from everlasting to everlasting. “Known unto God are all His works from the beginning of the world.” Acts 15:18. Is it not the common confession of all believers that before the foundation of the world, God determined to glorify Himself through an elect seed given to His beloved Son, and in that eternal purpose secured for them all the blessings of grace? “According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love.” Ephesians 1:4. These blessings were first given to Christ as the Head and Representative of His elect, and thus to them in Him, so that their acceptance and righteousness were never apart from Him. Ephesians 1:3. Though they did not yet exist in time, they stood in Christ from everlasting, blessed with every spiritual blessing in heavenly places, chosen in Him before the foundation of the world, and destined to be made manifest through His redeeming work in history. II Thessalonians 2:13. These are not speculative musings, but the plain testimony of Holy Scripture, which speaks with one accord on this glorious theme.

Before the beginning of time, God’s immutable decree placed His elect in Christ, clothing them in His righteousness, with the cross fixed as the appointed hour when that righteousness would be openly declared. Thus the “cross” is no mere token of an eternal decree; it is the place where salvation was accomplished, guilt was once-for-all removed, and righteousness was secured for all time. I Peter 2:24. That is where redemption was purchased, not only manifested but judicially secured, and where God’s eternal plan was carried out in history. “Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures.” I Corinthians 15:3. With this in the forefront of our thoughts in ascribing “greatness unto the Lord,” Deuteronomy 32:3, the witness of scripture makes it additionally plain that God has always viewed His people in Christ and never apart from the merits of His death on the cross, accomplished in time.

Grounded in the absoluteness of God’s purpose, Isaiah 46:10, this truth declares that Christ’s suretyship did not begin at the cross but from eternity, when He pledged Himself to fulfill all righteousness on the behalf of his people. “By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament,” Hebrews 7:22, which same chapter reminds us that Christ’s priesthood is “unchangeable,” 7:24, grounded in “the power of an endless life.” Hebrews 7:16. Such a priesthood admits no alteration, for the Surety who undertook the cause of His people from everlasting is the same, Hebrews 13:8, who in time secured their redemption, and who now ever lives to make intercession for them. Hebrews 7:25. “Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began.” II Timothy 1:9. From eternity, God’s elect were counted righteous in Christ, not apart from the cross but because of it, the eternal decree and the finished work in history forming one indivisible foundation, secured by the atoning work that Christ would unfailingly accomplish in time. “But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot, who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you.” I Peter 1:19-20.

The timing of justification, seen in the light of God’s eternal purpose, sweeps from everlasting to everlasting. In God’s decree, it is eternal; at the cross, it was accomplished; by faith, it is received and enjoyed. From beginning to end, it is grounded not in man’s work or will, but in Christ alone. This is the gospel, “that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them.” II Corinthians 5:19. To deny its eternal aspect is to confine God’s purpose to the unfolding of time; to confess it is to rejoice in the immutability of the grace of Christ, and in the unbreakable link between God’s everlasting decree and the perfect sacrifice that consummated our eternal redemption, Hebrews 9:12, “declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, my counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure.” Isaiah 46:10. This unbroken harmony between God’s eternal counsel and Christ’s work in time naturally leads us to see that what some frame as two distinct doctrines are, in truth, one undivided reality in the gospel. “What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.” Mark 10:9.

Eternal justification and justification at the cross are not competing doctrines when understood in the light of the gospel; they are two sides of the same unbreakable truth. Those who hold to eternal justification in a Christ-centered way do not deny justification at the cross. One speaks of God’s eternal counsel in Christ; the other of His finished work in history. Our ‘eyes’ look back to that moment at the cross, (the legal ground of justification,) because there, in that appointed hour, God’s eternal decree was executed in history. This is when justice was satisfied, guilt was removed, and everlasting righteousness was brought in. “But now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself,” Hebrews 9:26, “to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness.” Daniel 9:24.

Let me be so bold as to speak on behalf of all the Lord’s people, whatever differences may exist in how they describe the “timing” of justification, every one of God’s elect is united in this, we are justified at the cross. Isaiah 53:11. There, and there alone, Christ bore our sins, satisfied divine justice, took away our iniquity, and brought in everlasting righteousness for His people. Daniel 9:24. This is not a side doctrine nor a mere point for debate; it is the very heart of the gospel. Whether one delights in the eternal decree or speaks chiefly of the finished work in history, we are of one voice in declaring that our righteousness is Christ crucified and risen, and our standing before God rests on His blood and obedience alone. II Corinthians 5:21.

There is so much more that could be said on this, and perhaps in time I'll return to it, as a few more considerations still press on my mind. For now, I will simply close by saying that if in any way I have misrepresented the truth, misunderstood others, or clouded rather than clarified the gospel, I ask your forgiveness. May it please the LORD to mercifully correct and keep us all in the simplicity that is in Christ. “In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began.” Titus 1:2. MPJ

“Behold, I am vile; what shall I answer thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth.” Job 40:4. The hymn writer John Newton once wrote, “I have lived hitherto a poor sinner, and I believe I shall die one.” As we sink lower instead of rising higher, we may imagine God sees us as we see ourselves, failing, declining, unworthy. Especially when our gaze lingers on our own sinfulness, and we start to think that God looks at us with the same disappointment we feel toward ourselves, forgetting that He only sees us in His Son. Colossians 3:3.

We can become so aware of our remaining sin that we ask, almost in despair, “LORD, why do You still allow me to be so frail?” Such thoughts can lead to darkness of mind and bondage of spirit, drawing our eyes away from the unshakable truth that the Father never accepted us for what we are in ourselves, but for what Christ is on our behalf. In those moments, we forget that His mercy toward us is not measured by our strength, II Corinthians 12:9, and that His patience and purpose remain perfect and unchanging. Psalm 33:11. “Like as a father pitieth his children, so the LORD pitieth them that fear him. For he knoweth our frame; he remembereth that we are dust.” Psalm 103:13-14.

We are “accepted in the BELOVED,” Ephesians 1:6, not in the ebb and flow of our condition; on our worst day as on our best, our righteousness is Christ alone, unchanging, perfect, forever enough. Philippians 3:9. “For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.” Malachi 3:6. MPJ

LORDSHIP SALVATION: Last night in reply to a few messenger posts, a new friend from FB mentioned the term “lordship salvation.” This first paragraph is how I replied, and just left it at that. “I’ve heard the term “lordship salvation,” and I suppose I could google it, but I’m not entirely sure what it means, so I apologize. I don't keep up with all the latest theological trends or people, as I basically live in a cave, and only come out every once in a while, usually just long enough to refill my coffee and make sure the world hasn’t ended yet. Their life, like ours, is in the hand of the LORD. I'm so thankful that He is ‘patient’ with us all, and that He always teaches His people Christ. I should mention perhaps, that I do not follow social media on any platform, nor engage in FB apart from just posting my latest thoughts. If I'm allowed to live another 10 years, as I hope to semi-retire when I turn 70, I'll hopefully have a little more time for stuff like that? For now, I know my own tendency to get sidetracked too easily!”

So yeah, let me get sidetracked here for a few minutes, because I just googled the phrase, and this is the result, “Lordship salvation is a theological view that asserts saving faith in Jesus Christ necessarily involves a commitment to submit to His authority and Lordship in all areas of life, leading to a transformed life characterized by obedience and good works. It emphasizes that true saving faith is not merely intellectual assent to the truth about Jesus, but also a conscious decision to follow Him as Lord and Master.”

Well, that's a bad start before we even get out of the gate, since I completely deny this notion of “saving” faith. In fact I cringe when I hear gospel ministers toss that term around, like it’s some spiritual currency we hand to God in exchange for salvation, instead of the empty hand that simply receives what Christ has already accomplished. Isaiah 55:1. Faith doesn’t make salvation happen; it bears witness that salvation has already been accomplished in Christ. To call it “saving faith” risks confusing the evidence with the essence, as though the fruit of salvation were the root. Scripture never says we are saved because of our faith, it declares that Christ saved His people by His own blood, Hebrews 9:12, and faith is the God-given recognition of that finished work. “Saving faith” as a phrase can subtly reverse that order, making salvation feel contingent on an act in time, although for all that criticism, I do realize that the term can actually be used in a gospel sense.

From there, it’s only a short step to redefining the gospel as our commitment, surrender, and obedience, which seems to be exactly what “lordship salvation” does? It seems like the good news of what Christ has accomplished is replaced with a checklist of what you must now do. The promise of “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved,” Acts 16:31, is gutted, and in its place is a demand to prove your faith by a life of submission and obedience. In other words, you aren’t saved by Christ, you’re saved by Christ plus your surrender, your commitment, your performance. This is not simply adding a few rules; it is splicing human effort into the very heart of salvation. And the moment you make salvation depend on anything you must produce, it ceases to be grace. Romans 11:6. In that moment, grace is displaced, Christ is diminished, and you are crowned as your own deliverer. This hardly seems like the good news of Christ, but the old news of man’s effort dressed in gospel words. Galatians 5:4.

The gospel is not a staged offer, receive Christ as “Savior” today and upgrade to “Lord” at some later date. Nor is it a preconditioned contract where you must sign away a lifetime of obedience before Christ will save you. That is salvation by terms and conditions, works in disguise. To divide Christ into “Savior now” and “Lord later” is to fracture the gospel. Salvation is not a cooperative project, it is the once-for-all work of Christ for His people. His obedience is complete, His blood is enough, His righteousness is perfect. Faith receives Him entirely, and even that has nothing to do with us. “Not of yourselves, it is the gift of God.” Ephesians 2:8. Whether you make obedience a prerequisite or a later upgrade, you have made salvation hinge on you, not Christ.

Yes, the redeemed will follow their Redeemer, but that following is the outworking of salvation, not its price tag. Scripture says we are God’s “workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works.” Ephesians 2:10. This is echoed in the sure foundation of God’s Word, “the Lord knoweth them that are his; and, let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.” II Timothy 2:19. CHRIST knows His own sheep, plus He alone knows how to manage his flock, and the mark of His workmanship in them is clear, they follow Him, and by His grace they depart from iniquity. John 10:27-28. Lordship salvation confuses this order, making the proof of life into the source of life.

These thoughts are piecemeal, so I may revisit this topic at a future date, DV, especially if I read up on it a bit more, but one part of me is saying that this is hardly even worth the time, as it seems so obviously wrong! In fact it seems like it's got its own detonation device, and carries within itself the cause of its own destruction, as a house divided against itself cannot stand. Matthew 12:25. The few arguments I’ve read in its defense, when carried to their logical conclusion, collapse under their own weight. It’s not so much that you have to labor to refute it, it practically lights its own fuse. “Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein, and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.” Proverbs 26:27.

I mean, really, “you must receive Jesus as both Savior and Lord?” Christ is LORD whether you ‘receive’ Him, acknowledge Him, deny Him, or never even think about Him at all. Your opinion changes nothing. God has already declared Him to be “both Lord and Christ,” Acts 2:36, and His throne is not vacant, waiting for your consent. He reigns by the decree of God, a decree that does not await the consent of man, and is as unchanging as the ONE who gave it. Daniel 4:35.

In a twisted sort of way, this sort of thinking imagines a throne vacant until man consents to fill it. That's insane, the gospel is not an invitation to help Christ onto His throne; it is the proclamation that He already reigns, and that He has finished the work of salvation for His people at the cross. Faith does not make Him Lord, it simply receives the Lord who already is. Philippians 2:9-11. With those thoughts in mind, I’m willing to go out on a limb and say this isn’t merely bad theology, it’s dangerous. Galatians 5:9. In fact, I believe it falls squarely into the category Paul warned of in Galatians 1:6-9, “another gospel,” which is no gospel at all. This does not exalt Christ, it reduces Him to a helper in our self-salvation project. It shifts the pivot point of redemption from His finished work to our act of receiving, surrendering, or obeying, dethroning grace and enthroning human effort. II Corinthians 11:3-4. So no, this is not just a slightly different emphasis. It is another gospel, one that subtly dethrones Christ from the work He finished, and seats you beside Him as co-savior. And that is not salvation at all. Colossians 2:8. MPJ

There is a subtle counterfeit to the gospel that hides comfortably in calvinistic circles. It does not parade itself with altar calls or decision cards. It does not urge you to “invite Jesus into your heart” or “make your decision for Christ.” In fact, it often prides itself on rejecting such language as man-centered and unbiblical. And yet, at its core, it perhaps shares some of the same characteristics. I am speaking of the tendency to tie one’s conversion, and even one’s assurance before God, to the day or moment they came to embrace the doctrines of grace. In the ‘decisionist’ camp, salvation is linked to my decision, the day I chose to believe, repent, or commit. In the calvinistic ‘knowledge’ camp, salvation is linked to my realization, the day I grasped the truth of God’s sovereignty in salvation, &c. The packaging and vocabulary may change, but the root is the same, as the pivot point of salvation is shifted from the finished work of the cross to an event or experience in time, rather than to the death and resurrection of Christ, where salvation was actually accomplished. Many Calvinists would recoil at the comparison, but the logic is not far removed when a man’s assurance rests more on the clarity of his doctrinal framework than on the finished work of Christ.

The gospel does not begin with “when I believed” or “when I understood.” It begins with when GOD…when God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4; when God promised eternal life before the world began, Titus 1:2; when God sent His Son to redeem us, Galatians 4:4-5; when God commended His love toward us, In that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us, Romans 5:8; when God raised Him from the dead, securing our justification, Romans 4:25; when God reconciled us to Himself by Jesus Christ, II Corinthians 5:18; when God commanded the light to shine out of darkness and shone in our hearts, II Corinthians 4:6; when God delivered us from the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of His dear Son, Colossians 1:13; when God made us alive together with Christ, even when we were dead in sins, Ephesians 2:4-5, and when God called us by His Spirit and granted us faith in Christ. Philippians 1:29. The list could go on, but surely even the dullest eye can see the pattern, from first to last, salvation is not when we…but when GOD. “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things, to whom be glory for ever. Amen.” Romans 11:36. And though doctrine guards the gospel, right doctrine is not the gospel. Christ is the gospel. I Corinthians 1:23-24. And the grace of that gospel is not when we understood Him, but when He was lifted up on the cross, bearing our sins in His own body, when God chose us in Christ before the foundation of the world, when God sent His Son in the fulness of time to redeem us, when God raised Him from the dead securing our justification, and when God called us by His Spirit and granted us faith in His Son. From first to last, salvation is not when we…but when GOD. We are not saved because we understand grace; we understand grace because the God of grace has saved us in Christ, and that changes how we see everything. Ephesians 1:18.

Somewhat related is this, that not long ago, I heard of a ‘pastor’ in Florida that sort of suddenly came to a knowledge of the calvinistic scheme. Who knows, perhaps he got a hold of a copy of Pink’s “Sovereignty of God” or something, it matters not, but what I thought was sort of unusual, (and perhaps I am wrong in this,) is that after proclaiming to his congregation that calvinism was now the main course, (and watching about half of them lose their appetite,) he carried on preaching, same chef, new recipe; same pulpit, new flavor; no doubt served up with his latest “understanding” of the Bible. I don’t mean to sound harsh, but what? Carrying on as ‘pastor’ as if really nothing has changed? Perhaps because it was all he knew, which situation reminds me of the steward in Luke 16:3, who, when faced with the loss of his position, said within himself, “what shall I do, for my lord taketh away from me the stewardship, I cannot dig; to beg I am ashamed?” Stepping down would have meant facing his spiritual poverty; instead, he stayed in the role, not because the Lord had confirmed it, but probably because he could not imagine life without it?

Don’t misunderstand me, it is a great mercy when someone bound in the delusion of free will is granted even a glimmer of gospel light from the scriptures, but what I fail to understand is how, after such an upheaval of everything once believed, it’s back to business as if the truth of the gospel just required some minor adjustments? He kept the same pulpit, the same title, the same approach, only now with different theological seasoning. But Paul’s words come to mind, “ye have not so learned Christ.” Ephesians 4:20. The gospel does not renovate the old man; it puts him to death, makes all things new, and leads us to a knowledge of CHRIST. II Corinthians 5:17. Whilst I don’t dispute that some sort of mind reformation occurred, when a man is completely knocked off his horse, he doesn’t simply brush himself off, lick his wounds, and carry on as if nothing really happened; the course of his life is forever altered, his steps directed in the way of life, and his heart constrained by the love of Christ. A true encounter with the gospel should not merely adjust our vocabulary; it should humble us to the dust, strip away our self-assurance, and compel us to start afresh at the feet of Christ. When Christ lays hold of a man, the change reaches beyond his steps and speech; it also transforms the very object and nature of worship. Philippians 3:3.

“The light of the glorious gospel of Christ,” II Corinthians 4:4, and the “knowledge of the truth,” I Timothy 2:4, do not merely refine acceptable worship, they slay idolatry and raise up the only worship God receives, worship in Christ. Before the Lord opens our eyes, our worship is as the Athenians, “to the unknown God,” Acts 17:23, blind, misguided, and wholly unacceptable. Like the woman of Samaria, we knew not what we worshipped, John 4:22, for it was without the knowledge of Christ. Such worship, no matter how sincere, is nothing more than the vain offering of Cain, rejected because it is not offered through the Lamb God has provided. Hebrews 11:4. Only when Christ is revealed to the soul, II Corinthians 4:6, does worship become worship in truth, for only then is it anchored in His person, His finished work, and His perfect righteousness. And when that revelation comes, it leaves no room for boasting in ourselves, not in our decisions, not in our realizations, not even in our doctrinal precision. For “he that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.” I Corinthians 1:31. I’m so thankful that the LORD is ‘patient’ with us all, and that He always teaches His people Christ. John 6:45. MPJ

Getting Saved: A popular ‘evangelical’ confession, even among those who pride themselves on being “reformed” and “calvinistic,” is this oft-repeated phrase, “when I got saved” – “when did you get saved” – “I got saved…” Basically, different forms of the same unbiblical notion. On the surface it sounds harmless, but underneath it smuggles in an entire system of thought hostile to the gospel of Christ. From the outset, Scripture makes clear that salvation is not the product of man’s will, but God’s. Romans 9:16. Faith does not cause salvation; salvation causes faith. Acts 13:48. But these catchphrases of modern decisionism are in direct conflict with the language of Scripture. They shift the focus from Christ’s finished work to the sinner’s personal experience, recasting salvation as something conditioned on the day or the moment the sinner supposedly initiated it by believing, repenting, or “making a decision.” Such thinking does not merely distort the gospel, it replaces it with another. It subtly shifts the focus from Christ’s finished work to the sinner’s personal experience, making salvation hinge on the day or the moment the sinner supposedly initiated it by believing, repenting, or “making a decision.” It fabricates the unbiblical idea that salvation begins with the sinner’s will, rather than with God’s will. John 1:13.

Worse still, it is often used by those who in other contexts claim to deny “free will” because of man’s total depravity. Yet here they speak as if the decisive factor in salvation was not Christ crucified, but rather “when I believed, when I repented, when I accepted,” &c. When the gospel becomes “when I…” instead of “when GOD…,” it is no longer the gospel of free grace, but an experience-centered counterfeit. The gospel declares something altogether different. Scripture does not speak of salvation as something that springs into being when we act, but as God’s eternal purpose in Christ, secured at the cross, revealed in time by the Spirit, and faith itself rising in our hearts as the gift of His mercy. II Timothy 1:9. Titus 3:4-7.

Additionally, this sort of dialogue just reeks of Arminianism, and is entirely foreign to the language of Scripture. It shows that those who have joined ranks with the so-called evangelical movement speak “half in the speech of Ashdod,” borrowing the world’s man-centered vocabulary and mingling it with biblical truth, so that the pure language of the gospel is obscured. In Nehemiah’s day, this mixture meant the children of Israel “could not speak in the Jews’ language,” Nehemiah 13:24. In our day, it means many professing believers cannot speak in the language of Christ’s finished work. They default instead to the dialect of decisionism, “when I got saved,” “when I accepted Christ,” &c., phrases unknown to the apostles and alien to the New Testament witness, yet so entrenched in modern pulpits that many cannot imagine speaking of ‘salvation’ without them. Salvation is not an event man initiates, and Christ did not die merely to make salvation possible if and when we meet certain conditions. He died to save His people from their sins, Matthew 1:21, and by His one offering He secured that salvation forever. Hebrews 10:14. So to recast the cross as a mere “provision” that only becomes real when we add our repentance or faith is to preach another gospel. Galatians 1:6-9. Christ’s death did not make salvation a potential waiting to be unlocked; and the cross does not hang in suspense until we act. Furthermore, let’s not forget that faith and repentance are not currency we bring to God to purchase salvation; they are the fruits of the life God has already given us in Christ. Acts 5:31. Any gospel that begins with “when I…” instead of “when God…” is not the gospel of free grace. It is an Arminian-styled man-centered counterfeit that may sound pious but leaves the sinner looking to himself instead of to Christ. Hebrews 12:2. “He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.” I Corinthians 1:31. MPJ

Covenant of Works: Looking back over many years of dabbling in reformed & calvinistic theology, I realize that while it taught me many helpful things, it also trained me to accept certain ideas without pausing to weigh them in the light of God’s Word. And in reading the writings of assorted theologians, even those ‘sound’ in the gospel, I suspect I’m not alone, especially when it comes to the notion of what is called the “covenant of works.” For those familiar with the world of reformed thought, the term sounds as if it has always belonged to the biblical landscape, until you go looking for it in the Bible. You won’t find it. Yet despite its absence from Scripture, it has been lodged in reformed thinking for centuries, not because the Bible teaches it, but because it is built into the confessional scaffolding they refuse to revise. After all, they have the Westminster Confession of Faith, the Belgic Confession, and the Heidelberg Catechism to back them up. Then there’s the prince of the Puritans himself, John Owen, who wove it deeply into his covenant theology, along with names like Thomas Boston and Herman Witsius, &c., even within the past 50 years, you’ll find well-known figures like A.W. Pink, John Murray, Joel Beeke, (for myself, a local and modern puritan scholar who fully embraces it,) R.C. Sproul, and John MacArthur, &c., all of whom have voiced their allegiance to this man-made framework, treating it as though it unlocks the mystery of redemption. Even lesser-known names, like Don Fortner, bought into this, and I only single him out because he outlined it plainly in his Bible Doctrine book, whereas others are perhaps far more covert or undetermined in their views. It just shows how deeply this idea is rooted in the systems of men, reinforced by respected confessions and the writings of good men who, for all their strengths, often pass along traditional interpretations in a way that makes them hard to question when measured by the plain truth of scripture.

This teaching has been so deeply woven into the fabric of reformed theology (it’s one of its load-bearing beams) that I suspect it remains as common today as it was 40 years ago when I first encountered it. As I noted, its grip remains firm not because of the witness of scripture but the cement of creeds and confessions, long regarded as beyond revision, and guarded like family heirlooms which are never to be altered. So, what exactly is this so-called “covenant of works”? According to the Westminster Confession of Faith, “God gave to Adam a law, as a covenant of works, by which he bound him and all his posterity to personal, entire, exact, and perpetual obedience, promised life upon the fulfilling, and threatened death upon the breach of it, and endued him with power and ability to keep it.” In short, the confession teaches that God entered into a covenant with Adam, binding him and all humanity to perfect, personal, and unending obedience, promising life if he obeyed and death if he disobeyed, supposedly giving him the ability to fulfill those terms. This wasn’t just an abstract theological idea or doctrinal formula, it was part of a whole framework that had been taking shape for some time. It grew out of what came to be known as federal theology, which viewed all of God’s dealings with mankind through two main covenants, one with Adam before the fall, and another with the elect after the fall. For all its tidy logic, it diverts the eye from the one covenant of redemption in Christ.

From the limited research I’ve done, the earliest appearances of the term seem to trace back to Zacharias Ursinus, (chief architect of the Heidelberg Catechism,) and William Perkins, (the “father” of English Puritanism,) and by the mid-17th century, it had been fully enshrined in the Westminster Confession of Faith. Interesting enough is the fact that Calvin himself never spoke of a covenant of works, though some later theologians tried to read it back into his thought. The term itself is a man-made invention, and the idea behind it, that eternal life could be earned by man’s works, is an insult to the gospel. Scripture is clear, “God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.” I John 5:11. All of God’s dealings with man have always been in Christ, even before sin entered into the world. To think life could come any other way is not only untrue, but a rejection of the very heart of the gospel. Colossians 1:16-17. The covenant of works assumes that Adam stood in a probation period where life could be earned as a wage for obedience. But Scripture never frames God’s commands as a ladder to eternal life; rather, they reveal His will and, when broken, our need for His grace. Romans 3:20. There has never been an age when man’s standing before God rested on his own ability, nor a moment when Christ was not the ground of our life and righteousness.

So if you strip away the theological whitewash, doesn’t this “covenant of works” share the same root as Arminianism, each insisting, in one form or another, that life is within man’s reach if only he will exert himself enough to meet the conditions? Both systems begin by granting man a power he simply does not possess, as though divine wrath could be turned away by human effort rather than by the atoning sacrifice of the Lamb of God. Romans 5:9. One dresses it in the language of ‘pre-fall’ obedience, the other in ‘post-fall’ decision, but both leave man standing guilty before God, with nothing to cover his shame. Romans 3:19. In the end, neither system exalts God’s eternal purpose in Christ, because neither begins where God begins, with a salvation grounded in eternity past, consummated in history, and perfected in the person and work of Christ. II Timothy 1:9-10. And when that starting point is abandoned, the result is inevitable, man’s utter ruin in Adam is misrepresented, and the ground of our hope is subtly shifted from the finished work of Christ to the imagined potential of the sinner.

Whether polished in theological language or spoken in the simple terms of free-will religion, it remains the serpent’s old deception, Genesis 3:5, that man can attain to God by doing something. Romans 3:20. Though the details differ, both rest on the idea that man possesses, either before or after the ‘fall’ the natural ability to secure life for himself, whether by meeting the terms of a supposed works covenant or by exercising his will in the present. In either case, the premise is the same, life is within man’s grasp if only he will do what is required. Romans 9:16. But Scripture allows no such ground for boasting. From the beginning, life has never been in man’s power, but in the gracious gift of God, who has placed it entirely in His Son. I John 5:11. So any system that grants man the ability to secure eternal life apart from the sovereign grace of God in Christ is not merely flawed in its reasoning; it is fatally opposed to the gospel, for it shifts the glory from the ONE who saves to the sinner who supposedly can.

In summation, God’s purpose for mankind has always been bound up in His Son, “who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you,” I Peter 1:20, and He has never granted life to man apart from Christ, not in Eden, not under the law, and not in the glory to come. John 14:6. Even in Eden, the garden was never a proving ground for man to secure life by his own works, but the stage upon which the eternal counsel of God in Christ would unfold. Ephesians 3:11. To seek life anywhere else is to miss it entirely, for “he that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.” I John 5:12. Therefore, in light of the testimony of Scripture and the revelation of the gospel, II Corinthians 4:6, it’s difficult not to conclude that the claim that Adam could earn life apart from Christ is not merely unbiblical, it is anti-gospel. Acts 4:12. MPJ

Some brief thoughts regarding the life of Abraham. Abraham’s life was marked by significant trials, he left everything familiar behind without knowing where he was going, Genesis 12:1; he faced famine in the very land God had led him to, Genesis 12:10; he endured conflict within his own family, Genesis 13:8; he carried the sorrow of childlessness for many years, Genesis 15:3; and he faced the unthinkable test of offering up his “only son Isaac.” Genesis 22:2. Yet in Genesis 24:1, as an old man nearing the end of his days, it simply says, “the LORD had blessed Abraham in all things.” What a striking portrayal of a life that, on the surface, seemed burdened with adversity, and yet, in many ways, was remarkably ordinary.

In fact, when we trace the narrative of his life, it appears anything but spectacular. No signs in the sky, no fire from heaven, no thunder echoing from Sinai, no real outward glory to behold. Abraham's life was pretty normal, and he was just an ordinary man, who raised livestock, managed a large household, negotiated for wells, interceded for others, settled family disputes, grieved for the death of his wife, and just seemingly wandered from place to place. Nothing glamorous! Just a pilgrim life lived in tents, marked by waiting, weakness, and the quiet obedience of faith. Abraham “looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God,” Hebrews 11:9-10, and though it seems like he lived most of his life in quiet obscurity, yet through it all, the LORD was ruling every detail of his life. His tent-dwelling faith, though unremarkable by earthly standards, bore witness to a gospel rooted in promise, sustained by grace, and fixed on Christ.

Abraham’s record was never one of perfect obedience, but of perfect grace accounting righteousness to an imperfect man. Abraham’s story is not a testament to his ability to persevere but to the ONE who called him, sustained him, and fulfilled every promise in spite of his fears, failures, and faltering steps. And in this, he foreshadows all who walk in “the faith of Abraham,” Romans 4:12, a faith now fulfilled in Christ, the true Seed of promise, who upholds them, carries them, not only in weakness, but through every step of the journey. “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, and to seeds, as of many; but as of one, and to thy seed, which is Christ.” Galatians 3:16.

Every step, even the faltering ones, bore witness to a greater story, that God is faithful to His Word, even when we are not, and that His purposes are not hindered by our weakness but glorified through it. In Abraham, we see not a perfect man, but a faithful God who was ordering the steps of a man, not merely to receive blessings, but to become a blessing. Genesis 12:2. The God who called and kept Abraham is the same who keeps all who are found in the Seed of promise. And in the end, the words of Genesis 24:1 shine with eternal meaning, “the LORD had blessed Abraham in all things,” because He had given him Christ. “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it, and was glad.” MPJ

Gospel Sabbath? Nowhere is the confusion of law and gospel more subtly entrenched than in the reformed attempt to repackage the Jewish Sabbath into a “Christian Sabbath” on the first day of the week. Though well meaning, this tradition has no command, no apostolic institution, and no new testament example to justify it. The resurrection of Christ transformed the first day into a day of gathered worship and gospel joy, but never into a day of legal obligation. To speak of a “Christian Sabbath” is to blur the line between shadow and substance, law and liberty. Galatians 5:1. This hybrid construct neither honors the typology of the Sabbath nor the finality of Christ’s finished work. It trades the ceremony of the seventh day for a moralized version of the first, and in so doing, it declares, however unintentionally, that the rest Christ gives is not enough, and in so doing, it subtly shifts the believer’s rest from Christ’s finished work to man’s continued effort. Galatians 3:3. Paul warned against this very error when he wrote, “ye observe days, and months, and times, and years. I am afraid of you, lest I have bestowed upon you labor in vain.” Galatians 4:10-11. The Sabbath was a shadow, a sign pointing forward to the true rest found in Christ. Hebrews 4:9-10. What was once a day is now a Person. Matthew 11:28-30. In gospel terms, this rest is not found in observing a day but in ceasing from all efforts to justify ourselves before God. It’s not about laying aside our tool belt, but laying aside our self-righteousness. Christ is our Sabbath, our rest, our righteousness. Colossians 2:16-17. MPJ

Some of my thoughts on christian liberty last week received a bit of pushback, which I welcome, as I’ve found that even disagreement can be a gift when it leads us back to Christ. Still, I’ve tried to steer clear of getting too caught up in theological skirmishes or what I would refer to as debate-cloaked devotion, knowing we each see through a glass darkly. On the other hand, even the friction that arises from differing viewpoints can be a ‘blessing’ in disguise, prompting us to search the scriptures afresh, agitate our ‘gospel’ presuppositions, and travel down ‘byways’ that normally would be avoided. The only reason I'm referencing this is the fact that it made me think about human responsibility, and besides the opening paragraph which I’ve extracted from my replies, I just wanted to add a few additional thoughts, which I’m hoping may prove helpful to any who, like myself, have wrestled with how man’s inability intersects with God’s command, and who have come to see that what God requires, only Christ can give.

My ‘friend’ mentioned man’s “responsibility,” to believe the gospel, to repent, &c., and while scripture certainly affirms that man is accountable to God, I think it may be wise to axe that particular term when speaking in the context of salvation? It often smuggles in the idea that man has the moral or spiritual ability to do what God requires, which runs contrary to the witness of Scripture and the glory of grace. So when we speak of “responsibility” in salvation terms, as though man has the inherent power to do what God commands, we risk diminishing the sheer necessity and wonder of God’s grace in Christ. The issue is not that the natural man hasn’t been told to believe, but that he cannot. He’s dead in sin, Ephesians 2:1, blind to the light, II Corinthians 4:4, and unwilling to come to Christ. John 5:40. His condition is not ignorance, but inability. So to speak of “responsibility” as though man has the native ability to fulfill what God requires ends up obscuring the glory of grace.

Additionally, it risks suggesting that the failure to believe lies in the absence of human effort, rather than the absence of divine mercy. Romans 9: 13. It frames the gospel as an opportunity instead of a declaration; a potentiality instead of a finished work. The moment we treat “human responsibility” as man doing his part in his contribution to salvation rather than the evidence of his just condemnation and guilt before God, we veer into perilous territory, a man-centered gospel, where grace is conditional and Christ is diminished.

At the heart of the gospel is this truth, that salvation is of the LORD. II Timothy 1:9. It is not a shared effort, it does not spring from cooperation, nor is it sustained by human will, but wrought wholly by divine grace. And yet, the language of “human responsibility,” if left undefined or untethered from man’s inability, can easily become the doorway to synergism, the idea that man and God each play a part in salvation’s execution. Synergism is the notion that salvation is a cooperative effort between God and man. Grace is God’s provision; faith is man’s contribution. Synergism, even in calvinistic circles, often wears a clever disguise, when it says, “faith is man’s response, yes, but God gives the faith, so it’s all of grace.” This sounds pious, but underneath lies a quiet shift in emphasis. Faith becomes man’s contribution, and grace becomes God’s assistance. God may supply the gift, but it’s man who unwraps it, applies it, and activates salvation. Yet Scripture teaches not that man uses grace, but that grace uses man. Ephesians 2:10. The moment we say that man is saved because he believes, even if that faith is a gift, we subtly relocate the cause of salvation from Christ crucified to man believing.

If salvation is part grace and part faith, (as if grace makes it possible and faith makes it actual,) then we’ve turned the gospel into a partnership, and not a proclamation of Christ’s finished work. The gospel doesn’t call sinners to contribute to their salvation by believing and confessing, it announces what Christ has done for the ungodly and declares that all who believe have eternal life. Salvation isn’t by faith, it’s by Christ. And even that faith does not originate in man, but in God who shows mercy. Romans 9:16. In the end, no part of salvation rests on man, not his will, not his wisdom, not even his “response.” It is all of grace, all of Christ, from first to last.

Let me summarize by suggesting that any doctrine that mingles man’s effort with divine grace obscures the glory of Christ. Salvation is monergistic, the work of ONE. From eternity past to final glory, it is GOD who elects, the SON who redeems, and the SPIRIT who quickens, ensuring that every stage of salvation, from its decree to its consummation, is traced to grace alone. Romans 11:36. Grace does not make salvation possible, it makes it actual! MPJ

A trademark of the Papist religion, and most of its Protestant stepchildren, is that “ignorance is bliss,” yet ignorance breeds nothing but pride! For pride thrives only where the heart is veiled, and man remains ignorant that outside of Christ he possesses nothing but sin and death. John 3:19. Should a man be awakened to the truth that he drinks from a fountain that he cannot command or fathom, and walks in a light not his own, a light he cannot kindle nor quench, his pride collapses at once. This lays open the deep folly of pride, for pride can only grow where light has not yet entered, “having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart.” Ephesians 4:18. To know the truth of our condition is to know we are but dust, and that whatever good, wisdom, strength, or grace we possess has been received, not produced. The proud man boasts of much, but in truth he possesses nothing but his sin. Jeremiah 9:23-24. Pride is therefore not merely ignorance in general, but ignorance of grace in particular. To see Christ rightly is to see self rightly, and in that sight pride withers. I Corinthians 4:7. For how can a man boast, when he lives by borrowed breath, walks in a borrowed light, and is upheld at every moment by a mercy whose depths he will never exhaust? Ignorance is not bliss, and ignorance of Christ is fatal! Hosea 4:6. MPJ

The way of Christ is not a ladder for the strong to climb, but a door for the helpless to enter. It is not for the morally elite, but for those who, like the thief on the cross, confess they have nothing to offer and everything to receive, the exclusive hope of the ungodly who have no plea but mercy, Romans 5:6, whose hope is not in trying harder, but in trusting entirely. John 6:68. In Christ, the striving ceases and grace reigns. Romans 5:21. This is true liberty, not the freedom to perform, but the freedom to rest in the ONE who has performed it all. Christian liberty is not a calculated effort to glorify Christ, but the supernatural expression of a soul at rest in His sufficiency, and the spontaneous outflow of a heart captivated by Him. It manifests not in religious performance, but in sincere love, unwrought joy, and effortless thanksgiving, evidence of a soul no longer striving, but resting in the righteousness of ANOTHER. Hebrews 4:10. I began to write that Christian liberty is not the freedom to please ourselves, but the glorious freedom to please Christ, but really, what am I even talking about? Are any of our lives perfectly aligned with that which only pleases God? We must be delusional if we think so. I would imagine that most of us are painfully ordinary, nothing inherently special about us at all, or anything that sets us apart, as being different from anyone else. Luke 23:40. But there is everything extraordinary about CHRIST. Colossians 2:9. MPJ

Both Arminians and Calvinists turn salvation into a transaction dependent on man’s response. Arminians credit man for believing; Calvinists credit God for enabling belief. Both make salvation depend on the sinner’s response, rather than Christ’s finished work. One thanks man for believing, the other thanks God for helping him believe. In both systems, the gospel is obscured, for salvation is not in anything the sinner does, but in what Christ has done. Salvation is not secured by the act of believing, but by the obedience and blood of Christ. In essence both the Arminian and the Calvinist misunderstand the very nature of the gospel. The Arminian imagines he pleased God by choosing Him; the Calvinist, with more polished theology, and cloaked in the language of grace, thinks God helped him meet a condition, faith, repentance, or some inward act, &c., by which he now stands accepted. In both cases, the sinner imagines the gospel as a transaction between himself and God. This is not the gospel! The gospel reveals a transaction not between God and the sinner, but between the Father and the Son. “He shall see the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied.” Isaiah 53:11. MPJ

We sometimes hear someone described as a “godly man,” especially at a funeral or when reflecting on a believer’s life. “He was such a godly man,” they say. But in truth, there is only one truly godly MAN who has ever walked this earth, the Lord Jesus Christ. Scripture shatters every illusion of human ‘godliness’ apart from Christ, declaring without exception, “there is none righteous, no, not one.” Romans 3:10. Godliness, in its truest and fullest sense, is not a moral achievement nor a benchmark of human character. True godliness begins not with imitation, but with imputation, the gift of Christ’s righteousness to sinners who have none of their own. I Corinthians 1:30. We read that “great is the mystery of godliness,” I Timothy 3:16, and that mystery is not found in our moral attainments or outward displays of Christ-likeness, but in the staggering reality that His righteousness is imputed to us by grace. Godliness is not a virtue we produce, but a righteousness reckoned to sinners through the finished work of Christ. It does not arise from our striving to reflect Christ, but from the wondrous fact that Christ, the only truly godly MAN, stood in our place and clothed us in His perfect obedience. Isaiah 61:10. What we often call “godliness” in others, be it devotion, reverence, piety, &c., may indeed be the fruit of grace, but it is never the root. The true root is always Christ. Hosea 14:8. And herein lies the mystery, that what God requires of man, He has fully provided in His Son, in whom alone we are complete. Any ‘godliness’ seen in the believer is not self-originated, but flows solely from union with Christ. His obedience is counted as ours. His righteousness is imputed to us. The life we now live in the flesh, we live by the faith of the Son of God. May the LORD keep us anchored in this mystery, and may all our thoughts of godliness begin and end in Him. MPJ

Dispensationalists boast of their so-called “literal interpretation” of Scripture, a method they exalt as the purest form of biblical faithfulness. But what they call literal frequently amounts to a naturalistic reading, one that glorifies ethnic Israel above the elect of God, revives temple ordinances long ago abolished in Christ, and dreams of a geopolitical Messiah, and a worldly kingdom seated in Jerusalem. In doing so, it trades the gospel’s substance for types, the kingdom of Christ for the politics of men, and the eternal for the temporal. We likewise believe in taking Scripture literally, but literally according to its nature. The Bible is a spiritual book, given by the Spirit, pointing to Christ, and addressed to a spiritual people gathered into his name. “Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God.” Luke 8:10. A faithful literal reading must, by its very nature, be spiritual, anchored in the Christ-centered fabric of Scripture, not tethered to current events or geopolitical maps, but fully consistent with the unified harmony that pervades the entire Word of God. To read Scripture literally is to read it spiritually, through the lens of Christ, not through the lens of current events or the politics of this present age. Such a reading must reflect the divine unity and seamless harmony of the Word, that binds all of Scripture together, and speaks with one voice from Genesis to Revelation, Luke 24:27, and rooted in the progressive unfolding of His glory throughout redemptive history. Only in Christ do the scattered pieces of Scripture find their center. Christ is the key who unlocks every parable, the fulfillment of every promise, and the substance of every shadow. Colossians 2:17.

To read the Bible “literally” is not to drag its mysteries down to the level of human curiosity, but to see its fulfilled meaning in Christ. Dispensationalism carves up the Word of God into artificial ages, silencing the voice of Christ and fragmenting the unity of the gospel. As I mentioned, we also believe in the literal interpretation of the scriptures, but there is a literal natural interpretation, and a literal spiritual interpretation, and since the Bible is first and foremost a spiritual book, with a spiritual message to a spiritual people, so our literal interpretation of necessity must be of a spiritual nature, in harmony with all of scripture testimony. At its core, dispensationalism is not merely a misunderstanding of Bible prophecy, it is a misapprehension of Christ. MPJ

The book of Revelation has been the source of much fascination, debate, and confusion, and I claim no special insight when it comes to untangling the countless eschatological theories attached to it. Truthfully, I’m not sure anyone else does either. To my shame, I’ve embraced, rejected, and reconsidered each of the four major millennial positions, premil, postmil, amil, and historicist, at some stage in my life, and at this juncture, I’m convinced that though some may contain fragments of truth, none of them tell the entire story. Apart from the light of the gospel, the book of Revelation remains largely veiled, a deliberate obscurity that exposes the irony of our confidence, reminding us that no system or scheme can decode what was never meant to be deciphered apart from Christ, and that no amount of theological scaffolding can reach what God has reserved to be revealed in His Son alone. Matthew 11:27. It’s a reminder to us all that the glory of Christ cannot be mapped, managed, or manipulated to fit within man’s theological schemes or serve his prophetic curiosities, and that the full scope of what God has revealed in the book of Revelation refuses to be caged by human timelines and theological blueprints. The core of Revelation is not chronological, but Christological, it is not a sequence of events, but the exaltation of Jesus Christ.

Like Daniel, who glimpsed fragments of gospel truth by divine revelation and was granted a view into redemptive history, Daniel 9, so too may a solitary, Spirit-taught believer perceive something of its meaning. But when natural men, with unrenewed hearts and unillumined minds, attempt to chart its mysteries, the result is confusion, error, and theological shipwreck. Christ becomes incidental to their system, a supporting character in their eschatological chart. History bears witness. Scripture gives warning. “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8.

Additionally, let us not suppose that the need for caution ends with “the deceived and the deceiver,” Job 12:16, as though ‘error’ were confined to those who merely traffic in the scriptures. For even among those who love Christ, who truly believe the gospel, and perhaps even faithfully preach it, there remains a subtle danger; namely, the temptation to press beyond what is written. In our zeal to explain every mystery and leave no stone unturned, we too may wander into speculative dogmatism, mistaking conjecture for revelation, and inadvertently marring the simplicity that is in Christ. II Corinthians 11:3. Here the issue is not the rejection of what God has said, but the reckless expansion of it, and the subtle embellishment of what God has revealed. (“Be not rash with thy mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty to utter any thing before God, for God is in heaven, and thou upon earth, therefore let thy words be few.” Ecclesiastes 5:2.) Such zeal, though well-intentioned, can turn reverent scriptural study into reckless speculation. What sometimes begins as a search for truth often hardens into expositional dogmatism, as almost every passage is made to conform to a predetermined path and every symbol is forced into a rigid framework, and the humble posture of a student of scripture is soon replaced by the presumption of an expert or scholar, or the posture of a doctrinal gatekeeper.

Over the years I’ve listened to countless messages from well meaning brethren claiming to have some heavenly insight into this book, flipped through stacks of commentaries, and trudged through more eschatological papers than I care to remember, and what strikes me most is the confidence with which men speak of matters God has not made plain. Perhaps it’s the subtle pride that arises in claiming to know what others do not, to be wise above what is written, or to possess a knowledge that sets us apart? I Corinthians 8:1. None of us are immune! And perhaps the greater danger is not in being wrong, but in being proud of being right, especially when God has chosen in His wisdom, to leave certain things veiled. Romans 12:3.

Then again, perhaps the reason I find such certainty so baffling is not because the Scriptures are unclear, but because I am? That I lack the spiritual discernment to grasp what others, by divine illumination, have seen clearly? Perhaps, in all my caution, I have missed what the Spirit has plainly made known to others? These thoughts come with weight. But even then, even when I suspect my own blindness, I once again cannot escape the conviction that the Lord has not chosen to make every detail plain, and that if the ‘truth’ extracted from these scriptures were so clear, why does every “clear” system contradict the next? Why does absolute certainty wear so many different masks? All in all, my thoughts are that the LORD has not called us to decipher mysteries, but to follow Christ. And I find peace in this, that the light we need most is not the key to prophecy, but the knowledge of the ONE who is Himself the fulfillment of all prophecy, Jesus Christ, the Alpha and the Omega. Revelation 1:8. The only true wisdom in these matters is to confess our blindness apart from Christ. It’s all about Christ glorified, enthroned, and unveiled. The symbols point to Him. The judgments proceed from Him, and the hope belongs to those who belong to Him. “The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Revelation 19:10. MPJ

Hatred of the World: “The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil.” John 7:7. The world never hates its own! Christ is not speaking merely of humanity in general, but the ‘spirit’ of this age, (whether cloaked in vice or veiled in piety,) it’s spiritual order, it’s system of pride, self-righteousness, and rebellion that governs fallen man. In contrast, the world welcomes those who parrot its voice, praise its righteousness, and veil its rejection of Christ with religious robes. It has no quarrel with a religion that feeds and flatters its pride, but only hates that which exposes it, and that which is alien to its own spirit, John 15:19, and CHRIST was its great Exposer! Luke 16:15.

Let’s not fool ourselves, this world is never neutral but stands militantly opposed to the truth of the gospel. It despised Christ not for condemning vice, but for exposing virtue falsely so called. And modern religion, far from opposing the world, has made peace with it, baptizing its pride, sanctifying its rebellion, and calling it faith. It serves up a “gospel” that offends no one, a Christ who affirms everyone, and a “salvation” made in man’s image, therapeutic, mechanical, and religiously retrofitted to fit the contours of his own ego and the framework of his own virtue.

Think about it, the world did not hate Christ because of His moral perfection, for healing the sick, feeding the hungry, or doing good, &c., but because He was divinely offensive! Christ didn’t simply reveal vice, but exposed the darkness men cloaked in virtue. He unveiled the corruption beneath religion, the pride beneath piety, and the death beneath man’s imagined goodness. And wherever the gospel is faithfully proclaimed, that same hatred resurfaces, not because it threatens man’s vices, but because it exposes his virtues as filthy rags. The offense of the cross lies not in what it takes from man, but in what it declares he never had to begin with, righteousness. “There is none righteous, no, not one.” Romans 3:10. That is what the world cannot endure!

Men can part with possessions, prestige, even liberty, and often do so with stoic resignation. They will forfeit comfort, endure suffering, relinquish wealth, and even lay down their lives for a cause. But strip him of his religion, his virtue, his moral achievements, his sense of being “good enough,” and you provoke the fiercest resistance. Nothing offends like the suggestion that man’s best is worthless, that his devout efforts count for nothing, and that salvation cannot be earned but must be received as one utterly bankrupt. That is the offense of the cross! That is why the religious man, not just the immoral one, hates the cross. For the cross does not merely condemn his sins, it nullifies his righteousness, and that is an unforgivable offense. MPJ

Every Idle Word: “But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.” Matthew 12:36. I can generally tolerate many things in a conversation, but the moment someone takes the Lord’s name in vain, (in person or on screen,) whether flippantly, mockingly, or profanely, everything else they say dies right there and then. This is the only name under heaven given amongst men whereby we must be saved. Acts 4:12. To invoke it thoughtlessly, to trivialize it in casual speech, or to hurl it as a curse is nothing short of open blasphemy; not veiled or subtle, but public, casual, flippant, and unashamed. “Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.” Exodus 20:7.

There is something distinctly repulsive about the irreverent use of the name of CHRIST. Whether it is hurled in defiance by the openly profane, or tossed about carelessly by professing believers who speak it without reverence, without understanding, and without fear. What the world mocks with cursing; the ‘church’ empties with vain repetition. One dishonors Christ in open hatred, the other in hollow familiarity, and yet both desecrate the NAME before which “every knee” shall bow, and every “tongue confess.” Philippians 2:11. To take the Lord’s name in vain is not merely to speak it irreverently, but to strip it of its weight, its worth, and its wonder. It is to name the name of Christ without regard for who He is, and to handle that name with such thoughtless familiarity is not a mark of devotion, but a sign of contempt.

What other name is so abused? The world does not hurl the names of its own prophets or gods as expletives. It is CHRIST alone whose name is dragged through the mud, mocked in comedy, cursed in anger, and trivialized in religion. Why? No one stubs their toe and shouts, “Muhammad” or “Buddha.” No one turns the name of Gandhi, Confucius, or Moses into a punchline or a profanity. It is dragged through the dirt by comedians, cursed in moments of rage, and cheapened by religious lips that speak it without fear or love. Why such singular contempt? Why such targeted mockery? Because that name does not belong to a mere man, a philosopher, or a religious leader, it belongs to the “LORD of glory,” I Corinthians 2:8. This is why the world cannot remain neutral. Christ forces a verdict. His name exposes the heart. It shatters man’s pride and confronts his rebellion. To confess that name truly is to renounce all other allegiances. Luke 14:26. And so men rage against it. They mock what they cannot control, and they blaspheme what they refuse to submit to, their hatred only confirming his glory.

Thus, to hear Christ’s name degraded is to feel the insult as personal, for the believer has been purchased by that name, redeemed by that blood, and sealed under that authority. It is the name by which he prays, the name in which he stands, and the name to which every knee shall bow. How then can he remain unmoved when the world mocks what God has magnified, or stay silent when men trample underfoot the very name which is dearer to us than life itself! MPJ

Still thinking about Noah, the preacher, the builder, the solitary voice of warning at a time of unrestrained corruption, moral collapse, and spiritual blindness. “The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.” Genesis 6:11. “It was corrupt,” we read again in the next verse as “all flesh had corrupted” not only their own way, but first, and primarily the Lord’s “way upon the earth,” Genesis 6:12, in setting up so many idolatrous ways by which they corrupted the true worship of God. From the beginning, there has always been only one way, which is “the way of righteousness.” II Peter 2:21. Noah preached it, the prophets declared it, Christ fulfilled it, and the redeemed in every generation walk in it. Isaiah 35:8.

The apostle tells us that Noah was a “preacher of righteousness.” II Peter 2:5. While the ark was in preparation, Noah was preaching, in the spirit of Christ, I Peter 3:20, prefiguring the gospel, and declaring in prophetic witness that salvation could never be found in man, (but only in the righteousness of God’s provision,) that every form of man-made righteousness is a lie, and that outside of the righteousness which God provides in Christ, Philippians 3:9, all will perish. And here is the staggering irony, though Noah preached the only way of salvation, the world completely ignored him. Wasn’t there a vast population at this point? And only eight were ‘saved’? Noah must have seriously been the world’s worst evangelist! Yet, the measure of Noah’s ministry was not numerical success but faithful proclamation. Think about it, Noah’s preaching didn’t ‘regenerate’ a single soul, and ‘his’ little congregation never grew, but yet his message never changed. I Corinthians 9:16. Noah was not preaching social reform, tolerance for sin, cultural relevance, moralism, or behavioral improvement, and certainly not how to live your best life now. His message was not shaped by the preferences of the age, nor tailored to attract the multitudes. In essence, Noah preached the righteousness of GOD, and by extension, he preached CHRIST, the only refuge from judgment, the only “door” to salvation. John 10:9.

In light of this, today’s gimmick and results-driven pulpits, (which have turned the ‘gospel’ into a marketing scheme, and ‘salvation’ to a transaction,) are a tragic parody of truth, measuring success in decisions rather than in fidelity to Christ. Against such man-made theatrics, mechanized decisions and scripted ‘conversions’ where ‘salvation’ is reduced down to a formula, &c., we are reminded that it is GOD who quickens the dead, not man who coaxes them to life. Such distortions stand in sharp contrast to the gospel Noah preached. Believers are not called to ‘regenerate’ souls, fabricate faith, or multiply converts, but simply to proclaim the “way of righteousness,” the way of CHRIST, John 14:6, one SHEPHERD, one DOOR, one NAME under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. Acts 4:12. The ark was but a figure, Colossians 2:17, CHRIST is the substance. Outside of Him, there is no salvation. In light of what remains, one could almost say that the flood obliterated every pretense of man-centered religion and in essence left one testimony afloat, once again, that “salvation is of the LORD.” MPJ

There is no truth more certain and unequivocally affirmed in all of Scripture than the second and final and glorious return of Jesus Christ. This momentous event will bring history to its divinely appointed conclusion and fulfill the last remaining thread of unfulfilled prophecy. Kingdoms will crumble, and generations pass, but ‘time’ advances unwaveringly toward this consummation of all things, the visible and final appearing of the Lord Jesus Christ. “Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.” Titus 2:13. History is not an arbitrary sequence of events, nor a random march through time; it is a divinely directed procession moving with exact precision and glorious certainty to that “day and hour,” when time shall give way to eternity, and “the kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ.” Revelation 11:15.

As in the days of Noah, so it is now, a world absorbed in its affairs, as ordinary life continues, unaware that the long-suffering of the LORD has an appointed limit, and that beneath the hum and bustle of daily routine, the storm clouds of divine wrath were silently gathering, ready to break forth upon a world that had forgotten God. II Peter 3:9-10. “And as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.” Luke 17:26-27. God destroyed them all!

What an incredible thought! I don’t think of it often, surely not enough, but as directed thereto, enough to make me tremble in my thoughts as I attempt to evaluate the carnage. The sheer scale of the devastation defies all reckoning. Their “cup of iniquity” had become full to the brim, and the appointed hour had struck. Jeremiah 25:15–16. Intoxicated with arrogance, and utterly unawares, “sudden destruction” came swiftly and unrelentingly, “as travail upon a woman with child,” and there was no escape! I Thessalonians 5:3. And who shall stand when He appeareth? Malachi 3:2.

I can’t seem to get away from the fact that only “eight souls” were saved from immediate destruction. I Peter 3:20. Only eight people survived. EIGHT! God destroyed them all! Based on lifespan estimates and genealogical reckoning, some suggest the pre-flood population could’ve reached into the hundreds of millions. Could it be that the phrase “as it was in the days of Noah” isn’t just an analogy, but a precise parallel, down to the very number of those alive? Just thinking out loud, and I’m not advocating this position, only just staggered by the sheer thought of it. It’s an overwhelming thought!

This present world teeters under the same weight of iniquity that once brought the flood. Its judgment lingers not for lack of provocation, but because of divine longsuffering. “If thou, Lord, shouldest mark iniquities, O Lord, who shall stand? But there is forgiveness with thee, that thou mayest be feared.” Psalm 130:3-4. Were salvation not entirely of the Lord, from beginning to end, we would be doomed brethren. “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.” Romans 9:16. The flood declares what all of Scripture testifies, that judgment is real, mercy is sovereign, and Christ alone is the refuge from the wrath to come! II Peter 2:7-9. MPJ

WHICH COMES FIRST: The Rapture or the Iranian-Russian Invasion of Israel in Ezekiel 38-39? Forget the gospel, forget the finished work of Christ, forget the kingdom that’s not of this world, we’ve got temple blueprints, antichrist speculations, and satellite images of the Euphrates drying up! Every war is a countdown to Armageddon, every earthquake fuels their apocalyptic fever, every global crisis a drumroll for the apocalypse, and every catastrophe a confirmation of the system they’ve so artfully constructed and just another reminder that people will believe anything, except the clear testimony of Christ. Matthew 24:36. Don’t you know that we are in the fourth stage of the sixth seal of the third trumpet of the post-pre-mid-tribulation semi-final phase? Who needs the gospel when we’ve got prophetic charts, Middle East battle maps, and suspicious-looking barcodes?

Coincidence? How could it be? And don’t forget the revival of the Roman Empire (which may or may not be the EU, the UN, or the PAPACY, &c.,) which are all surefire signs that the sky is falling, and that the rapture is just around the corner. After all, we don’t want to be “left behind,” stuck in the tribulation with a bunch of unread Tim LaHaye and Hal Lindsay books. Meanwhile, Scripture is optional, but current events are compulsory, as nothing says “true spirituality” like eschatological schemes cobbled together from national headlines, half-verses, and leftover temple blueprints. Few things so brazenly contradict the blessed gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, as this prophetic hysteria, self-appointed seers peddling confusion, and a rebuilt sacrificial system that flat-out denies the sufficiency of Christ.

Welcome to the spectacle of dispensationalism, where the gospel has never been central, and salvation is assumed like a backstage pass. It’s a place where Jewish nationalism takes center stage, where Christ is sidelined for a reinstituted temple, and the church is dismissed as a parenthesis in God’s supposed “real plan.” It’s a seven-year script that never ends, and a world of delusion where Christ has never been preached and eternal truth is bartered away for prophetic theories and newspaper eschatology.

A system baptized in fear, held together by end-times hysteria, where Arminianism exalts the illusion of free will, and Dispensationalism fuels the fire with its end-times hysteria. One part makes man’s decision the decisive cause in salvation; the other makes Israel’s prophetic timeline the determining factor in Christ’s return. Both displace Christ from the center of redemptive history and enthrone human constructs in His place, whilst together they form a man-centered gospel where Christ is but a passive participant in their scheme of waiting for man to act and history to align. Grace is reduced to an offer; the cross becomes a conditional footnote; and the church is dismissed as an interruption in God’s supposed real plan with ethnic Israel. This isn’t “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints,” but a carefully staged performance where man is central, and Christ is reduced to a footnote in His own story. In fact, it’s all a stage production, an elaborate fiction cloaked in the language of Scripture, complete with actors, plots, and subplots, where man writes the script, fear drives the plot, (packaged as ‘spiritual’ entertainment,) and where Christ is little more than a supporting actor in their masquerade of the Christian religion.

All true theology culminates in Christ, and eschatology is no exception. Its pulse is the testimony of Jesus Christ. It should evoke worship and be Christ centered like all aspects of theology. It’s not a cryptic timeline to decipher, nor a puzzle to solve, nor a road map to the end, but a falling prostrate before that ONE who already has come, is coming again, and reigns even now in resplendent majesty and glory. “Worship God, for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” Revelation 19:10. From Genesis to Revelation, every prophetic utterance in Scripture ultimately points to him, exalts him, and calls us to fall before him in whom all prophecy finds its consummation. “And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last.” Revelation 1:17. True eschatology does not climax in events, but in the person of Christ, where every divine purpose finds its end. “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things, to whom be glory for ever. Amen.” Romans 11:36. The end is not chaos, it is Christ! MPJ

“But thou art he that took me out of the womb, thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother’s breasts. I was cast upon thee from the womb, thou art my God from my mother’s belly.” Psalm 22:9-10. “By thee have I been holden up from the womb, thou art he that took me out of my mother’s bowels; my praise shall be continually of thee.” Psalm 71:6. It’s 3:30 a.m., as I generally attempt to wake about an hour before I go to work each morning, and this morning I opened my bible to this scripture, (actually I was listening to the scriptures being read – e-sword – as I was getting dressed, and ran over and stopped the reel when I heard the first passage being read,) and then cross referenced it with this other scripture regarding the intimate nature of God’s absoluteness, in being involved in those things which the world deems as ‘natural’ occurrences, but as the scriptures point out, all things are from the hand of the LORD, and this in particular strikes me as very intimate and glorious, how from the cradle to the grave, the Lord knoweth them that are his, and carries them all their days. The psalmist doesn’t see random biology or natural process, but divine intimacy, God Himself active in every breath, every motion, every moment of our lives. Jeremiah 23:23.

The Lord was the One who brought us forth. He gave us breath. What the world calls natural, the womb, the birth, the infant’s cry, the mother’s care, &c., (and the arena of God’s creation glory is vast & infinite,) we acknowledge as divine. Every stage of human existence, from conception to old age, declares God’s all together glorious design and reveals His purpose. He was God to us before we knew ourselves, the ONE who authored our first instincts of hope, who held us up before we could stand, who knew us and sanctified us from the womb, Jeremiah 1:5, and etched his name upon us in time, Galatians 1:15, and in due season, revealed His Son in us, Galatians 1:16.

To say that God is involved in all things is not merely to affirm His power, but to acknowledge His nearness. The LORD is not an indifferent observer, but the wise and loving Author of every page we live, even those that appear unremarkable or even painful. What we call “natural” is, in truth, the unfolding of His purpose. How intimate and glorious this is! This truth quiets my heart. Psalm 46:10. If the most ordinary events are from His hand, then nothing is wasted, nothing is meaningless, and nothing is outside the realm of His purpose for us in Christ Jesus. Romans 8:28. MPJ

Before man had existence, before he could sin, repent, or believe; before he could act, choose, or respond; before he could lift a finger in obedience or defiance, his place in the unchanging counsel of God’s will was already determined. II Timothy 1:9. Election and reprobation both flow from the same divine prerogative, rooted not in foreseen merit or demerit but in the unfathomable counsel of “Him who works all things after the counsel of His own will.” Ephesians 1:11. This is not a reactionary decree, but an eternal one, rooted in God’s unchanging nature and eternal purpose in Christ Jesus. Ephesians 3:11. This utterly refutes the idea that salvation originates with man’s will, deed, or even his ‘fall’ into sin. Every shred of self-reliance is shattered, and we are left exposed, helpless and wholly dependent upon the sovereign grace of God in Christ Jesus. “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.” Romans 9:16. God alone saves, and He saves whom He will. MPJ

We hear much about the reformers, and their affirmation of sola scriptura, which I believe could be interpreted along these lines, that God’s Word is the absolute and final authority, the only standard by which everything must be measured. It is not one authority among many, but the sole voice of God to man, before which every human tradition, ecclesiastical decree, and personal conviction must bow. It stands supreme, self-authenticating, and wholly sufficient, because it is the very word of the living God. To deny this is to enthrone man in the place of God, and to subject divine truth to the shifting opinions of fallible men. Scripture alone rules the conscience, governs the assembly of the saints, and defines the Gospel. Anything that dares to rival it is to be rejected as error and idolatry. But the supremacy of Scripture does not stop at creeds and councils, it presses further, reaching into the very soul.

Our feelings, impressions, and experiences, no matter how vivid, heartfelt, or sincere, must bow to the authority of God's Word. They are not self-validating sources of truth. They do not rule us, they do not define truth, and they must never be allowed to usurp the voice of Scripture. Every emotion and inward stirring must be brought into subjection, examined, and judged by the infallible standard of divine revelation. For though our hearts may waver, God’s Word stands sure, and it alone has the right to govern what we believe and how we respond. Truth is not measured by what we feel, but by what the Lord hath spoken. “Feelings come and feelings go, And feelings are deceiving; My warrant is the Word of God, Naught else is worth believing.”

Whether or not these precise lines were penned by Luther or not, they do rightly assert the unshakable authority of Scripture over the unstable and deceptive realm of personal feelings and fluctuating experiences, an emphasis often overlooked by a generation enamored with emotionalism and subjective spirituality, where personal impressions are mistaken for the voice of God, and one’s subjective ‘experience’ is elevated over revealed truth. Whilst emotions are wonderfully woven into the fabric of our humanity, capable of reflecting both the beauty of joy and the anguish of sorrow, they are not reliable guides for truth. Our feelings, though deeply felt, are often misleading, shaped by circumstance, frailty, and always stained by sin. And although scripture never instructs us to suppress our feelings, it likewise never directs us to be governed by them.

Time and again, David wrestles with fear, grief, and a sorrow so deep it nearly overwhelms him, Psalm 6:6-7, Psalm 13:1-2, Psalm 22:1-2, Psalm 38:6-8, &c., all of which paint a vivid and sobering picture of David’s inner struggles with depression and unbelief. Despite David’s fluctuating mindset, Psalm 55:19, and tendency to wear his grief upon his collar, II Samuel 12:16-17, his constant cry was to the Lord. We see this pattern over and over again, “as for me, I will call upon God; and the Lord shall save me. Evening, and morning, and at noon, will I pray, and cry aloud, and he shall hear my voice.” Psalm 55:16-17.

David gave voice to the whole range of human emotion as he unburdened himself before the LORD, but not as a man dominated or controlled by them, but likewise, not as a man in control of them either, or one able to manipulate them at leisure, but rather driven by them to God. Why art thou cast down, O my soul - hope thou in God, for I shall yet praise him, &c. Psalm 42:11.

What often began in sorrow would end in praise, not because his circumstances changed, but because his gaze was shifted from himself to the LORD, and his mind realigned through truth. He cries out, not as one mustering resolve, but as one whose thoughts have been redirected. Psalm 119:130. His tears became prayers, his cries expressions of trust, and his sorrow a path by which he was being brought into a deeper understanding of grace, and a more intimate acquaintance with the God of all comfort. II Corinthians 1:3. I will be glad and rejoice in thy mercy, for thou hast considered my trouble; thou hast known my soul in adversities. Psalm 31:7.

In a world marked by instability, where feelings dictate reality and all truth is personalized, the Word of God remains the unyielding standard by which all claims must be tested, all feelings brought into subjection, and all truth discerned. May it please the LORD to awaken us afresh to the unparalleled authority of Scripture. MPJ

Some thoughts on mental health and modern-day psychology. Before proceeding, let me just say that I’ve not written this to dismiss or belittle the reality of mental and emotional suffering. The pain is real. The anguish that some experience is profound. But this is precisely why the subject deserves serious examination, not through the lens of popular culture or secular thought, but through the unchanging light of God’s Word. Is it possible that in our well-meaning attempts to help, we have unmindfully adopted a system of thought that neither begins with God nor ends in Christ? Far from attacking those who suffer, but challenging the systems we have come to trust, we ask whether the modern mental health movement, often cloaked in compassion, is, in fact, leading people further from the only source of true healing. Can we afford to ignore the ways psychology has redefined the human condition, reshaped our vocabulary of sin and guilt, and subtly replaced the gospel with self-help?

Also, I’m not suggesting all forms of counseling are inherently wrong. There is certainly a place for offering wise, compassionate, and biblically grounded guidance to those who are struggling with some difficulties in life, &c., but the comfort we offer must be grounded in the truth, not in man’s attempts to understand the soul, but in God’s unchanging Word, which alone can bind up the brokenhearted. Isaiah 61:1. Likewise, mental health is undoubtedly a real struggle for many, if not most, at some point in life; but once again, true and lasting wholeness (“ye are complete in HIM,” Colossians 2:10) comes not by way of human reasoning, (which can only diagnose but never deliver,) but through the truth of God’s Word, and the life & light of Christ, in whom alone is found a balm sufficient for every sorrowing heart and mind distressed by sin. He alone is the true physician of souls, who speaks peace where none else can. “Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee.” Matthew 9:2.

Without drifting too far from the main point, I can’t help but observe something I may have overlooked until now in these words of Christ, particularly as it speaks to the realm of mental health, for what could be greater in this life than the forgiveness of sins? What greater comfort could there be in this life than the assurance that one’s sins are forgiven? No wonder Christ says be of good cheer! Sounds to me like this forgiveness of sins might be worth inquiring after, (which is a bit difficult to imagine in this day when the forgiveness of sins & salvation are looked upon as ‘on-demand’ entitlements, and the mercy of the Lord in Christ is panhandled in such a flippant and irreverent fashion, as if pardon were indiscriminately handed out like tracts on a street corner,) instead of seeking our council from those who perhaps have never trembled under the authority of holy scripture, nor rejoice in the grace of Christ, &c., who know nothing about the true nature of their disease, Isaiah 1:5-6, and even less in reference to the only cure. Numbers 21:8-9 / John 3:14-15.

It seems like over the years, and It’s been a long and wondrous journey, Genesis 24:1, I would like to think that the LORD has brought me to the point in my life where it has become undeniably clear to me that Scripture alone, apart from tradition, addition, or the reasoning of man, is the final and sufficient authority in all matters, not only concerning salvation through Christ, but also all things in an absolute sense, things present and things to come. Scripture alone lays bare the true condition of our hearts, exposing the depths of our corruption, the blindness of our self-deception, and the hardness of our unbelief, whilst confronting us with the undeniable truth that we are utterly powerless to save ourselves. Ephesians 2:1.

That the Bible alone contains all we need for life, godliness, salvation, and spiritual truth, which is otherwise known as the sufficiency of scripture, is clearly taught in God’s word. Every competing authority, whether it arises from tradition, psychological insight, or philosophical reasoning, &c., must be tested by and subordinated to the Word of God, and subjected to its supreme authority in all things. In sum, to affirm the sufficiency of Scripture is to take God at His Word, that He has not spoken in vain, nor left His people without light, truth, or guidance. It is to rest wholly upon what is written and to reject all that would add to, detract from, or stand alongside that word as a rival authority. “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.” Deuteronomy 4:2.

The Bible is not a partial or supplemental guide; it is a complete and finished revelation concerning all that pertains to life and godliness. II Peter 1:3. This knowledge comes through Scripture alone. John 17:17. This has led me to decisively turn away from secular psychology, as well as the misguided attempt to fuse it with biblical truth under the label of ‘biblical counseling. Only God’s Word exposes the true condition of the human heart, Jeremiah 17:9, which is not merely dysfunctional but spiritually dead apart from Christ. Ephesians 2:1. Psychology often frames man’s problems in terms of trauma, low self-esteem, or unfulfilled needs. Scripture teaches that man’s core problem is sin. Self is not to be pampered, but put to death. Galatians 2:20. Again, and this cannot be stressed enough, man’s problem is sin; his need is redemption; and his cure is Christ. Christ is the answer to man’s deepest needs, and His Word is enough.

Any system that displaces or diminishes Christ as the sole physician of souls or seeks to intrude upon the domain that belongs to the Word of God alone must be looked upon or treated as a rival gospel. “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men…and not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8. Many psychological models suggest that man’s primary need is self-esteem, self-affirmation or personal peace, solutions which can be attained through human effort, reflection, or therapeutic technique, offering, in essence, a kind of self-salvation through mental or behavioral reform. In doing so, they trade the piercing truth of God’s Word for self-congratulatory introspection, and the redemptive power of Christ for the illusion of personal deliverance. Instead of sin, they diagnose trauma, imbalance, or low self-worth. This subtle exchange displaces Scripture from its rightful throne and places man at the center. II Thessalonians 2:4. Sin is explained away or redefined as a psychological malfunction rather than a moral offense against God, as nothing more than a mental health issue, some form of neurosis or psychosis; ss if rebellion against God were a disorder to be treated, rather than a sin to be repented of and forgiven through Christ. When sin is no longer acknowledged, everything must be reinterpreted without reference to guilt, repentance, or grace. As this ideology gains ground within our thoughts, the Word of God and the cross of Christ are inevitably displaced.

As I attempt to close these thoughts, I would be negligent not to briefly mention another spectrum of this subject, just as disturbing, which is the idea that a person’s behavior, thoughts, and emotions are primarily the result of their upbringing, social environment, or past traumas. In a broader sense, it’s part of what’s known as the victimhood mentality, which within a short period of time has essentially taken over the way people interpret human behavior, redefining sin as sickness, and dressing it up in psychological terminology. Repentance is replaced with therapy, and man is seen as wounded instead of wicked. It is a subtle yet sweeping denial of accountability before God! Whilst Scripture doesn’t deny the influence of one’s environment or upbringing, it never excuses sin on that basis. Instead, it calls all people, regardless of background, to repentance and faith, Acts 17:30, recognizing that the root issue is the heart. Jeremiah 17:9. Mark 7:21-23. Deny guilt, and you nullify grace! By denying one’s guilt, a person renders grace meaningless or unnecessary, because grace only applies to the guilty. If you’re not guilty, you don’t need grace, you don’t need Christ, and the gospel becomes a needless message. “When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, they that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick; I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.” Mark 2:17. I believe the implications here might be greater than we realize! Think about it, there is no greater peril to the soul than seeking relief from its miseries anywhere but in Christ. “For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.” Jeremiah 2:13. MPJ

Reading the book of Ruth with my wife last night, I couldn’t help but notice how openly and unreservedly Naomi attributes all her afflictions, and indeed every circumstance of her life, directly to the LORD Himself. She so vividly portrays the mindset of one who was resting in the unwavering belief that God governs everything with absolute precision. “Be still, and know that I am God, I will be exalted.” Psalm 46:10. Trusting, albeit at times falteringly, (through bitter tears and shattered hopes,) that His ‘hand’ (unseen, yet sure) governs all things in perfect wisdom and love; that behind every famine and funeral, &c., stood the LORD, working all things together for good, for His name’s sake and according to His eternal counsel. That no sorrow was without purpose, and that every step, whether forward or backward, is appointed by Him who sees the “end from the beginning.” Isaiah 46:10. What seemed like the unraveling of her hopes was, in fact, the unfolding of a divine plan, every step, even into famine and loss, was appointed by Him whose greatest blessings often arrive disguised in hardship.

Does this mean she was consciously comforted by God’s care in the midst of her trials? Of course not, but she was given grace to believe that each bitter turn had been measured and ordained for a purpose that reached far beyond her own story. She was persuaded that her afflictions were not random misfortunes, but divinely appointed mercies in disguise, designed to unfold His redemptive purpose not only in her life, but in the lineage of the Messiah to come. This still and settled confidence that the Most High rules in the kingdom of men and in the affairs of His saints, Daniel 4:17, is that which gladdens the heart, (“thou hast put gladness in my heart,” Psalm 4:7,) even when all seems chaotic and unpredictable, resting in the certainty that nothing comes by chance, but that He ordains all things for His glory and for the good of His people.

Naomi saw HIS ‘hand’ (“who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the LORD hath wrought this,” Job 12:9,) behind every circumstance, whether joyful or grievous, and acknowledged Him not merely as permitting events, but as actively ordaining and governing all things for His own wise and glorious purposes. By God’s grace she saw God’s will in every circumstance and traced His hand in the smallest matters. Moved by the report of divine mercy, “the LORD had visited his people in giving them bread,” Ruth 1:6, she leaves Moab behind, returning to Bethlehem under great loss, and incapable of disguising her grief, or silencing her faith, she says, “the Almighty hath afflicted me.” Ruth 1:21. She bows before the Lord, once again acknowledging God’s hand in every detail of her life, whether joyful or sorrowful, and that everything which had befallen her was under His wise and watchful care. Our steps are not aimless! (“A man’s heart deviseth his way, but the LORD directeth his steps.” Proverbs 16:9.)

I particularly love her confession of faith from the first chapter. “And she said unto them, Call me not Naomi, call me Mara, for the Almighty hath dealt very bitterly with me. I went out full, and the Lord hath brought me home again empty; why then call ye me Naomi, seeing the Lord hath testified against me, and the Almighty hath afflicted me.” Ruth 1:20-21. Seldom is God’s control over affliction so plainly and humbly confessed. Naomi traces her emptiness not to fate or human failure, but to God Himself, not with bitterness against Him, but again, with a recognition that He is the one who governs all things. Naomi lived with a profoundly God-centered view of all things. Famine, death, harvest, kindness, all are attributed to the active hand of the Lord. Like Job, whose heart bowed beneath the weight of loss, Naomi echoed that same confession of faith, “the Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord.” Job 1:21.

If we are Christ’s, then her journey is written into ours, and is indeed a reflection of our own in so many ways. Marked by both joy and sorrow, triumph and trial, fullness and want, is one we all walk in some form. Philippians 4:12-13. And in that shared path, we see the unchanging pattern of God’s dealings with His people, pressing them low that He might lift them up, stripping away what fades that they might cling to what endures. “And thou shalt remember all the way which the LORD thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep his commandments, or no. And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.” Deuteronomy 8:2-3. We are companions in grace, fellow heirs in Christ, bound by the same hope and led by the same hand. Truly, “thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God.” Ruth 1:16.

Thinking along these lines, I’m struck with a thought so wonderful it borders on the indescribable. Just as Ruth, though born a Moabite, was included in God’s eternal purpose and became an ancestor of Christ according to the flesh, so we too, once strangers and aliens, Ephesians 2:12, were openly brought into that which was eternally ours in Christ. “That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world.” Ephesians 2:12. From Ruth came Christ in the flesh; from Christ come we in the spirit. “And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ.” Romans 8:17. A truth woven throughout the Scripture. “Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.” Galatians 4:7. What a thought!

We are getting ready to read Ruth chapter 4, (the last chapter,) and I have a confession. I already peeked at the ending, which closes with this genealogy. Obed becomes the father of Jesse, who is the father of David, establishing the royal lineage that ultimately leads to Christ, for in the end, all things are divinely ordered to lead us to Christ, who is the Alpha and the Omega, the sum and center of all God’s purposes. “And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:11. MPJ

In The Glory of Christ Unveil’d or the Excellency of Christ Vindicated, Joseph Hussey presents a deeply Christ-centered, high-grace perspective of the Lord Jesus Christ, exalting His person and work in a manner that reflects both the majesty of His divine nature and the richness of His mediatorial office. At the heart of Hussey’s Christology is the eternal covenant of grace, where Christ is revealed as the divinely appointed Head of His people, predestined from eternity to act on their behalf as Surety, Representative, and Redeemer. He insists that Christ’s work was not a general provision for all, but a definite and effectual substitutionary satisfaction for the elect alone. Hussey emphasizes Christ’s eternal identity and uncreated majesty as the Son of God, and marvels at the condescending grace by which He assumed our nature – without sin – so as to fully represent His people in their nature. He strongly affirms the impeccability and active obedience of Christ, insisting that Christ’s perfect righteousness is imputed to the believer, and His sufferings were a real, substitutionary satisfaction to divine justice. Hussey rejects any notion of a universal or conditional redemption, seeing such a view as diminishing Christ’s glory and impugning the sufficiency and intention of His work. Instead, he emphasizes the sovereign design and infallible effect of Christ’s death, maintaining that the salvation of all for whom He died is certain. He speaks of Christ as the Alpha and Omega of salvation, appointed by the Father, anointed by the Spirit, and worshipped by the saints as their Redeemer and King. His tone throughout the work is one of reverent exaltation, urging the reader to see by faith the unveiled splendor of Christ in His offices as Prophet, Priest, and King. Christ’s intercession, His reign over all things for the church, and His certain return in glory are all handled with thoughtful spiritual insight. Above all, Hussey insists that to diminish Christ’s glory to any degree, whether by making salvation depend in part on man, or by softening the distinctions of election and reprobation, or by denying the particularity of Christ’s atonement, (making it a vague provision rather than a definite purchase for the elect,) &c., is to cast a veil over the glory of the Redeemer’s finished work, to undermine the very foundation of grace, and to ascribe to man what belongs to Christ alone as the sole Author and Finisher of salvation. Thus, Hussey’s doctrine of Christ is far more than theological formulation; it is deeply devotional and exalts Christ as the crucified and risen Lord in whom all the believer’s hope, holiness, and heaven are found.

In conclusion we will summarize by saying that Hussey’s Christology emphasizes: The eternal mediatorship of Christ. The union of the elect with Christ from eternity. A definite atonement that secures salvation. The declaration of redemption, not its offer, and a strong insistence of Christ’s person and work as the center of all theology. The whole purpose of creation, providence, redemption, and the Gospel is to exalt the glory of Christ. “The glory of Christ is not only the glory He receives, but the glory He reveals.” MPJ

“Who are they that will have to appear before the throne of judgment? All. The godly will not be exempted, for the apostle here is speaking to Christians. They covet the judgment, and will be able to stand there to receive a public acquittal from the mouth of the great Judge. - Note the word “appear.” No disguise will be possible. Ye cannot come there dressed in masquerade of profession; off will come your garments. Oh, what a day that will be when every man shall see himself and his fellow, and the eyes of angels, of devils, and of God upon the throne, shall see us through and through! - What will be the rule of judgment? Not our profession, our boastings, but our actions. This includes every omission as well as every commission. Matt 25:1-46. All our words, too, will be brought up, and all our thoughts, for these lie at the bottom of our actions and give the true color to them good or bad. Our motives, our heart sins, shall be published unreservedly. “Well,” saith one, “who then can be saved?” Ah! indeed, who? Those who have believed in Jesus. Rom. 8:1. “That every man may receive the things done in his body.” 1. The Lord will grant unto His people an abundant reward for all that they have done. Not that they deserve any reward, but that God first gave them grace to do good works, then took their good works as evidence of a renewed heart, and then gave them a reward for what they had done.” CH Spurgeon

Okay, a disclaimer! I’m not in the habit of reading or quoting Spurgeon, and I only came across this because I was looking for some thoughts on the teaching of rewards, and I suppose that I found them, in this, to me, an unlikely place? Who besides myself after reading the above paragraph about a future judgment for believers where all their thoughts are revealed and exposed to a gainsaying world, and rewards meted out on the basis of those works which the LORD worked through them is ready to crawl under a rock and die? Psalms 119:120.

What if Nathan the prophet after informing David, {penitent and broken before the LORD, as freshly awakened to the enormity of his transgressions, “I have sinned against the LORD, &c.,”} that “the LORD also hath put away thy sin,” II Samuel 12:13, that this putting away of sin was only a temporary transaction, but that at some future date all his sins would once again be brought to remembrance? David's sin, along with the sins of all the elect of God are put away! “For by one offering he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified.” Hebrews 10:14. They are not swept under the rug, not conditionally retained, not shelved for later reconsideration, nor set aside until some future tribunal when they all are resurrected under the scrutinizing ‘eye’ of HIM “with whom we have to do,” Hebrews 4:13, but fully, finally, and forever removed.

“As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.” Psalm 103:12. This verse is a declaration of the absolute and irreversible removal of sin from God’s people. The phrase “as far as the east is from the west” communicates infinite separation. Unlike north and south, which have fixed poles and endpoints, east and west never meet, which conveys not merely forgiveness in a limited or temporary sense, but a complete, eternal, and irreversible putting away of sin. Isaiah 53:6 declares, “the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.” The result is not partial pardon or the possibility of future condemnation, but full satisfaction of God’s justice.

In John 5:24, Christ declares that the one who “heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.” This speaks of a present possession of eternal life and a decisive transfer from judgment to life, already accomplished. It’s not just a future hope, but a present reality. He says such a one “shall not come into condemnation.” Not now, not ever! Why? Because the believer has already passed from death unto life. The judgment due for sin has been fully borne by Christ, and the transfer is complete. “But now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” Hebrews 9:26. There remains no wrath, no curse, no unfinished business. The elect, for whom Christ died, will never face judgment for their sins, because those sins were judged at the cross. The believer’s justification is settled, eternal, and irreversible.

“There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.” Romans 8:1. “No condemnation” means the legal verdict of ‘guilty’ no longer applies. If there is no condemnation now, there can be no condemnation later. Final judgment for sin has already been executed at the cross, on CHRIST, their Surety. Hebrews 7: 22. Justice was satisfied at the cross! This is a gospel declaration of forensic finality. The sins of the elect have been judicially removed, cast behind God’s back, plunged into the depths of the sea, and separated from them eternally by the infinite span of east from west. To speak of future judgment for such sins would be to impugn the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement and to deny the finality of His priestly work. Matthew 1:21.

From the cross, Christ proclaimed, “it is finished.” John 19:30. Nothing remains unfinished! Judgment was borne in its entirety, sin was put away, and righteousness was secured, for all on whose behalf Christ gave Himself. The work there was forever settled. “Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth.” Romans 8:33. Christ’s work, as foretold in Daniel 9:24, was to “make an end of sins.” Not merely to cover them temporarily, but to remove them entirely for those He redeemed. Colossians 1:14. He made reconciliation for iniquity by fully satisfying God’s justice, leaving no wrath remaining. And in doing so, He brought in everlasting righteousness, a righteousness that forever clothes His people. With sin dealt with, peace secured, and righteousness established, how can there remain any future judgment for those whose sins have been put away?

“Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered. Blessed is the man unto whom the Lord imputeth not iniquity.” Psalm 32:1-2. This is not a temporary covering, but an eternal acquittal, consummated at the cross and sealed in resurrection glory. What David saw in part, we now behold in fullness, the blessedness of the one whose sins are not imputed, for they were imputed to Christ. I Corinthians 1:30. So may we sing with David, “blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered,” Psalm 32:1, for in Christ, this blessing is ours in its fullest measure.

Talk about amazing grace! Our transgressions have not merely been overlooked, they have been fully judged in the person of our Substitute. Our sins are not merely hidden from view, they are put away forever by the blood of the Lamb. John 1: 29. Sin has been transferred, and expiated through blood. Expiation means sin is removed, its guilt blotted out, not hypothetically but in actual satisfaction of justice. At the cross, every sin was covered, every drop of wrath satisfied, and judgment fully executed. For those trusting in Christ, the verdict is already in. “Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.” Matthew 25:34. MPJ

Some fragmentary thoughts regarding the nature of God. The divine nature of GOD eludes the grasp of our finite language and mental frameworks; GOD exists so far beyond our comprehension, surpasses all human expression and understanding. How can the mind even begin to comprehend the boundless nature and existence of ONE who has no beginning and no end? How can we explain the mystery of GOD becoming man? How can the eternal ONE who fills all things be confined to time and space, yet lose nothing of His infinite essence? God’s truth is boundless and infinite, perceived but dimly, and only as “it is given” in sacred flashes of divine revelation, “to know” - that which alone is worth knowing, Luke 8:10 - “that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.” I John 5:20.

That which is known in theology as traditional trinitarianism, (which I’ve not fully embraced in over 30 years,) though almost universally swallowed by nearly all of Protestantism and Romanism alike, as a system formulated under the guise of fidelity to Scripture and adherence to divine revelation, has perhaps done more to obscure “the record that God gave of his Son,” I John 5:10, than to define it within the parameters of that which has been revealed. “The secret things belong unto the LORD our God, but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.” Deuteronomy 29:29.

Before I make the few remarks that I hope to, let me preface this with these thoughts. There seems to be a real danger of interpreting scripture through the lens of creeds and confessions, or historical and ‘reformationial’ movements of the past, whereby we unwittingly bind ourselves to the theological conclusions of men (treating the doctrinal insights of fallible men as infallible truth) rather than to the living voice of God in His Word. This can result in a rigid mindset that automatically filters out anything that comes in conflict with our perception of truth, which if delved into in any measurable sense, might just devolve the fact that often it’s not “our” perception at all, but that of another, which may come in a way of a ‘gospel’ teacher, ‘church’ affiliation, historical persuasion, &c., and thus what we hold as ‘sacred’ may in fact be secondhand, borrowed convictions, II Kings 6:5, only explored in a copyist sort of way, as the mind becomes a vault of inherited opinions rather than an empty vessel desiring to be filled. “O send out thy light and thy truth, let them lead me; let them bring me unto thy holy hill, and to thy tabernacles.” Psalm 43:3. We all tend to settle in and rest in the ‘safety’ and conclusions of others that we esteem are “over us” in the Lord, but this ‘bed’ may perhaps be a tad shorter than what we can stretch ourselves on? Isaiah 28:20. The inherited persuasion or doctrinal confidence that we may receive from a gospel teacher, no matter how highly regarded or seemingly sound they may be, may not be sufficient to warrant the idea that this person is correct on every ‘essential’ point of doctrine. Let’s not presume that simply because a messenger of the gospel is shod with gospel shoes, Ephesians 6:15, that he is therefore infallible in the scripture, nor should we suppose that our own grasp of truth is flawless as we ‘construct’ our confession of faith.

With that brief introduction, and another reminder that GOD exists so far beyond the limits of our debilitated comprehension, and the fact that attempting to comprehend the manner of His existence would be like trying to gaze into the light of the sun of ONE, Malachi 4:2, who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see, to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.” I Timothy 6:16. In fact, I believe it’s a true thing that the more we attempt to gaze upon “the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ,” II Corinthians 4:6, the more we’re instantly overcome by the infiniteness of that glory having only been given such small glimpses of that which sometimes overwhelms our thoughts as our eyes are opened to the scriptures, Luke 24:32, and “the Revelation of Jesus Christ,” Revelation 1:1, “who is the image of the invisible God.” Colossians 1:15. This makes every truth He has chosen to reveal about Himself in the Scriptures exceedingly precious as we are left with no alternative but to recognize that divine revelation sets the boundary for all true knowledge of God, and underscores the necessity of humbly abiding within the framework and bounds of that sacred revelation, lest we darken counsel by “words without knowledge.” Job 38:2.

Historically and according to their confessions, textbook trinitarians, those adhering to the classical formulations of Nicene and post-Nicene orthodoxy, affirm that the one true God exists eternally as three distinct persons. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. All three are said to share fully and equally in the one undivided divine essence or substance, in a manner that each person is fully God, yet not three gods, but one God. The persons are distinguished not by essence or nature, but by eternal relations of origin. The Father is unbegotten, the Son is eternally begotten of the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father. I think that would be a fair and honest evaluation of their belief system, which I believe was mostly designed to safeguard both the unity of the Godhead and the full deity of each “person,” and additionally functions as a theological line of demarcation, marking the bounds of orthodoxy within the historic traditions of both Protestantism and Catholicism. For some, a failure to conform to this trinitarian formulation is tantamount to heresy of the worst sort. Those who dare to dissent are instantly branded as heretics, excommunicated, and consigned to the outer margins of what they deem as “the true church.”

According to both our present understanding and what we have thus far seen in the scriptures, this confession undermines the Bible’s clear affirmation to both the absolute oneness of God and the full, undiminished deity of Jesus Christ. The Bible clearly and unquestionably teaches the doctrine of the oneness of GOD and the absolute deity of Jesus Christ with decisive clarity and force. “I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.” Isaiah 44:6. “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” Revelation 22:13.

Nicene Trinitarianism by introducing eternal distinctions of “persons” within the Godhead, inevitably compromises the fundamental biblical truth that God is one, not merely in essence, but in undivided identity. “The Lord our God is one Lord.” Deuteronomy 6:4. This is not a unity of three persons, but a singular, indivisible Being. By asserting that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are co-eternal, co-equal persons with distinct centers of consciousness or will, Trinitarianism introduces a form of plurality into the divine nature that the scriptures nowhere supports. This division of persons risks implying a committee of divine beings rather than the one, solitary, and sovereign LORD revealed in Scripture. Moreover, this framework undermines the true deity of Jesus Christ. Instead of affirming that the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily in Christ, Colossians 2:9, Trinitarianism often presents the Son as a second person within the Godhead, subordinate in role, and, in practical emphasis, sometimes viewed as derivative or lesser in majesty. This depersonalizes and obscures the glory of the incarnation by suggesting the Father sent another divine person, but Scripture says God came Himself. “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness, God was manifest in the flesh.” I Timothy 3:16.

Christ is not merely a divine person among others; He is the express image of the invisible God, Hebrews 1:3, the Alpha and Omega, Revelation 1:8, and the full embodiment of the Godhead in bodily form, Colossians 2:9, in whom dwells all the fullness of Deity, making Him not a part of God but the very revelation of God Himself. Any doctrine that draws eternal lines between Father and Son as separate persons inherently clouds this glorious truth and risks relegating Christ to a partial or representative deity, rather than fully affirming Him as the one true God. “I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.” Isaiah 43:11. “I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me.” Isaiah 45:5. ”And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.” John 20:28.

Creedal Trinitarianism claims to uphold the full deity of Christ, yet it does so at the cost of distinction, placing Him as the “second person” of the Trinity, subordinate in role if not in essence. This introduces confusion, contradiction, and unnecessary complexity into the doctrine of God. Is Christ truly and fully God in Himself, or is He always dependent upon another divine person to define His deity? Christ does not merely represent God, He is God incarnate. “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God… and the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us.” John 1:1,14. To say that God is Three is simply to affirm what He has revealed of Himself. He is as truly Three as He is One. Attempts to systematize this mystery using unscriptural terms and philosophical distinctions only lead to confusion, pride, and division. God is not to be dissected by human logic, but worshiped in the light of what He has made known. Let us therefore hold fast to the testimony of Scripture, where God is revealed as eternally ONE, and yet distinctly as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. These are not three gods, but the one true GOD revealing himself in a threefold manner.

Overall we cannot but believe that in some ways traditional trinitarianism divides the Godhead, weakens the fullness of Christ’s deity, and imports philosophical categories foreign to the Scriptures. It offers a mystery not grounded in biblical revelation, but in the post-apostolic attempts to explain God through human categories. The Bible reveals one indivisible God who has made Himself known as Father in creation, Son in redemption, and Holy Spirit in illumination, not three eternal distinctions, but one true God revealed fully in Jesus Christ, the express image of His person and the only Saviour.

Just in case anyone is wondering, yes, I wholeheartedly believe in the Holy Spirit, but not as regulated to a third independent person that somehow eternally proceeded from the Father, but as GOD Himself. This describes what God is, John 4:24, as it emphasizes God in action or God’s own divine essence in active expression. The Spirit is not a distinct person within a triadic committee, but the very breath of God, Genesis 2:7, the power of God, Luke 1:35, the mind of God, I Corinthians 2:11, and the presence of God in and among His people. John 14:17,23. To assign the Holy Spirit a separate “personhood” as defined by these confessions is to fragment the indivisible oneness of the only true God. The Spirit is the Lord Himself at work, and wherever He is, God is. “Now the Lord is that Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” II Corinthians 3:17. This is not a third party; this is God. The Scriptures know nothing of a tritheistic hierarchy where the Spirit is cast as a coequal being beside the Father and the Son. He is the extension of God’s being, not a division within it. Just as our spirit is not another person apart from us, so the Holy Spirit is not a third divine individual, but the living, active self-expression of the one true God. To speak of the Spirit is to speak of God Himself, not another, but the same divine essence by which God accomplishes His will. “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.” Colossians 2:8-9. MPJ

Although I concluded my last post about Satan with something along the lines of “I’m moving on” from this subject, here is something that caught my attention whilst looking up the various mentions of Satan in the Old Testament (whose name = “the accuser” or “the adversary,”) which seemed worth mentioning. I'll be brief.

In the Old Testament there are 15 verses referencing Satan, and outside the Book of Job, Satan is mentioned directly in only two other Old Testament passages, which are these: First Chronicles 21:1, where Satan incites King David to take a census of Israel, which results in Divine judgment, “and Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.” The other place is Zechariah 3:1-2, where in a prophetic vision, Satan stands accusing Joshua the high priest before the Angel of the Lord, “and he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him. And the Lord said unto Satan, The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan.”

All the other references to Satan are found in the book of Job, quite easily actually, as all of them are found in the first two chapters of that book. Job 1:6-12, where Satan presents himself before the LORD and challenges Job’s motives. Job 2:1-7, where Satan again appears and afflicts Job with painful sores. Just mentioning this in passing to say that without a doubt Job contains the clearest and most sustained narrative involving Satan in the Old Testament, where he appears not as an independent force or autonomous agent but as one functioning solely within the framework of Divine sovereignty.

In the narrative of Job Satan is expressly authorized and empowered by GOD to afflict Job. What I find most noteworthy about all this is the fact Job never once blames Satan for his afflictions. Instead, he consistently acknowledges that his suffering came from the hand of the LORD alone, as purified by the operation of grace, and sanctified unto a greater glory than his own, for he worshiped a living REDEEMER, and the Lord God Almighty was his name, (“for thy Maker is thine husband; the LORD of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; the God of the whole earth shall he be called,” Isaiah 54:5,) and that this same GOD and not another, (“I and my Father are ONE,” John 10:30,) would so “stand at the latter day upon the earth,” Job 19:25, “to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness.” Daniel 9:24.

After losing his children and his possessions, he declares, “the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.” Job 1:21. Job doesn’t attribute the loss to Satan, but directly to the LORD. When his wife urges him to curse God and die, he tells her, “shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?” Job 2:10. Again, Job attributes his suffering to God’s hand, not to any malevolent being. After Job’s restoration when came unto “him all his brethren, and all his sisters, and all they that had been of his acquaintance before, and did eat bread with him in his house, and they bemoaned him, and comforted him over all the evil that the LORD had brought upon him.” Job 42:11. Scripture confirms that it was the LORD who brought these trials upon Job, and that Satan was merely a means to an end and that end being nothing less than the glory of God in Christ Jesus. “And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:11. In the theology of Job, Satan is no autonomous actor, but one utterly subject to the decree of GOD. MPJ

Born of Water: In my Bible reading, I just came across John 3:5, where Christ says to Nicodemus, “verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” The next verse, “that which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit,” reminded me of why I believe, contrary to most, that the water referred to in the previous verse is simply and metaphorically speaking of physical/natural birth as so distinguished from that which is communicated by the Spirit of God as spiritual life in Divine Quickening.

It seems as a though Christ was speaking in terms that Nicodemus should grasp, (“art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things,”) which to me sounds like he’s referring to natural birth (water) and spiritual birth (Spirit), both of which Nicodemus ought to have understand in a theological framework.

Taken together, the grammar, context, cultural background, (in Jewish and Greek thought “water” was associated with birth - e.g., the breaking of water in childbirth) and the flow of our Lord's dialogue with Nicodemus I believe support the interpretation that “born of water” refers to natural birth, and “born of the Spirit” refers to the supernatural act of divine quickening, without experiencing both, one cannot enter the kingdom of God.

I know that there are good arguments for a different interpretation of this water, and I’m certain that at one time I held to the popular calvinistic interpretation of the water being synonymous with the word, (as may be deduced from Ephesians 5:26, Titus 3:5, John 15:3, I Peter 1:23,) but ever since so called gospel regeneration was demolished in my mind, and I began to trace these scriptures to their fountainhead in CHRIST, not in a sense of generating life but rather a maintaining / sustaining / nourishing that life in Christ by the word, Matthew 4:4, this interpretation of the ‘water’ has been riveted in my mind. MPJ

Last week, I came across an introduction to what I think was to be a series on the book of Revelation, from a gospel preacher in England that started talking about the kingdom of Satan being the kingdom of this world, and then there was the kingdom of God, wherever that might be? There was far more said about the ‘kingdom’ of the devil, being in his thoughts the one who reigns in this world as sort of a sub-contractor or surrogate of God, than “the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ.” Revelation 12:10.

Unless satisfied with that which has been traditioned down to us by the 'church' have not some of us mused in profound wonder over the exact question that GOD directed to Satan when he appeared on that day among the sons of God, “and the LORD said unto Satan, whence comest thou?” Job. 1:7. Where indeed did Satan come from? Or perhaps, thinking more comprehensively, and in the ‘language’ of the serpent, “why hast thou made me thus?” Romans 9:20. Why did the LORD who “made all things,” Proverbs 16:4, and “created all things” for his own pleasure and glory, (“for of him, and through him, and to him, are all things, to whom be glory forever,” Romans 11:36, “thou art worthy, O LORD, to receive glory and honour and power, for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created,” Revelation 4:11,) form this one, Job 26:13, whom the scripture refers to as Satan, meaning, “adversary” or “accuser”? Why did “the LORD that created the heavens; GOD himself that formed the earth,” Isaiah 45:18, to be inhabited in the precise manner in which it is, formed and fashioned in accordance within his exact perimeters, and conducted in perfect conformity to his will in all things, Psalms 135:6, create the serpent? Genesis 3:1. “Who knoweth not in all these that the hand of the LORD hath wrought this? In whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind.” Job 12:9-10.

Debilitated by my own inability to discern truth from error, fact from fiction, myth from folklore, &c., on this subject matter of the serpent, satan, lucifer, &c., or under whatever designation is given him in the scriptures, or in the annals of religious mythology, I’m reluctant to say much, (believing this to be one of the greatest spiritual mysteries of all,) but as there seems to exist in many of our thoughts this dualistic mindset that the devil exists independently as some sort of a cosmic agent intent on destroying humanity, whilst thwarting the plans of the Most High GOD, I think it might be helpful to “gird up the loins” of our mind, I Peter 1:13, and think soberly, or in proportion to that “measure of faith,” Romans 12:3, and grace as given to us in Christ, Ephesians 4:7, as we turn the few thoughts that we have to this one that is figuratively depicted as making the earth tremble and shaking its very foundations. Isaiah 14:16. This one who “was given” the script to speak blasphemies “against GOD,” to profane “his name,” &c., and “given” the power to continue “for a time, and times, and half a time,” Revelation 12:14, in a perpetual warfare “with the saints,” being those that have “the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Revelation 12:17. “And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them, and power was given him over all kindreds and tongues, and nations.” Revelation 13:5-7.

‘Satan’ is almost universally regarded as the source of all that is perceived as evil or harmful in the world, whilst GOD is seen as the source of all that is good and beneficial. In this distorted and dualistic view ‘Satan’ is depicted as some sort of a rival opponent of GOD, who is engaged in a type of perpetual mutiny whereby he and GOD are locked up in a sort of a life and death struggle with the outcome seemingly teetering in the balance and on the verge of unraveling the ‘powers’ that be. II Chronicles 20:6. This is the essence of dualism, a heretical framework shared not only by many pagan religions but tragically embraced, in some measure, by most professing “Christians” today, who somehow assert that the devil acts autonomously or independently of the LORD.

According to the traditional theological framework constructed by such early “church fathers” like Augustine, Tertullian, Origen, and Jerome, &c., (and later moralized according to puritan ideals in Milton’s Paradise Lost, where it is whitewashed in calvinistic rhetoric by saying it was all part of God's plan,) who all blended human reason with divine revelation, especially in their interpretation of Isaiah chapter 14, which to them needed to be read like a cosmic comic book, not merely about the king of Babylon, (possibly Nebuchadnezzar II, who conquered Jerusalem, destroyed the First Temple, and exiled much of Judah to Babylon,) but as an allegorical reference to some fairy-tale-like fall of Satan, whom they believe was some sort of a high-ranking member amongst the angelical clergy, (renowned for his unmatched beauty and extraordinary wisdom,) whose pride one fateful day finally got the ‘best of him’ as he rebelled against GOD and fell from his lofty position as the “heavenly choir director” to that of a groveling serpent intent on causing as much havoc and destruction as possible, whose arrogance, pride and rebellion serve as a sobering warning to any that would follow in his footsteps.

This, with some variation, represents the prevailing notion held by most who identify as Protestants, Romanists, or otherwise, &c., as there seems to be a general consensus concerning this luciferian fable whereby for the last 2000 years of so-called church history this “fallen angel” and “cosmic adversary” has kept “mankind at bay,” as a god in his own right, II Thessalonians 2:4, ruling in the affairs of men, as some sort of a supreme despot, responsible for all that has gone ‘array’ in this ‘broken’ world, as all humanity is suspended in a ‘divine’ standoff between the forces of good and evil.

We read of a group of religious folks in Romans chapter 1, who held the “truth in unrighteousness,” Romans 1:18, and subsequently exchanged the truth of the glory of the incorruptible GOD for a lie, by worshipping and serving the creature more than the Creator,” Romans 1:25, which sounds a bit like what Christianity has done with their dazzling and fallen cherub, now extolled and universally recognized as the triumphant captor of nearly the entire human race, whose divine powers and attributes are second only to GOD, Revelation 13:4, and as now hailed and “transformed into an angel of light,” II Corinthians 11:14, universally lauded as the grand adversary of the ALMIGHTY, whom God must unceasingly outwit lest all of creation is derailed by this creature of His own making.

This entire concept of GOD creating a perfect angelic being with a “free will” to defy HIM or deliberately plant within His own creation an inherent capacity and potential ability to rebel, sounds all too familiar? This is the very scaffolding upon which the entire Arminian system is built, a system saturated with the same flawed reasoning that elevates human autonomy above the sovereign and unassailable decree of the “MOST HIGH GOD,” Genesis 14:19, as it's retrofitted to match the ‘fall’ of Satan, so as to exuberate God from all evil and sin in the world, being all aware of the universal law of the church world whose code of ethics absolutely forbids GOD from bringing about sin, evil and destruction in the execution of His eternal purpose, who seem to keep forgetting the simple fact that if there exists anything beyond God’s absolute control, then God is not God. (Is there any power other than the Almighty? A more terrifying thought I can scarcely conceive of!)

If we are suggesting that GOD created a good being but did not foresee his descent into evil, then we are saying the devil outmaneuvered God! If the devil acted in a way that caught God off guard, or deviated from a path God had not ordained, what assurance do we have he won’t do so again? Such fleshly logic is not simply flawed, as it is blasphemous, striking at the very heart of God’s absoluteness and sovereignty! Is it somehow more palatable to say God gave a creature the capacity to become ‘evil’ than to say HE ordained the existence of this evil?

Satan is our adversary, not God’s, which I believe is no minor point, but a vital distinction which must be kept in mind. Additionally, he was created a murderer, (not an angel,) and a liar from the beginning. John 8:44. His very nature from the beginning, was that of a liar, a deceiver. His domain is not the heights of heaven, but the soil of man’s fallen nature, Job 2:2, as he slithers about the carnal and corrupt appetites of men, seeking whom he may devour. I Peter 5:8.

Sin, death, and the devil exist as divinely ordained instruments, created by GOD for the sole purpose of exalting His glory through the triumph of CHRIST over them. Philippians 2:11. GOD, in His sovereign and unsearchable wisdom appoints both life and death, light and darkness, good and evil, truth and falsehood, &c., as necessary ingredients in his eternal design to display and magnify his power and glory. How would ‘good’ even be recognized if there was no evil? Something derives its meaning only in contrast to its opposite. How could any speak meaningfully of light, or how could light be distinguished from darkness if there was no darkness? What value would health hold if sickness had never afflicted us? How about life and death? Without the dark contrast of sin and corruption, the sheer radiance of righteousness and holiness would be veiled and unvalued. For it is against the backdrop of man’s depravity that the purity of God’s character shines most illustriously. Just as light is most glorious when it pierces the deepest darkness, so too the majesty of divine holiness is most deeply revered when seen in stark contrast to its counterpart, especially in relationship to the gospel of Christ, Romans 5:20-21, and our valuation of “him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,” Revelation 1:5, as our eyes are measurably opened to the profound nature of sin from which we are redeemed in Christ. 'But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ.' Ephesians 2:5.

What, then, is Satan’s work? In a real and sobering sense, it is the very work of GOD, executed under divine compulsion in complete subjection to Christ, Matthew 28:18, and confined by eternal parameters “according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” Ephesians 1:11. If Satan has the ability to act autonomously, that is, independently of God's purpose and decree, then the entire framework of divine sovereignty collapses and we are left with two opposing and rival deities, each with their own sphere of power. It goes without saying that such a notion is not only untenable but is a direct assault on the absolute supremacy of the MOST HIGH. “For thou shalt worship no other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.” Exodus 34:14.

However vague and undefined our conception of God’s serpent may be, we can with some absolute certainty reverberate the words spoken by God to Pharaoh, as unquestionably applicable to Satan himself, “and in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth.” Exodus 9:16.

Just rereading this to check for spelling mistakes, and I can clearly see that I've opened more questions than given answers, but I'm ready to move on, and perhaps use these preliminary thoughts for my own personal starting point in exploring more of what the scriptures say on this matter. May it please the LORD to grant us a measure of discernment in these things and not be as those who have succumbed to a theological conclusion that elevates to a god-like status, this one whom the LORD cursed. Genesis 3:14. “To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ forever. Amen.” Romans 16:27. MPJ

Some brief thoughts on Gospel Experience in a letter to a friend: We mentioned the (hyper) experimentalism of some British Baptists who somehow have figured out a way to make an ax head to swim, II Kings 6:6, which in my thoughts would be equivalent to imagining that a corrupt tree can somehow bring forth good fruit, Matthew 7:18, regardless of how they may label them as ‘gracious’ affections and stigmatize those as ‘dead letter' calvinists who cannot quite “ascend into” their imaginary heights in bringing ‘Christ’ down to their experience. Romans 10:6-8. I’m fairly certain that the ‘christian’ life is not measured and does not consist in morbid introspection but in the Spirit's testimony to CHRIST. John 16:15. The Spirit’s work is to exalt Christ, (our identity in relationship to our feelings will decrease, as Christ is lifted up,) not to cultivate self-awareness.

Those thoughts that a ‘spiritual’ man (“ye which are spiritual,” Gal.6:1,) thinks in his mind, those heavenly affections, Colossians 3:2, which at times enrapture his heart, (which David no doubt felt when he “danced before the LORD with all his might,” II Samuel 6:14,) are inseparable and form one experience. It’s called living “by the faith of the SON of GOD,” Galatians 2:20, and not upon our own resources, no matter how we may attempt to spiritualize them by backpedaling the scriptures in order to conform them to our ‘experience’ of Christ. It is the whole of man who thinks, feels, and experiences the grace of Christ, and these things are inseparable! Believers worship & love GOD with their heart, soul, mind & strength, Mark 12:30, in the totality of their being, which forms, as it were, an inseparable unity, and any attempt to isolate or elevate one aspect over another can only lead to error and confusion.

Our ‘lostness’ cannot be overstated! Affections tainted, feelings inverted, desires misplaced and ‘voices’ that sound all too similar like our own, &c. This is no time to be trusting in our feelings or seeking the way of truth through sensory experience. Besides, as believers it’s impossible to be stoic about Christ and the gospel of our salvation! Our love, (the “love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord,” Romans 8:39,) our joys, (our “joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ,” Romans 5:11,) our peace, (our “peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,” Romans 5:1,) and whatever else may constitute our life in Christ by which the LORD sustains us, John 6:35, in the totality of our being as we abide in HIM. I John 2:24-28.

The believer’s experiences, as delineated throughout the scriptures, consist chiefly, and are always intertwined with the written word, and inextricably linked to the gospel, and the belief of the truth. It's experience that is fed, governed, and amplified by the word of the Lord as opened to our understanding by the Spirit of Truth, and elevated in the energy that accompanies the power of the gospel, Romans 1:16, unveiling CHRIST as articulated in the word, whilst saturating our hearts in love. John 14:21. MPJ

New Pope: Question: “Did you hear that they elected a new pope, and that he's an American?” Answer: That’s interesting! It's all religion to me! Roman Catholicism is its own religion, just as is Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism or the Muslim faith, &c. The one thing in particular that makes this man-made religion all the more abominable than its pagan counterparts is the detestable fact that it parades itself throughout the world under the false banner of Christianity, when in fact it is the exact opposite, a religion of antichrist with a pope as its head! Romanism, alternatively known as “MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH,” Revelation 17:5, has been from its pagan roots and throughout its accursed history, in its masquerade of what the world calls Christianity, (from our ‘impaired’ perspective, Hebrews 2:8,) the greatest ‘enemy’ of the true gospel in existence, as “the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk” with this toxic mixture, Revelation 17:2, and are satisfied to call it Christianity, being “tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine,” Ephesians 4:14, which “the breath of the LORD, like a stream of brimstone, doth kindle,” Isaiah 30:33, in the earth in order to demonstrate the fact that man cannot, Jeremiah 10:23, formulate his own way to GOD. Though not one for religious labels, as in “protestant,” (not protesting anything, Psalm 46:10,) name or no name, it's impossible not to hate something that so blasphemes the name of CHRIST, Psalm 139:21, and not to unashamedly cry out against her atrocious practices, teachings and manifold idolatries. This may be a good time to remind ourselves that the papacy is the “seat of the beast,” whose ‘kingdom’ is full of darkness, Revelation 16:10, and that ‘antichrist’ might be closer than we think. “Little children, it is the last time, and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.” I John 2:18. MPJ

Surgical Scribes: Last week a friend attempting to navigate through a fog of calvinistic conditionalism mentioned how in dialogue with one of their chieftains, Matthew 23:2, when attempting to question what seemed to be a message in total antithesis to the ‘grace gospel’ being promoted by their website, &c., made this statement in his defense. “Brother, there are five phases to God’s dealings and relationships with His children, and they easily explain what we may initially think are contradictions.” There are five phases to God's dealings? That's hilarious! How are we sure that there are not any more? These are indeed some spiritually deep waters that so very few know absolutely anything about? So thankful for these 'guides' that can point the way! What would we do without them? II Kings 7:3-4. But really, who comes up with this stuff? Difficult not to mock this sort of hacksaw 'christianity' as some surgical scribe compartmentalizes the scriptures to his own presets. Sad fact is that the religion of man is full of this sort of human logic blended with the language of scripture, and let's face it, the “people love to have it so.” Jeremiah 5:31. Talk about limiting the limitless ONE with a witness! MPJ

Allow me to share a ‘reformed moment’ with you from earlier this week, as I think it was on Monday driving to work in the morning, when I generally tap into, for better or worse, the sermon audio site. Their featured sermon or message of the day was by some ‘reverend’ from a Protestant Reformed Congregation entitled the “Conclusion of God's Law.” I decided to give it a spin, after all, I love God's law, and I know that Christ is the conclusion and fulfillment of that law, so of course, I'm interested, let's hear what this guy has to say?

Needless to say, I knew before he uttered his first word, that unless in this message he abandons his confession of faith, leaves his congregation, and outright denies his reformed heritage, &c., that I would most likely not agree with everything he has to say, but regardless of how we agreed or disagreed on certain tenets of “the faith,” Jude 1:3, it was hoped that we both, and all listening to this message, would at least be somehow directed to that straight gate and that narrow way which leadeth unto CHRIST, Matthew 7:14, but unless I’m completed confounded on the basic ABC's of Christianity, I'm fairly certain that somebody missed a major signpost at some point along the way, which actually is not that difficult to see it all, for it clearly reads this: “FOR THE LAW WAS GIVEN BY MOSES, BUT GRACE AND TRUTH CAME BY JESUS CHRIST.” John 1:17.

My comment regarding the message was short but enough perhaps to grab someone's attention. (Apparently it did because it was deleted a few hours later.) My title to the comment was: REFORMED CHRISTIANITY AT ITS BEST! And the comment was, “what an eloquest message by this one representative of what the world calls reformed christianity! It's a mockery of the grace of Christ, and the gospel of free justification. Congratulations on adequately hacksawing God's Holy Law into little fragments so that we can all keep whatever remains of it, and by stripping the Law of all its sanctions, and then calling the 'death' of Christ a provision.”

I mentioned the ABC’s of Christianity, because it's difficult to understand how this can be missed, as the contrast between LAW and GOSPEL are so clearly delineated in the scriptures. The law, one law, as such was “given by Moses,” John 1:17, and was “added because of transgressions, till the SEED should come to whom the promise was made.” Galatians 3:19. The law was “not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient.” I Timothy 1:19. Believers are “dead to the law by the body of Christ.” Romans 7:4. “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” Romans 10:4. It points invariably to HIM; it terminates wholly in HIM who has obeyed its every precept; sustained its entire penalty; and satisfied all its requirements. Matthew 5:17. The Law as a schoolmaster drives us to God’s mercy which is found nowhere but in Christ alone, and after that faith / CHRIST is come, “we are no longer under a schoolmaster.” Galatians 3:24.

Additionally, it is unambiguously declared that believers are dead with Christ, and that their life is hidden “with Christ in God.” Colossians 3:3. They have been “delivered from the law,” being legally joined to him that is risen from the dead, Romans 7:4, and now serve the Lord “in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.” Romans 7:6. “For sin shall not have dominion over you, for ye are not under the law, but under grace.” Romans 6:14. In Colossians we discover that Christ blotted “out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross,” Colossians 2:14, so that it can no longer be seen or read unto condemnation “to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” Romans 8:1. Again, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law.” Galatians 3:13. Either we are under it or we are not under it! There is no middle ground! Deuteronomy 12:32. It is impossible for anyone to be under only a part of the Law! James 2:10.

The truth is that righteousness does not come by the law at all, under any circumstances, or by any scheme. No, it comes by the gospel, it stands exclusively in the death of Christ, and it is called “the righteousness of God without the law.” Romans 3:21. The law is referred to as a “killing letter,” II Corinthians 3:6, and “administration of death,” II Corinthians 3:7, it gives the “knowledge of sin,” Romans 3:20, it pronounces a “sentence of death,’ Romans 7:24, it “worketh wrath,” Romans 4:15, it was “added because of transgressions,” Galatians 3:19, it’s called the “oldness of the letter,” Romans 7:6, the “strength of sin,” I Corinthians 15:56, as it stops every mouth, and brings in “all the world guilty before God.” Romans 3:19. “The law made nothing perfect.” Hebrews 7:19. “The law is not of faith.” Galatians 3:12. Where is the disconnect? It's either a salvation that is based upon Law keeping or upon the Law Keeper! This is not rocket science! It's as plain as the nose on your face! I'll go as far as to say that I'm fairly certain that it doesn't even require any depth of thought or special revelation, as truth has a way of defending itself almost effortlessly, whilst error (in the sense of a fallacy, misconception or delusion) and falsehood (in the sense of an intentional act of deception, where someone knowingly presents untrue information,) both require much attention, constant maintenance and frequent reinforcement.

This would certainly explain all the fuss about Catechisms and Confessional Classes prior to formal church membership, (as if somebody could join themselves to the ‘body’ of Christ,) and let’s not forget about all the theological seminaries and bible colleges which are all necessary ingredients in order to prop up this ‘faith’ and maintain the reformed tradition. It's sort of like “beating the same dead horse” over and over again and getting nowhere closer to Christ. Galatians 5:4. In one sense, it’s nothing more than reformed folklore! Religious traditions and beliefs that are passed on through generations by confessions and creeds, and now in this day, as the ‘floodgates’ of reformed theology have opened, and new disciples (“Moses' disciples,” John 9:28) are born in rapid succession each day, Isaiah 37:3, it becometh us “who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit,” Romans 8:1, who “rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh,” Philippians 3:3, to “not sleep, as do others” but “watch and be sober,” I Thessalonians 5:6, “lest Satan should get an advantage of us, for we are not ignorant of his devices,” II Corinthians 2:11, and to be made aware lest we too be spoiled “through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.” Colossians 2:8.

I'm without doubt mistaken about many points of scripture, but it's impossible to be mistaken about the clear distinction between the law and the gospel unless you are blinded by tradition, and have some bias towards this “theological clock” that in the reformed mindset stopped running either in 1561 (Belgic Confession of Faith) or 1646 (Westminster Confession of Faith) and like a mechanical wristwatch that has been overwound has stopped working altogether. “Woe unto you, lawyers, for ye have taken away the key of knowledge; ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.” Luke 11:52.

This tenacious deathgrip to the law despite the clear testimony of scripture, must be a bit like infant baptism I suppose, a papist stronghold that those of the reformed movement refuse to relinquish at whatever the cost! Acts 28:27. After all it's chiseled in stone as embedded in their 400 year old confessions & catechisms, (Moses himself wouldn't be able to break one of these tablets, Exodus 32:19,) which we know can't be wrong as they define ‘the faith’ of their fathers, &c., in the reformed tradition. It’s something you have to really want to see in the scriptures in order to make it appear, which may in one place be called ‘wresting’ the scripture unto your “own destruction?” II Peter 3:16. Thank the LORD that he “knoweth them that are his,” II Timothy 2:19, those that may be found within their circles, a poor and afflicted people that are calling upon the name of the LORD, Zephaniah 3:12, who have been brought unto ZION “to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.” Hebrews 12:22-24.

Indeed, what once was veiled and transient, like the fading glory on Moses' face, has now been revealed in full, permanent brilliance in Christ, Matthew 17:2, a glory not merely reflected, but intrinsic to Christ as the eternal Son of God. “For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.” II Corinthians 4:6. “This is the true God, and eternal life. Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.” I John 5:21. MPJ

A Gospel Sage: Who are we to audaciously question some who undoubtedly have been indoctrinated in the ways of Christ, perhaps even 'pillars' of some ‘grace’ community, 'prophets' in their own estimation, and diviners of all matters relating to the scriptures? Those who have convinced themselves that they have some private ‘keys’ to the kingdom which can unlock almost every door, some v.i.p. pass to access the ‘inner court’ and who have already determined to not allow the scriptures to get in the way of their theology, bottling up the ‘water of life’ for their own consumption, to be dispensed as needed in reaffirming their own biblical correctness, as they ‘childproof’ the scriptures from “the simplicity that is in Christ.” II Corinthians 11:3.

A friend just recently mentioned sending one such individual a short paper questioning his position on a particular aspect of biblical ‘truth’ that he himself saw a bit differently, but decided to opt out. Sounded like a good idea to me! Why unsettle our own thoughts, and burden our minds in attempting to 'correct' those who differ from us in matters that do not directly affect the gospel? Especially those who have elevated themselves above the scrutiny of all “in the camp” II Peter 1:1, or “outside the camp” Revelation 22:15, in pretending to possess some innate ability, not only in all matters relating to the gospel of Christ, but everything contained in the scriptures (under the banner of it's christocentric embodiment,) which if questioned would be equivalent to ‘gospel’ suicide.

Not sure why this comes to mind now, but a few months ago I sat ringside to a short FB debate on some theological point, which conversation was ended with these lines, which I copied down because it seemed like such a thoughtless affirmation, but more so because it came from one whom I regard (not that my opinion matters) as one that loves Christ. “I sent you the list of scriptures that the Lord used in my own heart to bring me to see this truth, so for you to say that it is false, is to deny the very work of the Spirit having taught me and the clear testimony of the Scriptures. I would be very careful.” I won't spend the time to pick that statement apart at this moment, but needless to say, acting like some ‘gospel’ sage is never a good idea! I truly wish some of these individuals the ‘best’ in whatever way the LORD carries them along, especially if CHRIST is preached. Philippians 1:18. With that in mind, should we even be ‘correcting’ everyone's theology? Everyone is a pope in their own thoughts, so easily upset if others do not recognize their ‘divine’ authority, their ‘office’ in the ‘church’ or their unique insight in expounding the scriptures. We know what we know, and no one can rattle our belief system, as deep within we have persuaded ourselves that we are right and everyone else is wrong, regardless of what pious glaze we put upon our own ignorance! Every once in a while as the mental fog dissipates we may indeed get small glimpses of the fact that we are all completely in the hand of the LORD, “in whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind.” Job 12:10. Ultimately, “the deceived and the deceiver are HIS,” Job 12:16, but so are the “holy” and the “peculiar,” I Peter 2:9, and what glorious consolation lies therein! “And an highway shall be there, and a way, and it shall be called the way of holiness; the unclean shall not pass over it; but it shall be for those, the wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein.” Isaiah 35:8. Christ is our wisdom! I Corinthians 1:30. In consideration of the fact that this is thankfully all out of our hands, we are forced to return to our dust-like mentality, Job 30:19, 42:6, in realizing that the ‘light’ of Christ cannot be switched off and on. All true knowledge of the CHRIST of scripture comes to us, (regardless of any attempts on our part to enlighten ourselves,) via divine revelation! Revelation 3:7. Nothing more, nothing less! “For with thee is the fountain of life, in thy light shall we see light.” Psalms 36:9.

Along those same lines I was just thinking about many that almost seem to enjoy debating the scriptures, whereas I've always been afraid of such confrontations, and generally hide, as it's almost 100% guaranteed that I’ll lose, if there are even any winners or losers in such debates. Some are so persuasive, impressive and clear minded, whereas I'm none of those things, and generally all too easily confounded. Besides, I've always been afraid of that sort of thing, as it would expose my shallowness in so many theological matters, and, let's face it, who wants to look stupid? We all want to be seen as high rollers, whatever our field of expertise may be! But some are really good at debating theological matters and smart at making their opponents look dumb. II Timothy 2:25.

One has to wonder though, at what point do you cross over to the other side of the fence when answering a fool according to his folly, (“answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him,” Proverbs 26:4,) or giving that which is holy unto the dogs? “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.” Matthew 7:6. Let's not make mincemeat of the Bible in chopping it into little theological pieces for everyone to chew on or barter away the truth of the Gospel in such a ramshackle way.

Debating the absoluteness of GOD, sovereign divine predestination, efficacious grace & calling unto CHRIST, HOLY SPIRIT ‘regeneration,’ the oneness of GOD, the DEITY of the SON, the perfection of holy scripture, free justification by the blood and righteousness of CHRIST alone, absolute and effectual redemption at the cross, the complete insignificance, valuelessness and futility of man, &c., these and other inseparable gospel presuppositions are clearly delineated in the scriptures of truth, and to some measure, (“according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith,” Romans 12:3,) recognizably discerned as revealed to the elect in every generation. Mark 4:11-12.

In some sense, there is nothing to debate! It has all been settled by the gospel of Christ. Let's stop pretending that we are Peter or Paul, going about and contending for the truth of the gospel at a time when there was no official canon of Holy Scripture. That was then, this is now! Now we have a “more sure word of prophecy,” II Peter 1:19, and “that which is perfect is come,” I Corinthians 13:10, as the light of CHRIST in the gospel has been revealed to his own. “At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes. Even so, Father, for so it seemed good in thy sight.” Matthew 11:25. With all our carefully polished theological terms, scrutinous exegesis and refined hermeneutics we will never turn a goat into a sheep, or a tare into wheat! In one very real sense we are all shipwrecked on the shore of God's absolute decree which has its eternal center in the blessed Person of our LORD and SAVIOUR Jesus Christ.

Besides, so many of these parochial disputes have been hashed out over the eons of so-called church history, but once the record stops spinning (often stuck in the same theological groove for ages) and the sound begins to fade, we're all too often left with nothing but “a bag with holes.” “Ye have sown much, and bring in little; ye eat, but ye have not enough; ye drink, but ye are not filled with drink; ye clothe you, but there is none warm; and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes.” Haggai 1:6. Overall I suppose there is a place for debating the truth of holy scripture, especially if it's in defense of the Gospel, Philippians 1:17, but only if the debates are not held in Capernaum! “And he came to Capernaum, and being in the house he asked them, what was it that ye disputed among yourselves by the way? But they held their peace, for by the way they had disputed among themselves, who should be the greatest.” Mark 9:33-34.

In a reference to those that are squabbling outside the lines of the gospel in attempting to remove everyone's right ear, John 18:10, for the least ‘infraction’ it might be well to refresh our memories to the fact that all those that belong to CHRIST are sincerely seeking the same thing, which is his glory! It's inevitable, and it's that bond which cannot be broken regardless of man's attempt to split it with his theological ax! Romans 16:17. MPJ

Spurgeonism, &c., in a letter to a friend. Hello brother, first and foremost, thanks again for being my friend. Sorry to hear of your bodily afflictions, which makes my struggles seem trivial! Anxious thoughts in reference to aging all too frequently unsettle the mind as constant reminders of our “body of this death,” Romans 7:24, are apparently needed, Psalm 119:67, and faithfully dispatched, Isaiah 42:16, in a such a meticulously proportioned and merciful manner in order that we might retain our place, Psalm 46:10, as sheltered under the 'wings' of the ALMIGHTY. Ruth 2:12. “The LORD is thy keeper, the LORD is thy shade upon thy right hand.” Psalms 121:5.

Since the subject line of your return letter had my original title still attached, (C.H. Spurgeon,) I should take a minute to confess my confusion in regards to this ‘great’ individual, Luke 6:26, as my thoughts on Spurgeon or Spurgeonism have fluctuated over the years, and I'm back to the basics! The basics of honoring the scriptures above men at whatever the cost! What turned the scales was the fact that I just came across his validation of John Wesley again, (endorsing his brother-in-arms Wesley as a true disciple of Christ, II John 1:10-11,) I say again, because I'm sure I've read it a dozen times, but this time I was left speechless in my mind.

Here is the quote: “There is no soul living who holds more firmly to the doctrines of grace than I do, and if any man asks me whether I am ashamed to be called a Calvinist, I answer, I wish to be called nothing but a Christian; but if you ask me, do I hold the doctrinal views which were held by John Calvin, I reply, I do in the main hold them, and rejoice to avow it. But far be it from me even to imagine that Zion contains none but Calvinistic Christians within her walls, or that there are none saved who do not hold our views. Most atrocious things have been spoken about the character and spiritual condition of John Wesley, the modern prince of Arminians. I can only say concerning him that, while I detest many of the doctrines which he preached, yet for the man himself I have a reverence second to no Wesleyan; and if there were wanted two apostles to be added to the number of the twelve, I do not believe that there could be found two men more fit to be so added than George Whitefield and John Wesley.” (CHS, “A Defense of Calvinism,” extracted from his autobiography.)

There is so much that could be said about this, which I'll have to pass by for the moment, but what even are these so-called “doctrines of grace” that he is referring to? I suppose it's what he calls Calvinism? Somehow in his deluded mind he piecemealed “the doctrine of Christ” into doctrines, which one with no real love to the truth can randomly discard ‘willy-nilly’ without any real consternation, which might explain this derision of CHRIST? “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God.” II John 1:9. Is it possible to rejoice in the language of the gospel, and not the gospel itself? Men ‘tubbed and scrubbed’ in the way of ecclesiastical churchianity, eager to fetch unto themselves notions of gospel truth, who themselves are not fetched or apprehended by the power of the truth, (“apprehended of Christ Jesus,” Philippians 3:12,) can easily relinquish that which never ‘cost’ them anything in the first place. {“Alas, master! for it was borrowed.” II Kings 6:5.}

The gospel, or the language of the gospel can be learned. Not that any of the catechisms or confessions of faith that are parroted around in any sense define or can contain the gospel, but just think, how many people learn those catechisms, subscribe to those confessions, make a profession of faith, and then, if really serious as enamored with their discoveries of biblical truth or the “doctrines” of grace as they are called, become your next pastors, preachers and elders, &c., and the show goes on and on, year after year, generation after generation, as the ‘form’ or ‘shell’ of Christianity has sustained itself for almost 2,000 years. Incredible show!

Speaking the ‘language’ of holy scripture is relatively easy, and so it comes as no surprise when we see JW's on the street corner denying the ‘breath’ of their existence, John 1:4, or Arminians trampling the blood of Christ under their feet, Hebrews 10:29, &c., but when we hear a so-called gospel minister, a well indoctrinated writer, or whoever, speak so definitively of the grace of Christ, the gospel of our salvation, sovereignty of divine grace, justification in Christ, &c., and whatever else becometh “sound doctrine,” Titus 2:1, in terms so definitive, and passionately clear, how can we not be so completely boggled in our minds and confused in our thoughts as in wonderment we just can't understand how this can be? That anyone indoctrinated into the way of Christ, “sealed” with the “holy spirit of promise,” Ephesians 1:13, whose eyes has been measurably opened to the glory of redemption, the preeminence of Christ in all things, the absoluteness of GOD and salvation by grace alone to so easily relinquish or compromise the Gospel by giving credence to that which is so blatantly heretical, (Arminian Conditionalism,) and ‘break bread’ with those that scoff and ridicule the absoluteness of all which CHRIST finalized on the cross? Voluntary affiliation with error is a condonation of it, and the sheer fact that one would treat with such contempt that (the truth of the Gospel) which should be more precious than life itself, speaks volumes as to our valuation of Christ, as the two are inseparable! “Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.” II John 1:9.

Of this we can be most certain, which is that Christ never revealed anything to men that derogates from his own glory, or that which obscures his own preeminence in all things, Colossians 1:18, and although we may all be confused about countless things that are revealed in the scriptures, outright confounded at times as we navigate its pages, and undoubtedly mistaken regarding many portions of God's word, &c., but of this we can be also most certain, that regardless of what understanding we may or may not have been given, in whatever “measure of faith,” Romans 12:3, that has been allotted to us “according to the measure of the gift of Christ,” Ephesians 4:7, that faith (the “faith of God’s elect,” Titus 1:1 = “an understanding” to “know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ; this is the true God, and eternal life,” I John 5:20,) will look to CHRIST for all of salvation, all of life, and nowhere else. “Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth, for I am GOD, and there is none else.” Isaiah 45:22. This is that “one mind” (“that ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,” Romans 15:6,) that all those “sanctified in Christ Jesus” have in common; the “common faith” as we have it in Titus 1:4, to “call upon the name of JESUS CHRIST our LORD.”

With this in mind we are reminded of the fact that no one can say that “JESUS is the LORD,” in the most absolute and all comprehensive sense “but by the Holy Ghost.” I Corinthians 12:3. In a very real sense the “whole” apostate “world,” Revelation 12:9, as deceived, Jeremiah 50:6, and deceiving, Jeremiah 14:14, deny this cardinal truth - “JESUS is the LORD” - when they deny his DIVINITY and ONENESS with the FATHER, either outright by mutilating the scriptures “to their own destruction,” II Peter 3:16, (“and the people went about, and gathered it, and ground it in mills, or beat it in a mortar, and baked it in pans, and made cakes of it, and the taste of it was as the taste of fresh oil,” Numbers 11:8 = a good description of how those that have “giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils,” I Timothy 4:1, treat the scriptures,) and so deny that JESUS is LORD in his person, or by insinuating in any sense that the work of Christ was not sufficient enough to “finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness,” Daniel 9:24, to fully satisfy the justice of GOD for all those for whom he died, (“I am the good shepherd, the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep, John 10:11,) as a substitutionary sacrifice, (“the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me,” Galatians 2:20,) by which “he hath perfected forever them that are sanctified.” Hebrews 10:14.

In summation, when God “saves” a person, he gives that person a knowledge of both the PERSON and the WORK of Christ. This is inseparable! This revelation of Christ, if I may call it that, is that which assimilates your life, so that in one very real sense you may more easily pluck out thy own “right eye,” or sever your own limbs, Matthew 5:29, than to ‘part’ with the truth of the gospel, or in treating it with such contempt by embracing those that hate the LORD, and calling them brethren, regardless of their “apostolic wesleyan demeanor.”

Well dear brother, that is far more than I had intended to write, which explains the long delay, as I think of you not only when we speak “one to another” in these infrequent communications, Malachi 3:16, but daily as we congregate together around the gospel of our salvation as positioned in the death of the Substitute. “Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great GOD and our SAVIOUR JESUS GOD.” Titus 2:13.

From your last, I love this confession when you write, “focusing on my unworthiness and lowliness can take my eyes off of the fact that in Christ, I am perfect and holy. That, I find incredible! I love reading Scripture and seeing the impossible demands of God throughout Scripture and knowing that in Christ, I am credited with all of those glorious accomplishments and qualities, though I possess none of myself.” Wow, that’s a loaded statement, to which I say AMEN, how else could we otherwise live! MPJ

Calvinistic Conditionalism: A letter I just sent to a friend, which perhaps may be helpful to others entangled in a ‘works’ oriented ‘gospel.’ Hey brother, I'm so sorry that I have not replied, but it's kind of your fault, because you mentioned a particular website, which I've always felt very uneasy about, but without any apparent reason, so I thought I should perhaps think about it a little bit more closely, and my thoughts sort of carried me away. One thought led to another, and I started jotting some things down. I'm glad I did, because it seems like most of the things I write, I write principally to myself, which in a way clarifies my own thoughts about ‘gospel’ matters, and as enabled to keep these things in remembrance. II Peter 1:12. So yes, the delay is for the fact that my mind was sort of fixated on that, and since I'm such a slow writer, and have such little time these days, I thought I would wait until after I completed it before writing back, your friend in Christ.

This website that you mentioned is one that I am familiar with, but really, I don't think I've read much of their stuff, (at least in the past 10 years,) as it seems a bit too textbook christianity for me. Interestingly enough, I just started receiving the updates from a dear friend who often posts materials from other authors on his website feed, and just recently he posted some articles about the church by this one guy, who I know is a disciple of that ‘movement’ who posted, what I thought, some of the worst possible articles on the relationships that a church should have to its pastor. It was complete Protestant Priestcraft no matter how you slice it up. In one place he mentioned something about how the members of the church needed a pastor to instruct them, because they were incapable of discerning the ‘truth’ for themselves. That’s a laughable statement! With that sort of a romanish mentality it's no wonder that the sheep are scattered, Ezekiel 34:12, and as scattered more easily snatched up by such as would make “merchandise” of them, II Peter 2:3, by confining them within their own “scripturally” structured belief systems, from which to stray in even one point would be almost unthinkable, and tantamount to apostasy. These essentially exist in a closed ‘gospel’ system, constantly reinforcing their own “theological correctness” to the exclusion of everyone else, except those within their own immediate circle of fellowship.

Perhaps things are different now, but when I first discovered their website, probably about 10 years ago, I read a few things here and there, and moved on almost immediately. Much sound gospel teaching, and as I recall, some exceptionally well researched, and often unique topics, &c., a ‘confession of faith’ much like ‘my’ own, but intermingled throughout with a spirit of authoritarianism, legality, exclusivity, &c., as sifted through a dialog of grace. Galatians 5:1. Toss in some forced compliance to a ‘gospel’ decorum, and some paid cleric telling everyone how to live the christian life, (or in other words, to live just like he pretends to live,) and you have disciples at best. (Gospel taskmasters differ little from those of the reformed community. Both like to broadcast their ‘living’ standards, and delight in telling the rest of us how to live.) In essence it's an entire Arminian substructure, built up around calvinistic principles, as so-called morality is substituted for Christ. Since when has the LORD forgotten them that are his? Those that name “the name of Christ depart from iniquity,” II Timothy 2:19, and don't need moral guide posts at every street corner to tell them what to do. II Corinthians 5:14.

In truth, everybody knows the difference between right and wrong, and we don't need a bible theologian to tell us the obvious! If that's all we need, let's all join the fundamentalist baptist movement, so that we can all glory together in our shame, Philippians 3:19, (the shame of glorying in their destruction of the true message of the gospel,) and “make a name” for ourselves. Genesis 11:4. I would like to think that most of us have had enough of this throughout our lives? Speaking for myself, I can without any hesitation say that I've chiseled enough brick and mortar to last me a lifetime, Exodus 1:14, and I would think that it's nearly impossible at this point for anyone who “knows his own bitterness,” Proverbs 14:10, and by faith has glimpsed even just “the hem” of Christ's “garment,” (is “made perfectly whole,” Matthew 14:36,) to revert back “from the grace of Christ,” Galatians 1:6, “unto vain jangling,” I Timothy 1:6, (empty talk as severed from Christ,) and return to a brick and mortar mentality, as this would be like attempting to build again those things which have been destroyed. Galatians 2:18. Not wise! “Remember Lot's wife.” Luke 17:32. Impossible! “Behold, he breaketh down, and it cannot be built again.” Job 12:14. “Let him that is in the field not turn back again for to take up his garment.” Mark 13:16. “For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in GOD.” Colossians 3:3.

Do not all present-day legalists uniformly reject the principle of a spiritual life lived in Christ, (“Christ, who is our life,” Col 3:4,) otherwise known as the law or principle “of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus.” Romans 8:2. Man-made religion has the principle of legalism / conditionalism at its core, as the seeds of legalism run deep in all of us by nature, even as we attempt to incorporate those principles into our profession / persuasion of grace. We all equally revolt against the truth of a spiritual life lived in Christ, by Christ and upon Christ, from first to last, to receive him every day, (“as ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord,”) as he was received the first day, ever conscious of this fact, that we have nothing to bring him, (“nothing in my hands I bring, simply to thy cross I cling,” Toplady,) our last day on earth, in a way of commendation than the first day we heard his blessed name. “Naked came” we all out of our “mother’s womb” and naked” shall we all “return thither,” Job 1:21, is a divine principle of life, naturally and spiritually. I think it was Luther who said, “when I look at myself, I do not see how I can be saved, but when I look at Christ, I do not see how I can be lost.” That’s the story of our lives!

The justified live by faith and only by faith, Hebrews 10:38, which can be faithfully transcribed “live by Christ and only by Christ.” If you define the christian life by anything else, you will find yourself in a works gospel, or risk falling into legalism. We ought to obey and follow Christ in everything we are constantly being told, but since when has that even been an option? Believers do obey and follow Christ, who’s giving us options here? “If a man love me, he will keep my words.” John 14:23. Where is the disconnection here between the life of a believer and the life of Christ? If we love Christ, sin will be our greatest enemy! This can’t be undone! The two are inseparable! May we never look at obedience as something that we bring to the LORD, but rather that disposition of mind and heart that he brings to us, as all things are from him, to him, and unto him - the Spirit of God working within us “both to will and to do of his good pleasure.” Philippians 2:13.

The LORD directs all our steps, and I trust he knows what he's doing. If we can trust him with our salvation, from first to last, I'm sure we can trust him with our morality or whatever you want to call it. Unlike “a bullock unaccustomed to the yoke,” (or as one unacquainted with the gospel of Christ, of all spiritual blessings and heavenly truth laid up in Christ, &c.,) all believers, (called “out of darkness” and “into” the “light” of Christ, I Peter 2:9,) are being turned continually unto the LORD. “Turn thou me, and I shall be turned; for thou art the LORD my God,” Jeremiah 31:18, and here the last is first, as our ever turning towards Christ for everything, (in salvation, grace & time,) is indicative of the fact that the LORD is our GOD. “It is written in the prophets, and they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.” John 6:45. All that the Father giveth unto Christ cometh unto Christ, which isn’t a one time reckoning or some ‘conversion’ experience, having little to do with our initial quickening, but everything to do with our life in Christ daily, as we look to him for all things.

If “he that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much” Luke 16:10, then it’s an undeniable fact that GOD who is altogether faithful, Deuteronomy 7:9, and especially, (if I may even so speak, as “thy faithfulness reacheth unto the clouds,” Psalm 36:5,) in the great matter of our redemption, Hebrews 1:3, then we can believe with some certainty, I Thessalonians 5:24, and rejoice (ultimately “because our names are written in heaven,” Luke 10:20) in confident expectation of this “very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ.” Philippians 1:6. Doesn't he save everyone to “the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.” Hebrews 7:25. How do we dismember that all inclusive gospel declaration? Why would we want to? What or who can possibly “separate us from the love of Christ?” Romans 8:35. “He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things.” Romans 8:32.

The LORD keepeth me. “The LORD is thy keeper.” Psalm 121:3-4. “He will keep the feet of his saints.” I Samuel 2:9. “Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation.” I Peter 1:5. Perhaps we are forgetting that Christ's garden is enclosed? Song 4:12. The LORD is my keeper! That's good enough for me! I'm not out to impress anyone or pretend to be something that I'm not. At the end it all comes down to this anyway, “by the grace of God I am what I am,” I Corinthians 15:10, and for those of us who “have learned of the FATHER,” do continually, always and only to come to Christ. John 6:45.

These days I don't dabble much in confessions of faith, but when it comes to a confession of my hope of being kept in the faith of Jesus Christ, (“faithful is he that calleth you, who also will do it,” I Thes.5:24,) I'm making this entire Psalm my charter. Psalm 121. “I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. My help cometh from the LORD, which made heaven and earth. He will not suffer thy foot to be moved, he that keepeth thee will not slumber. Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep. The LORD is thy keeper, the LORD is thy shade upon thy right hand. The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night. The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil; he shall preserve thy soul. The LORD shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time forth, and even for evermore.” Psalm 121:1-8. May it please the LORD to give us a glimpse of our complete preservation in Christ. Jude 24. I'm going to read this Psalm again tonight with my wife, and I hope it's as rich in gospel treasure as it is at this moment. Wow, these thoughts are very scattered, hopefully there’s some ‘good’ which can be extracted. MPJ

Some thoughts in regards to “God’s Authorship of Sin,” which I was recently asked about, along with some general observations from the scriptures that pertain to this subject matter. As an introductory statement I’ll affirm my fixed persuasion that man’s will has no independent existence outside the realm of God’s decree, and that the LORD is actively controlling all things according to his eternal counsel, so that everything is exactly the way it should be! Every atom is precisely positioned, every star is in its designated orbit, every sparrow duly provided for, &c., nothing is haphazard, and all things perfectly arranged as all of creation unerringly moves “according to the eternal purpose” which GOD “purposed in Christ Jesus.” Ephesians 3:11. “For I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, my counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure.” Isaiah 46:9-10. Whatever persuasions we may be brought to as we search the scriptures, Acts 17:11, every believer, every spiritual worshiper of Christ has this indisputable fact etched within their mind, as delineated by the spirit of truth, which is that the essence and character of GOD is unassailable and above reproach! We “worship at his footstool; for he is holy!” Psalm 99:5.

And although God’s holy essence eludes our comprehension, we have been mercifully given enough light to know with a certainty that everything GOD does is inherently holy and just! GOD is so indescribably above any limitations that men place upon him, (whether or not they manufacture them in their minds from the misuse of scripture, the ‘gospel’ traditions of men, their own moral code, &c.,) for just “as the heavens are higher than the earth,” Isaiah 55:8, so the ways of the LORD are far above our measly apprehensions of what we think we know, and can only be discerned through his word and through his Christ. “For with thee is the fountain of life, in thy light shall we see light,” Psalm 36:9, as “of him, and through him, and to him, are all things, to whom be glory for ever.” Romans 11:36. With this in mind it becometh us as beings with countless limitations to speak of that ONE whose attributes are veiled in infinity, with the utmost reverence, all unbridled thoughts in complete subjection to his unerring rule.

It goes without saying that Divine design is inherent in everything, expressing the undeniable unity and perfect structure of all which the LORD has fashioned. Psalm 119:73. Nothing is arbitrary! Everything has composition, structure and purpose, as all things are meticulously interwoven together by an infinite range of cause-and-effect scenarios, as the LORD {who in his infinite wisdom has decreed the end, and designed the means} harnesses all these resources, and subordinates all “according to the eternal purpose which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Ephesians 3:11.

Interestingly enough, the phrase that God is the “author of sin” is foreign to my gospel vocabulary, and is a term that I’ve personally never used? GOD is GOD and I don’t think he needs anyone to limit him as to what he has wrought or brought forth in the earth, as everything is in accordance with his unified purpose to glorify himself. We have far too diminished views of Christ, of the gospel, and of GOD in general as men nitpick about attempting to exonerate his glory by diminishing his sovereignty in implying that God is not the author of all things, and in some respects establishing himself as the ultimate missionary in attempting to save God from himself! Personally, I’m not too inclined to spend much time pursuing a subject matter that generally ends in unbelief in one form or another, no matter how we try to sugarcoat it.

Realistically, the entire question of whether or not GOD is the AUTHOR of sin is an imprudent one, generally articulated by those who seek to confine or limit the infinite ONE who is outside the realm of all limitations! God is the underlying cause of all things, and nothing exists apart from God. Besides, what basis could possibly exist for a “worm” of the earth, Job 25:6, to examine any of GOD’s actions with such critical scrutiny? “Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, why hast thou made me thus?” Romans 9:20. Would GOD who works “all things after the council of his own will,” Ephesians 1:11, ‘permit’ (as is commonly asserted) anything to take place which he did not absolutely will In the first place? Who actually believes this? All things are determined either by fate, predestination or by chance. If by fate then nothing matters! If by chance then everything is left up to us! If by predestination then God is in complete control! If he isn’t, then who is?

If this concept of mere ‘permission’ were true one must question the very nature of a God who most emphatically had the power to prevent Adam’s transgression yet chose not to intervene, somehow ‘permitting’ the introduction of sin and corruption to infiltrate the world which He created, which in its ultimate consummation necessitated the sufferings & death of his only begotten SON. Such a notion seems undeniably blasphemous, though commonly propagated within the confines of those who have in their thoughts decommissioned everything pertaining to sovereignty and sin that does not align with their own ‘moral’ code that God is prohibited to cross. Hopefully the LORD consulted them before he violated their standards of ‘morality’ by destroying the entire world civilization by a flood in Noah’s Day, Genesis 6:13, set ablaze the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, Genesis 19:24, “smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt,” Exodus 12:29, massacred the Canaanites under Moses and Joshua, Deuteronomy 20:17, annihilated the Amalekites, I Samuel 15:3, and commanded the prophet Samuel to hew “Agag in pieces.” I Samuel 15:33. Could God be held accountable for any transgression? Against whom can God possibly commit an offense? Is He subject to any law that exists above His own nature or any authority that exists beyond Himself? It is God’s eternal prerogative to act according to His own will! Once again, GOD is GOD and is not in any sense accountable to man in anything, which should settle it in our minds.

It really comes as no surprise when the unbelieving world (all whom the Lord has in derision, Psalm 2:4) scoffs and ridicules a believers confession of absolute sovereignty; but when did the entire ‘christian’ world turn deist in regards to this question of sin and evil, and the hands-off / clock-wound policy that GOD has erected as man puts in motion the affairs of this life? It just isn’t so! The scriptures speak of ONE “who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will,” Ephesians 1:11, “in whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind,” Job 12:10, who “hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.” Psalm 115:3.

But human autonomy bolstered up by the “ye shall be as god” movement recoils from this truth, as men possess an intrinsic aversion (an “inalienable right”) towards the thought of being “controlled” by another, (“we be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man,” John 8:33,) as they subscribe to a theological framework that depicts ALMIGHTY GOD as a mere opportunist, as he finagles his way through life, exploiting the innate wickedness of man to some greater end? The unerring creator and disposer of all things, “that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers,” Colossians 1:16, is not reactatory and knows nothing contingently. The LORD “in whose hand is the soul of every living thing, and the breath of all mankind,” Job 12:10, who by his Spirit garnished the heavens, and “formed the crooked serpent,” Job 26:13, has no dependence whatsoever on external circumstances to bring about his eternal purpose. All things, including the sinful acts of men, are governed and manipulated, (either directly or indirectly,) and ultimately tend to the one great end for which they were created. “All things were created by HIM, and for HIM, and he is before all things, and by HIM all things consist.” Colossians 1:17.

How about those events that GOD meticulously orchestrated in bringing forth CHRIST, in the precise way and manner in which they unfolded? Acts 2:23. One may indeed question how the advent of a Saviour that was “foreordained before the foundation of the world,” I Peter 1:20, could be so entirely predetermined, and everything “fall into place” in the precise manner that it did by “the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will,” Ephesians 1:11, if the occurrence of ‘sin’ is excluded and relegated to chance? How can one ensure anything through chance, given that a solitary random and unforeseen event could potentially dismantle the entire framework?

The same Divine blueprint that assured the coming of Christ as the Redeemer of sinners likewise irrevocably ordained the fall of Adam and the ensuing introduction of sin. If GOD did not decree the existence of sin, (“in the day that thou eatest,” Genesis 2:17, not “if” but “when” thou eatest,) it would not have come into existence, unless we somehow think that sin is greater than God? If Adam “chose” to sin prior to God’s ordination of that sin, then the will of God would be reliant upon and subordinate to the will of man. Perfect, it’s just where “christianity” wants god, who in their atrocious thoughts keep him there, safely confined within their theological borders.

Throughout the old testament ages {otherwise known as our redemption history} could there have been some sin committed or uncommitted in “the generation of Jesus Christ”? Matthew 1:1. Was anything out of place? Could those “wicked hands” that crucified Christ acted any differently? Once again, GOD is GOD, and is under no constraint or limitation to the “forces” that HE has actively engaged to bring about his divine purpose! We read of “an everlasting covenant ordered in all things, and sure,” II Samuel 23:5, of a “Lamb slain,” Revelation 13:8, a “kingdom prepared,” Matthew 25:34, of an elect seed chosen “in Christ,” Ephesians 1:4, of “works” that were “finished,” Hebrews 4:3, of the “hope of eternal life” which God “promised,” Titus 1:2, all either “from” or “before” the foundation of the world, and ultimately of the purpose of ONE that “worketh all things after the counsel of his own will.” Ephesians 1:11. Scripture is consistent through and through! “The LORD GOD omnipotent reigneth.” Revelation 19:6.

Additionally, the fact that our Heavenly Architect, (“our God is in the heavens, he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased,” Psalm 115:3,) is orchestrating all the affairs of this life in such a holy and precise manner in executing His will through the free and uncoerced actions of sinful men actually enhances His glory. “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!” Romans 11:33.

And lest any foolishly imagine that the very few of us who have been persuaded in our simple minds that GOD is GOD could possess any capacity to think lightly of sin, or as “slanderously reported” by some whom say that we entertain a “let us do evil that good may come” mentality of life, Romans 3:8, they know not what they affirm. How can those of us “that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Romans 6:2. These accusations and similar ones by the “many as desire to make a fair show in the flesh,” Galatians 6:12, directed against those of us that believe in unconditional election, free justification, unlimited sovereignty, &c., are ultimately against GOD himself in implying that CHRIST as “that great Shepherd of the sheep,” Hebrews 13:20, is somehow incapable or negligent in the ingathering, shepherding, and preservation of his flock. (“For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out.” Ezekiel 34:11.) The “foundation of God standeth sure!” “The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations,” II Peter 2:9, who in the name of Christ “depart from iniquity,” II Timothy 2:19, being called “unto holiness,” I Thessalonians 4:7, and “newness of life” in Christ. Romans 6:4. How shall we, how can we “that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Romans 6:2. The Lord is their shepherd! Psalm 23:1. The Lord is their keeper! Psalm 121:5. Listen, the LORD reigneth! That settles it, as he is so far above and beyond all this religious whitewash! “Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against GOD?” Romans 9:20. MPJ

MEANS: For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.” Romans 1:16. Stirred up in my mind by those thoughts which I posted about the great commission, and the fact that my wife and I ended our bible reading the other night with this particular verse, I thought I would attempt some remarks in relation to this passage, especially since my thoughts are going to run contrary to most. This passage of scripture as used by some as a proof text to somehow imply that “the gospel of Christ,” the “gospel of your salvation” as we read in one place, Ephesians 1:13, (as it sets forth that ONE in whom your salvation resides,) is “the power of God” to the unbeliever, or an instrument / means in regeneration (‘regeneration’ as commonly understood in the theology of man) those that are dead in trespasses and sins, as is commonly taught, I believe to be an error.

Lurking beneath this faulty premise is a notion that perhaps those of the calvinistic persuasion (who ‘shipwreck’ their own ‘faith’ by contending for gospel regeneration, a position that is inherently contradictory and cannot possibly be true if the sinner is totally depraved, or dead in sin) would be reluctant to admit, which is that those who could be saved, given the appropriate means, might just be the elect of God, and these chosen individuals would be condemned to 'hell' unless the Gospel is communicated to them.

It all comes down to preaching! It all comes down to some man that God has raised up in order to be the regenerating agent of quickening dead sinners. Those who want some part as necessary instruments in man's spiritual resurrection from the grave of total depravity, and who see themselves as an integral and indispensable component in this scheme of disciple making. These will make much of what they call ‘saving faith,’ which comes as no surprise, for in order to remain faithful to their calvinistic scheme they can’t use such conditionalistic terminology such as decisional regeneration, as this implies human effort, and the free will of man, so have of necessity shifted everything over to what they now call faith, because after all it’s the gift of God. But this is nothing more than a “theological smokescreen” in order to facilitate their importance, and mask their Arminianism.

The Bible does not recognize decisional or faith regeneration! In fact, contrary to what some of these in the gospel regeneration camp would assert the Gospel is NOT for the REGENERATION of sinners. Sovereign instantaneous regeneration is a direct and immediate work of GOD, through His Spirit based on the finished work of Christ, without any use of 'means' as they are called, as the word of Christ goes forth conquering those to whom it is sent {‘to you is the word of this salvation sent,’ Acts 13:26,} being capacitated by grace to receive the word with ‘all readiness of mind.’ Acts 17:11. ‘I will give them a heart to know me, that I am the LORD.’ Jeremiah 24:7.

Once we are brought to the realization that forging new believers is completely out of our hands, and we have nothing to do with making christians, then do we begin to see that the Gospel is for the CONVERSION of the elect, so that they might know those “things that are freely given to them” by God in Christ, I Corinthians 2:12, that they may lay hold upon the “hope of eternal life” Titus 1:2, and be instructed in the manner of their “holy faith,” Jude 1:20, as a delineated by Christ in the scriptures, Luke 24:45, and come to find everything in HIM, (for in CHRIST “dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily,”) from HIM, (“ for all the promises of God in him are Yea and in him Amen unto the glory of God,”) and unto HIM to whom “be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.” Ephesians 3:21.

A recap of the last few thoughts would be that the preaching of the Gospel is not in order to save sinners, but it's to glorify CHRIST in the manner of how he saves sinners. The gospel only gives light, not life, as no man is ever quickened or given life by the gospel. Men are not made alive by believing or understanding the gospel, but the fact that they believingly embrace the “grace of Christ,” Galatians 1:6, as delineated by the “Spirit of truth,” (“whom the world cannot receive,” John 14:17,) in the gospel evidences the fact that such have been given life, and are already in the way of Christ. This life is by a divine infusion of light by the spirit of Christ, (“we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding,” I John 5:20,) in order to be capacitated to believe “the record that God hath given to us eternal life,” and the fact that “this life is in his SON.” I John 5:11. The ‘gospel’ and the ‘word’ are clearly distinct, I Peter 1:25, and it is through the dissemination of the gospel that the ‘word’ is revealed and “life and immortality” are brought to light. II Timothy 1:10. Simply put the gospel is the method whereby God has deemed fit to enlighten and inform his people of that which Jesus Christ has accomplished on their behalf. “And we know (the knowledge of the gospel as the fruit of Divine quickening) that the SON of GOD is come and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.” I John 5:20. MPJ

GREAT COMMISSION: One basic premise with many who have aligned themselves with the ‘evangelical’ movement, which one could somewhat classify as anyone and everyone that is in any way involved with the proselytization (to convince someone to change their beliefs or way of life to match their own) of others, under some groundless assumption that countless ‘souls’ are perishing and going to ‘hell’ simply because they have not heard the ‘gospel’ being preached is false. But isn’t “getting folks saved” what it's all about? As ‘disciples’ of the LORD this evangelical charter is the zenith of our existence? There is no calling greater than this sacred work, surpassing all other priorities – no expenses are to be spared in this ‘holy’ endeavor, as souls are being turned into ‘hell’ as we speak, because we have not sent the ‘gospel’ to them – the 'heathen' are perishing and we must do everything on our part to fulfill the “great commission,” and other evangelical fables that are never to be questioned, and thus not subject to much scrutiny.

The “great commission.” Everybody recognizes the supreme importance of it. All are agreed! No surprise! Every doctor of divinity, every reverend theologian and professional bible scholar throughout the ‘church’ age, (these entrusted with the “key of knowledge,” Luke 11:52, that “understand all mysteries,” I Corinthians 13:2,) are agreed here! We can consult their commentaries and study their confessions of faith if we have any questions. Let's hope that there is no bias there, even though most of them were sort of reliant upon that ‘commission’ in order to sustain them in their way, (that is if they were ‘hirelings,’) and give some validity to their calling, so no surprise. We can only expect to find them all agreeing of the importance of this great commission, “as” they have constructed it in their manuals. After all, who would dare to question this obsession with christianity to fulfill what they call the great commission, to question something so obvious, and so tenaciously held to throughout the eons of so-called christian history? I wonder? Perhaps the entire christian world has bought into some huge scam? I honestly don't know? Something within me says I hope not, but then again, it's possible isn't it? Especially as one surveys the carnage of what has taken place in 2000 years of so-called church history, and the conversion-based gospels that are being panhandled about under the name of the christian religion.

What is this so-called great commission? Some sort of a commission that all followers of Christ supposedly have a duty to fulfill, by doing their part in going, or paying others to go, and make disciples, teaching, baptizing, &c., utilizing ministry, missionary work, evangelism, &c., funding bible colleges, theological seminaries, missionary societies, &c., and for what purpose? To fulfill this great commission! After all, this is what christianity is all about. This is the only reason the ‘church’ even exists! Without this there is no purpose! If we remove this pillar, the entire structure will come crashing down on us, and we will have nothing left to do but to worship Christ.

The majority of those who have so ‘sacrificially’ volunteered their services to fulfill this ‘great’ commission are generally under a variety of delusionary tenants, such as the false pretense that all men are redeemable, that salvation is found in conversion, and that all authority in heaven and earth is given unto men to accept or reject the edicts of Christ, calling on men to save themselves, and make their peace with God, and other mindless tactics. Such were never called! This is the driving engine of what the world calls Christianity. It's doomed, and believers have absolutely nothing in common with this system, and will not support it in the least. The true preaching of the gospel finds its roots in the cross of CHRIST, and to collaborate with those (“the enemies of the cross of Christ,” Philippians 3:18,) who deny its power is to deny that ‘faith’ which we are called upon to proclaim. Anyone proves himself false to Christ, to the very same degree that he has fellowship with the ‘world’ in this ‘disciple’ making business!

(As a quick side note, it seems to me that a very significant number of these “evangelists” consider their fervent commitment and enthusiasm to what they refer to as 'soul winning' as a means of securing their own personal assurance. The more passionately they stir up themselves for “winning souls for Jesus” and the more individuals they attract to their belief system, the more “assurance” they derive for themselves. For them it’s a double ‘blessing’! It’s the ultimate mother of all pyramid schemes!)

First and foremost we see that this was a commission received by CHRIST from the FATHER when all power was delegated unto HIM in heaven and in earth, and it goes without saying, that the LORD “who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will,” Ephesians 1:11, does not commission his work to anyone else. Christ as that ONE inaugurated and enthroned in his mediatorial capacity, Luke 1:32, was now delegated with “all power” over “all flesh” that he should give eternal life to the “many” that the Father had given unto him. John 17:2. Christ now commissioned in all his mediatorial fullness, and by the promised effusion of the Spirit, consequently authorizes and delegates his chosen disciples (“as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you,” John 20:21,) to proclaim in the ONE name of the FATHER, SON & HOLY SPIRIT, on the behalf of God’s elect, (for whom it is designed, and to whom the Spirit of the Lord sends it, Acts 13:26,) this message of “reconciliation,” II Corinthians 5:18, otherwise known as the “gospel of peace,” Romans 10:15, or the “glad tidings” of what was consummated at the cross, otherwise known as of the preaching of Christ crucified. I Corinthians 2:2.

Additionally, we also might ask ourselves, to whom did Christ say, “go ye”? The chosen disciples of our Lord, whom he had now specifically empowered and qualified for the work. And there is not a word here about sending others? In fact, I might be wrong here, (I'm shamefully too lazy to research it at the moment,) but I don’t believe that any of the New Testament Epistles say anything about making new churches, or sending out missionaries to foreign lands? If this was their number one task, would not this have been addressed?

Ever wonder why all this missionary activity is completely absent from the Old Testament? Instead of “goat herding” all the gentile nations together under some delusional hypothesis that this is what the LORD required, we discover the exact opposite. Their mandate was to “overthrow their altars,” “break their pillars,” “burn their groves with fire,” and “hew down the graven images of their gods,” Deuteronomy 12:2, to never “bow down to their gods,” or “do after their works,” to “utterly overthrow them.” Exodus 23:24. What? No missionaries being sent forth to evangelize the surrounding nations with some feigned and pretend love that is supposed to encapsulate all? The word of the LORD was never sent to the nations abroad, as it was not intended for them. Nothing has changed! “Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.” Luke 8:10. “Lord, who hath believed our report, and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed? Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.” John 12:38-40.

“The Lord knoweth them that are his,” and knows exactly where they reside! Precisely where he has placed them, whether it be in Jerusalem, Luke 2:25, Samaria, John 4:7, or under a fig tree. John 1:48. “For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out. As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day.” Ezekiel 34:11-12. Those reserved, distinguished and secured by the grace of election, in the hands of Christ, in whom they were chosen, and in whom they were blessed with all spiritual blessings all come to believe the gospel. “They shall hear my voice.” John 10:16.

Romans speaks with such heavenly splendor and gospel clarity of “HIM” that was of power to establish them (not to save them, beget them, &c., as they were already believers,) according to the gospel declaration - “the preaching of JESUS CHRIST” - Yes, this ONE commissioned by the Father. This ONE who not only fulfilled every commission, but met every condition, this ONE who once in the end of the world “appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself,” Hebrews 9:26, this ONE commissioned by the Father, (“to this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice,” John 18:37,) and it goes on to say in that passage, who now was “made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith.” Romans 16:25-26. All nations! Sounds pretty comprehensive! But what about the Chinese, the Indians, and lands far removed from the testimony of this gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ? What about them? Have you heard the gospel? GOD is GOD! Fall down and “worship at his footstool.” Psalm 99:5. God does not owe anyone an opportunity to hear the gospel, it's entirely his mercy & grace that He has placed his children in a place where they will hear the gospel, and be conducted in the way of Christ! “But I say, have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.” Romans 10:18. MPJ